Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:25:38.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Development of a Screening Questionnaire for Childhood Cruelty to Animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2002

Elise C. Guymer
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
David Mellor
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
Ernest S. L. Luk
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
Vicky Pearse
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Childhood cruelty to animals may be a marker of poor prognosis amongst conduct disordered children. However, other than semistructured interviews with parents or children, there are no screening instruments for this behavior. The aim of this study was to develop such an instrument. In the first phase of the study, a parent-report questionnaire, Children's Attitudes and Behaviors Towards Animals (CABTA) was designed and piloted on 360 elementary school children, enabling community norms and a factor structure for the instrument to be derived. In the second phase, the questionnaire was completed by the parents of a small sample of children (N = 17) to establish its test–retest reliability. In the third phase of the study, the CABTA was completed by the parents of 19 children who had been diagnosed with either a Disruptive Behavioral Disorder or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and the results were compared with the outcome of a semistructured interview with parents regarding their child's behavior toward animals. The results of the various phases of the study indicated that the CABTA consists of two factors, Typical and Malicious Cruelty to animals, and is a reliable and valid tool for detecting childhood cruelty to animals. Possible use and adaptations of the CABTA as a screening instrument in clinical and community samples are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)