Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:04:54.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of periparturient systemic treatment with penethamate hydriodide on udder health and milk yield of dairy heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2007

Martina Kreiger
Affiliation:
Clinic for Ruminants, Department for Farm Animals and Herd Management, Veterinary University of Vienna, Austria
Gabriele M Friton
Affiliation:
Department Corporate R&D, Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
Johannes Hofer
Affiliation:
Herd Health Service, Carinthia, Klagenfurt, Austria
Klemens Fuchs
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Statistics and Systems Analysis, Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria
Petra Winter*
Affiliation:
Clinic for Ruminants, Department for Farm Animals and Herd Management, Veterinary University of Vienna, Austria
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: petra.winter@vu-wien.ac.at

Abstract

Sixty dairy heifers from seven Austrian herds, with high prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus mastitis, were used in this pilot study. Heifers were randomly allocated to two groups. The treatment group received at parturition intramuscularly 10 million i.u. of penethamate hydriodide and then 24 h later, 5 million i.u.; the control group received no treatment. Bacteriological examination was conducted on 7, 14, 21, 35 and 49 d post partum (pp) and milk yield data, fat and protein contents and SCC data were collected every 5th week for the first 200 d of lactation. Occurrence of retained placenta and endometritis were recorded, and the days open of both groups were compared. No effect was observed on the postparturient genital tract health and reproduction indicators. On day 7 pp, four intramammary infections (IMI; two severe clinical; one mild clinical; and one subclinical mastitis) were detected in the untreated control group, whereas there were no IMI in the antibiotic-treated group. At subsequent samplings, there were fewer IMI in the antibiotic-treated group, which were later in lactation, less severe and less persistent. Although SCC was numerically lower in the treatment group, significant differences in SCC between groups could not be detected. Antibiotic-treated heifers produced significantly more milk during the first 15 weeks of lactation than untreated heifers. Over the whole observation period (200 d), peripartum antibiotic-treated heifers produced 323 kg more milk than heifers in the untreated control. Periparturient antibiotic treatment of heifers with penethamate hydriodide prevented IMI during the first week after parturition and achieved a significant increase in milk yield, which was found to be economically beneficial.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, RA, Patel, DA, Friton, GM & Oliver, SP 2006 Intracellular killing of mastitis pathogens by penethamate hydriodide following internalization into mammary epithelial cells. Proceedings National Mastitis Council Meeting, Tampa FL, USA, pp. 272273Google Scholar
Anonymous 2002 Tierärztliche Honorarordnung. Edited by the Austrian chamber for veterinarians, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, W 2005 Guidelines for clinical examination of internal and skin diseases in domestic and pet animals. 6th Edn Stuttgart, Germany: Parey VerlagGoogle Scholar
Berry, EA & Hillerton, JE 2002 The effect of an intramammary teat seal on new intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Science 85 25122520CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borm, AA, Fox, LK, Leslie, KE, Hogan, JS, Andrew, SM, Moyes, KM, Oliver, SP, Schukken, YH, Hancock, DD, Gaskins, CT, Owens, WE & Norman, C 2006 Effects of prepartum intramammary antibiotc therapy on udder health, milk production, and reproductive performance in dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 89 20902098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, MA & Friton, GM 2005 Stochastic economic modelling of the use of penethamate hydriodide (Mamyzin®). In Proceedings 4th IDF International Mastitis Conference, Mastitis in dairy production, Maastricht, Netherlands, pp. 232234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diernhofer, K 1950 Diagnosis of Mastitis. Wiener Tieraerztliche Monatsschrift 37 809866Google Scholar
Fox, LK, Chester, ST, Hallberg, JW, Nickerson, SC, Pankey, JW & Weaver, LD 1995 Survey of intramammary infections in dairy heifers at breeding age and first parturition. Journal of Dairy Science 78 16191628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friton, GM, Van Hattum, JC & Hoerstermann, D 2003 Pharmacokinetics in plasma and milk of benzylpenicillin following repeated intramuscular administration of Mamyzin (penethamate hydriodide) in lactating cows. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 26 (Suppl. 1) 100101Google Scholar
Hartung, J 1989 Statistics 7th Edn Munich, Germany: Oldenbourg VerlagGoogle Scholar
Langford, FM, Weary, DM & Fisher, L 2003 Antibiotic resistance in gut bacteria from dairy calves: a dose response to the level of antibiotics fed in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 86 39633966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, K, Harmon, RRJ & Langlois, BE 1992 Prevalence of Staphylococcus species during the periparturient period in primiparous and multiparous cows. Journal of Dairy Science 75 18351839CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myllys, V 1995 Staphylococci in heifer mastitis before and after parturition. Journal of Dairy Research 62 5160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Mastitis Council Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Madison WI, USA: NMCGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, SC, Owens, WE & Boddie, RL 1995 Mastitis in dairy heifers: initial studies of prevalence and control. Journal of Dairy Science 78 16071618CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, SP, Gillespie, BE, Headrick, SJ, Lewis, MJ & Dowlen, HH 2005 Prevalence, risk factors, and strategies for controlling mastitis in heifers during the peripaturient period. International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine 3 150162Google Scholar
Oliver, SP, Gillespie, BE, Ivey, SJ, Lewis, MJ, Johnson, DL, Lamar, KC, Moorehead, H, Dowlen, HH, Chester, ST & Hallberg, JW 2004 Influence of prepartum pirlimycin hydrochloride or penicillin-novobiocin therapy on mastitis in heifers during early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 87 17271731CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, SP, Lewis, MJ, Gillespie, BE, Dowlen, HH, Jaenicke, EC & Roberts, RK 2003 Prepartum antibiotic treatment of heifers: milk production, milk quality, and economic benefit. Journal of Dairy Science 86 11871193Google ScholarPubMed
Oliver, SP & Jayarao, BM 1997 Coagulase-negative staphylococcal intramammary infections in cows and heifers during the nonlactating and periparturient periods. Journal of Veterinary Medicine B 44 355363CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, SP, Lewis, MJ, Gillespie, BE & Dowlen, HH 1992 Influence of prepartum antibiotic therapy on intramammary infections in primigravid heifers during early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 75 406414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, WE, Nickerson, SC, Boddie, RL, Tomita, GM & Ray, CH 2001 Prevalence of mastitis in dairy heifers and effectiveness of antibiotic therapy. Journal of Dairy Science 84 814817CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owens, WE & Ray, CH 1996 Therapeutic and prophylactic effect of prepartum antibiotic infusion in heifers. Journal of Veterinary Medicine B 43 455459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owens, WE, Nickerson, SC, Washburn, PJ & Ray, CH 1991 Efficacy of a cephapirin dry cow product for treatment of experimentally induced Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 74 33763382CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pankey, JW, Drechsler, PA & Wildman, EE 1991 Mastitis prevalence in primigravid heifers at parturition. Journal of Dairy Science 74 15501552Google ScholarPubMed
Reinecke, A, Hansen, I, Tenhagen, BA & Heuwieser, W 2006 Clinical mastitis and production parameters during the first lactation of primiparous cows. Slovenian Veterinary Research 43 (Supplement 10) 1922Google Scholar
Roberson, JR, Fox, LK, Hancock, DD & Gay, JM 1994 Ecology of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from various sites on dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 77 33543364Google ScholarPubMed
Roy, JP, Du Tremblay, D, DesCôteaux, L, Messier, S & Bouchard, É 2005 In Proceedings 4th IDF International Mastitis Conference, Maastricht, Netherlands, p. 956Google Scholar
Schroeder, JW 1997 Mastitis Control Programs: Bovine Mastitis and Milking Management. NDSU Extension Service, North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science AS-1129. Available from: <http://www.ext.nodak.edu/extpubs/ansci/dairy/as1129w.htm>..>Google Scholar
St.Rose, SG, Swinkels, JM, Kremer, WDJ, Kruitwagen, CLJJ & Zadoks, RN 2003 Effect of penethamate hydriodide treatment on bacteriological cure, somatic cell count and milk production of cows and quarters with chronic subclinical Streptococcus uberis or Streptococcus dysgalactiae infection. Journal of Dairy Research 70 387394CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trinidad, P, Nickerson, SC, Alley, TK & Adkinson, RW 1990a Efficacy of intramammary treatment in unbred and primigravid dairy heifers. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 197 465469Google ScholarPubMed
Trinidad, P, Nickerson, SC & Adkinson, RW 1990b Histopathology of Staphylococcal mastitis in unbred dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 73 639647CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trinidad, P, Nickerson, SC & Alley, TK 1990c Prevalence of intramammary infection and teat canal colonization in unbred and primigravid dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 73 107114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waage, S, Mork, T, Roros, A, Aasland, D, Hunshamar, A & Ødegaard, SA 1999 Bacteria associated with clinical mastitis in dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 82 712719CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed