Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:32:15.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Boot swabs to collect environmental samples from common locations in dairy herds for Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP) detection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2013

Tobias Eisenberg ,
Wilfried Wolter ,
Mirjam Lenz ,
Karen Schlez  and
Michael Zschöck
Tobias Eisenberg
Affiliation:
Department II (veterinary medicine), Landesbetrieb Hessisches Landeslabor, Schubertstrasse 60, D-35392 Gießen, Germany
Wilfried Wolter
Affiliation:
State Council, Schanzenfeldstraße 8, D-35578 Wetzlar, Germany
Mirjam Lenz
Affiliation:
Department II (veterinary medicine), Landesbetrieb Hessisches Landeslabor, Schubertstrasse 60, D-35392 Gießen, Germany
Karen Schlez
Affiliation:
Department II (veterinary medicine), Landesbetrieb Hessisches Landeslabor, Schubertstrasse 60, D-35392 Gießen, Germany
Michael Zschöck*
Affiliation:
Department II (veterinary medicine), Landesbetrieb Hessisches Landeslabor, Schubertstrasse 60, D-35392 Gießen, Germany
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: Peter-Michael.Zschoeck@lhl.hessen.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of the present study was the examination of the boot swab sampling technique for the collection of environmental material in order to identify Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP)-infected herds. Eight dairy herds were included into the study. Four of them had a well-known history of MAP-infection from a herd surveillance programme conducted since 2006. Cows in these herds were repeatedly tested positive in Pourquier® MAP-ELISA (Pourquier, Montepellier, France); in some MAP could be isolated in individual faecal culture despite that symptoms of paratuberculosis were never reported. In four presumably negative herds nearly all cows were repeatedly tested serologically negative for MAP. The pathogen was never isolated from faecal samples of cows by culture. The study was initiated with the aim of standardising environmental samples as a herd diagnostics, in which overall 130 pairs of boot swab samples from the cows’ surroundings were taken In 58 of 64 swab samples (90·6%) from confirmed MAP-infected herds the organism could be isolated by mycobacterial culture of the boot swab. Contrarily, in 66 samples from presumably MAP-negative herds only one swab was positive (1·5%). The utilisation of boot swabs as a standardised technique for environmental sampling offers an effective and inexpensive tool for identifying herds infected with MAP. This is the first report of using boot swabs for the collection of environmental samples for MAP- detection in cattle herds. This easy to perform technique enables the economical detection of MAP herd status.

Keywords

Disease controlenvironmental samplesJohne's disease (JD)boot swabherd diagnosticsMycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP)
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 80 , Issue 4 , November 2013 , pp. 485 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aly, SS, Anderson, RJ, Whitlock, RH, Fyock, TL, McAdams, S, Adaska, JM, Jiang, J & Gardner, IA 2009 Reliability of environmental sampling to quantify Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis on California free-stall dairies. Journal of Dairy Science 2 3634–3642Google Scholar
Anonym 2005 Uniform program standards for the voluntary bovine Johne's disease Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_diseases/johnes/downloads/johnes-ups.pdfGoogle Scholar
Anonym 2007 Kultureller Nachweis von Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Kot-oder Organproben. http://www.dvg.net/fileadmin/Bilder/PDF_AVID_Alt/methoden/AB_AVID-Methode_Paratb.pdfGoogle Scholar
Arnold, ME, Carrique-Mas, JJ & Davies, RH 2010 Sensitivity of environmental sampling methods for detecting Salmonella Enteritidis in commercial laying flocks relative to the within-flock prevalence. Epidemiology and Infection 138 330–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghaus, RD, Farver, TB, Anderson, RJ, Jaravata, CC & Gardner, IA 2006 Environmental sampling for detection of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis on large California dairies. Journal of Dairy Science 89 963–970CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bull, TJ, McMinn, EJ, Sidi-Boumedine, K, Skull, A, Durkin, D, Neild, P, Rhodes, G, Pickup, R & Hermon-Taylor, J 2003 Detection and verification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in fresh ileocolonic mucosal biopsy specimens from individuals with and without Crohn's disease. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 41 2915–2923Google Scholar
Corn, JL, Manning, EJ, Sreevatsan, S & Fischer, JR 2005 Isolation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from free-ranging birds and mammals on livestock premises. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71 6963–6967Google Scholar
Donat, K, Schau, U & Soschinka, A 2011 Identification of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infected dairy herds by environmental sampling. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 124 360–367Google ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, SW, Nielen, M, Santema, W, Houwers, DJ, Heederik, D & Koets, AP 2010 Detection of spatial and temporal spread of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in the environment of a cattle farm through bio-aerosols. Veterinary Microbiology 143 284–292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fyock, BA, Smith, J, Hoving, E, Schukken, Y & Whitlock, RH 2005 Whole herd fecal pools to assess herd MAP bio-burden compared to composite environmental samples. In Proceedings of the Proc. 8th int. Coll. Paratuberculosis, pp. 44Google Scholar
Lombard, JE, Wagner, BA, Smith, RL, McCluskey, BJ, Harris, BN, Payeur, JB, Garry, FB & Salman, MD 2006 Evaluation of environmental sampling and culture to determine Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis distribution and herd infection status on US dairy operations. Journal of Dairy Science 89 4163–4171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merkal, RS, Larsen, AB & Booth, GD 1975 Analysis of the effect of inapparent bovine paratuberculosis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 36 837–838Google Scholar
Pawlik, I, Yayo Ayele, W & O. F 2002 Role of the external environment, plants, and non vertebrates for the spread of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. In Proceedings of the Proc. 7th Int. Coll. Paratuberculosis, pp. 90Google Scholar
Pillars, RB, Grooms, DL & Kaneene, JB 2009 Longitudinal study of the distribution of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in the environment of dairy herds in the Michigan Johne's disease control demonstration herd project. Canadian Veterinary Journal 50 1039–1046Google Scholar
Raizman, EA, Wells, SJ, Godden, SM, Bey, RF, Oakes, MJ, Bentley, DC & Olsen, KE 2004 The distribution of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis in the environment surrounding Minnesota dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 87 2959–2966CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, RL, Schukken, YH, Pradhan, AK, Smith, JM, Whitlock, RH, Van Kessel, JS, Wolfgang, DR & Grohn, YT 2011 Environmental contamination with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in endemically infected dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 102 1–9Google Scholar
Vansnick, E, De Rijk, P, Vercammen, F, Geysen, D, Rigouts, L & Portaels, F 2004 Newly developed primers for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Veterinary Microbiology 100 197–204Google Scholar
Whitlock, RH, Wells, SJ, Sweeney, RW & Van Tiem, J 2000 ELISA and fecal culture for paratuberculosis (Johne's disease): sensitivity and specificity of each method. Veterinary Microbiology 77 387–398Google Scholar
Whittington, RJ, Marshall, DJ, Nicholls, PJ, Marsh, IB & Reddacliff, LA 2004 Survival and dormancy of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in the environment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70 2989–3004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed