Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:52:10.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From six to zero per cent Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis milk ELISA positivity in three years – probably induced by Mycobacterium vaccae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2020

Daniel Elad*
Affiliation:
The Kimron Veterinary Institute, Bet Dagan, Israel
Inna Lysnyansky
Affiliation:
The Kimron Veterinary Institute, Bet Dagan, Israel
Rama Falk
Affiliation:
National Service for Udder Health & Milk Quality, Caesarea, Israel
Shlomo E. Blum
Affiliation:
The Kimron Veterinary Institute, Bet Dagan, Israel
Limor Weisbelith
Affiliation:
The Kimron Veterinary Institute, Bet Dagan, Israel
Inna Mikula
Affiliation:
The Kimron Veterinary Institute, Bet Dagan, Israel
Adin Shwimmer
Affiliation:
National Service for Udder Health & Milk Quality, Caesarea, Israel
*
Author for correspondence: Daniel Elad, Email: daniel.elad@gmail.com

Abstract

This research communication reports the results of a study aimed at investigating the effects of introducing Mycobacterium vaccae on paratuberculosis carriage in a dairy herd. M. vaccae is a non-pathogenic member of the Mycobacteriaceae, with immunomodulatory and immunotherapeutic capabilities, acting by stimulating the cellular immune system, important in protection against paratuberculosis. Starting in 2014 we administered, by gavage, 1010 live M. vaccae bacteria to all new-born heifers on a dairy farm, first within 24 h of birth and again 2 weeks later. Paratuberculosis carriage was monitored yearly by milk ELISA. Faecal samples of 50% of cows, aged 3 years, born 1, 2 or 3 years before the experiment's onset, were tested by qPCR for MAP shedding and compared to 100% treated cows of the same age. Within 3 years, milk ELISA positivity was reduced from 6 to 0% and remained unchanged for the subsequent 2 years. One qPCR positive control cow was found each year for a total of 3 animals (2.46%). One positive cow (1%) was found among the treated cows. Two of the 3 positive control animals, still present on the farm at the end of 2019, tested negative whereas the positive test cow continued shedding MAP. M. vaccae shedding heifers mixing with adult cows were the probable means of the microorganism's propagation. The results of this investigation indicate that the introduction of live M. vaccae may be an inexpensive and fast alternative to current paratuberculosis control practices, justifying further exploration of the topic.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, A, O'Brien, R, Liggett, S and Griffin, F (2018) The effect of sub-clinical infection with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis on milk production in a New Zealand dairy herd. BMC Veterinary Research 14, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocito, C, Gilot, P, Coene, M, de Kesel, M, Poupart, P and Vannuffel, P (1994) Paratuberculosis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 7, 328345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elad, D, Leitner, G, Krifucks, O, Blum, SE, Brenner, J and Weisbelith, A (2019) Administering live Mycobacterium vaccae to newborn calves orally to prevent paratuberculosis – preliminary examinations: safety and immune reaction. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine 74, 916.Google Scholar
Faisal, SM, Chen, JW, Yan, F, Chen, TT, Useh, NM, Yan, W, Guo, S, Wang, SJ, Glaser, AL, McDonough, SP, Singh, B, Davis, WC, Akey, BL and Chang, YF (2013) Evaluation of a Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Leud mutant as a vaccine candidate against challenge in a caprine model. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 20, 572581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fecteau, M-E (2017) Paratuberculosis in cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice 34, 209222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hancock, RE, Nijnik, A and Philpott, DJ (2012) Modulating immunity as a therapy for bacterial infections. Nature Reviews Microbiology 10, 243254.10.1038/nrmicro2745CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loupy, KM, Arnold, MR, Hassell, JE Jr, Lieb, MW, Milton, LN, Cler, KE, Fox, JH, Siebler, PH, Schmidt, D, Noronha, SISR, Day, HEW and Lowry, CA (2019) Evidence that preimmunization with a heat-killed preparation of Mycobacterium vaccae reduces corticotropin-releasing hormone mRNA expression in the extended amygdala in a fear-potentiated startle paradigm. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 77, 127140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, DM and Jenks, SM (2013) Ingestion of Mycobacterium vaccae decreases anxiety-related behavior and improves learning in mice. Behavioural Processes 96, 2735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAloon, CG, Roche, R, Ritter, C, Barkema, HW, Whyte, P, More, SJ, O'Grady, L, Green, MJ and Doherty, ML (2019) A review of paratuberculosis in dairy herds – part 2: on-farm control. The Veterinary Journal 246, 5458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, J, Chen, L, Liu, L, Li, H, Liu, B, Zheng, D, Liu, T, Dong, J, Sun, L, Zhu, Y, Yang, J, Zhang, X and Jin, Q (2017) Proteogenomic analysis and discovery of immune antigens in Mycobacterium vaccae. Molecular and Cell Proteomics 16, 15781590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, B, Dockrell, HM, Ottenhoff, THM, Evans, TG and Zhang, Y (2018) Tuberculosis vaccines: opportunities and challenges. Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) 23, 359368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Elad et al. supplementary material

Elad et al. supplementary material

Download Elad et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 397.8 KB