Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T08:33:43.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Composition and enzymatic activity in bulk milk from dairy farms with conventional or robotic milking systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2017

Monika Johansson*
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7015, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Åse Lundh
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7015, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Ruben de Vries
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7024, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden Dairy Science and Technology, Food Quality and Design, Wageningen University, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Kerstin Svennersten Sjaunja
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7024, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: monika.johansson@slu.se

Abstract

The objective of the studies reported in this research communication was to investigate differences in composition and enzymatic activities in bulk milk samples provided from Swedish dairy farms with different management systems, i.e. automated (AMS) and conventional milking systems (CMS). A bulk milk sample was collected from each of 104 dairy farms, 51 using AMS and 53 using CMS, located in the same geographical region. Sampling took place within two consecutive days during the indoor period (October). Milk samples were analysed for contents of total fat and protein, free fatty acids (FFA), caseins and whey proteins, somatic cell count (SCC), pH, plasmin and plasminogen derived activities, and total proteolysis. Our results showed a lower protein content and higher SCC in bulk milk from AMS herds compared with milk from CMS herds. Plasmin, plasminogen and total plasmin/ plasminogen derived activities were lower in milk from AMS herds but despite this, total casein and the ß-casein fraction as % of total protein were lower in milk from AMS herds than in milk from herds using CMS. Total proteolysis was higher in milk from AMS herds, suggesting that other proteases than plasmin, e.g. cellular and bacterial proteases, contributed to the degradation of casein. This was supported by a positive correlation between SCC and total proteolysis (P < 0·01), as well as a negative correlation between total proteolysis and ß-casein fraction (P < 0·05). In conclusion, comparing the quality of bulk milk from commercial dairy herds using AMS and CMS, respectively, several differences were observed, suggesting a significant effect from management system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abeni, F, Terzano, MG, Speroni, M, Migliorati, L, Capelletti, M, Calza, F, Bianchi, L & Pirlo, G 2008 Evaluation of milk enzymes and electrolytes, plasma metabolites and oxidative status in twin cows milked in an automatic milking system or twice daily in a conventional milking parlor. Journal of Dairy Science 91 33723384 Google Scholar
De Koning, K, Slaghuis, B & van der Vorst, Y 2003 Robotic milking and milk quality: effects on bacterial counts, freezing point and free fatty acids. Italian Journal of Animal Science 2 291299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, R, Brandt, M, Lundh, Å, Holtenius, K, Hettinga, K & Johansson, M 2016 Influence of shortening the dry period of Swedish dairy cows on plasmin activity in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 99 93009306 Google Scholar
Innocente, N & Biasutti, M 2013 Automatic milking systems in the Protected Designation of Origin Montasio cheese production chain: effects on milk and cheese quality. Journal of Dairy Science 96 740751 Google Scholar
Johansson, M, Åkerstedt, M, Li, S, Zamaratskaia, G & Lundh, Å 2013 Casein breakdown in bovine milk by a field strain of Staphylococcus aureus . Journal of Food Protection 76 16381642 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, AL, O'Flaherty, F & Fox, PF 2006 Indigenous proteolytic enzymes in milk: a brief overview of the present state of knowledge. International Dairy Journal 16 563572 Google Scholar
Politis, I, Ng Kwai Hang, KF & Giroux, RN 1989 Environmental factors affecting plasmin activity in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 72 17131718 Google Scholar
Sorensen, A, Muir, DD & Knight, CH 2001 Thrice-daily milking throughout lactation maintains epithelial integrity and thereby improves milk protein quality. Journal of Dairy Research 68 1525 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, JW, Ely, LO, Graves, WM & Gilson, WD 2002 Effect of milking frequency on DHI performance measure. Journal of Dairy Science 85 35263533 Google Scholar
Svennersten-Sjaunja, K, Wiking, L, Edvardsson, A, Båvius, A-K, Larsen, LB & Nielsen, JH 2007 Effect of frequent milking on milk fat and protein. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 16 suppl 1 151155 Google Scholar
Vidanarachchi, JK, Li, S, Sternesjö Lundh, Å & Johansson, M 2015 Lipolytic activity on milk fat by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae strains commonly isolated in Swedish dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 98 85608564 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiking, L, Frost, MB, Larsen, LB & Nielsen, JH 2002 Effects of storage conditions on lipolysis, proteolysis and sensory attributes in high quality raw milk. Milchwissenschaft 57 190194 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Johansson supplementary material

Johansson supplementary material

Download Johansson supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 303 KB