Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:53:26.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early weaning and high feeding level in post-weaning period did not impact milk production in Alpine dairy goats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2018

Clémence Panzuti ,
Gaëlle Mandrile ,
Christine Duvaux-Ponter  and
Frédéric Dessauge
Clémence Panzuti
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus-Ouest, 35042, Rennes, France
Gaëlle Mandrile
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus-Ouest, 35042, Rennes, France
Christine Duvaux-Ponter
Affiliation:
UMR Modélisation Systémique Appliquée aux Ruminants, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 75005, Paris, France
Frédéric Dessauge*
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus-Ouest, 35042, Rennes, France
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: frederic.dessauge@inra.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The experiment reported in this Research Communication aimed to determine the combined effects of early weaning and post-weaning feeding level on growth, reproductive parameters and milk yield in Alpine goats. Sixty-four Alpine goat kids were weaned abruptly at either 12·2 (±1·40) kg (40 d of age, E) or 17·7 (±2·30) kg (60 d of age, No). After weaning, E and No goats were subjected to 2 feeding strategies (n = 16): ad libitum concentrate until 130 d of age and then 620 g DM/d/goat until 200 d of age (EC and NoC) or ad libitum concentrate until 200 d of age (EAL and NoAL). Goats were weighed twice a month until 200 d of age. Pregnancy rate and litter size were recorded. Daily milk yield was measured by milk meter during the first lactation. Up to 60 d of age, average daily gain (ADG) of E kids was significantly lower than No kids. From 60 to 130 d of age, ADG of the four treatments were not different. After 130 d of age, EC and NoC kids had lower ADG than EAL and NoAL kids. Pregnancy rates of EAL and NoAL goats were lower than those of EC and NoC. Milk yield was not modified by weaning weight or feeding management. Milk quality was not affected by any treatment. To conclude, the age at weaning as well as the feeding level after weaning did not negatively impact growth and milk yield. We hypothesise that the establishment of the lactation function is not impacted by rearing management. Hence, decreasing the age at weaning could be an interesting way to reduce the cost of the rearing period in goat kids.

Keywords

RearingkidsADG
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , August 2018 , pp. 277 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Hannah Dairy Research Foundation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubry, JM, Finot, L, Wiart, S, Yart, L, Siroux, E, Chorho, M, Lassalas, J & Dessauge, F 2012 Effects of high feeding level on caprine mammary gland development and milk yield potential. In Proceedings of the ADSA/ASAS Joint Annual Meeting, Phoenix, Arizona,USA, pp. 189Google Scholar
Chemineau, P, Bodin, L, Migaud, M, Thiery, JC & Malpaux, B 2010 Neuroendocrine and Genetic Control of Seasonal Reproduction in Sheep and Goats. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 45 42–49Google Scholar
Ferreira, AV & Thornton, JD 2004 Feed intake and growth of Saanen kids weaned at 42 and 70 days of age. South African Journal of Animal Science 34 49–51Google Scholar
IDELE 2014 Elevage de la chevrette – Coût de l'alimentation – Actualisation 2013. http://idele.fr/no_cache/recherche/publication/idelesolr/recommends/elevage-de-la-chevrette-cout-de-lalimentation-actualisation-2013.htmlGoogle Scholar
INRA 2010 Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins. Quae Edition. Paris: QuaeGoogle Scholar
Le Cozler, Y, Lollivier, V, Lacasse, P & Disenhaus, C 2008 Rearing strategy and optimizing first-calving targets in dairy heifers: a review. Animal 2 1393–1404Google Scholar
Palma, JM & Galina, MA 1995 Effect of early and late weaning on the growth of female kids. Small Ruminant Research 18 33–38Google Scholar
Sejrsen, K, Purup, S, Vestergaard, M & Foldager, J 2000 High body weight gain and reduced bovine mammary growth: physiological basis and implications for milk yield potential. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 19 93–104Google Scholar
Ugur, F, Savas, T, Dosay, M, Karabayır, A & Atasoglu, C 2004 Growth and behavioral traits of Turkish Saanen kids weaned at 45 and 60 days. Small Ruminant Research 52 179–184Google Scholar
Van Amburgh, ME, Galton, DM, Bauman, DE, Everett, RW, Fox, DG, Chase, LE & Erb, HN 1998 Effects of three prepubertal body growth rates on performance of Holstein heifers during first lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 81 527–538Google Scholar
Zarazaga, LA, Guzman, JL, Dominguez, C, Perez, MC, Prieto, R & Sanchez, I 2009 Nutrition level and season of birth do not modify puberty of Payoya goat kids. Animal 3 79–86Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Panzuti et al. supplementary material

Table S1 and Figure S1

Download Panzuti et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 174.8 KB