Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T19:10:28.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of cleaning-in-place disinfectants on wild bacterial strains isolated from a milking line

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Tiina Mattila ,
Merja Manninen  and
Anna-Liisa Kyläsiurola
Tiina Mattila
Affiliation:
Food Research Laboratory, Technical Research Centre, Biologinkuja 1, SF-02150 Espoo, Finland
Merja Manninen
Affiliation:
Food Research Laboratory, Technical Research Centre, Biologinkuja 1, SF-02150 Espoo, Finland
Anna-Liisa Kyläsiurola
Affiliation:
State Institute for Dairy Research, SF-31600 Jokioinen, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two cleaning-in-place disinfectant Systems (alkaline–acid, alkaline–CI2) were tested on wild bacteria isolated from a milking line. Most of the isolated strains were Gram-negative and capsule-positive. The effect of milk and cream on the resistance of the wild strains to the cleaning Systems was tested. Suspension tests did not show the resistance of bacteria whereas the surface test showed high resistance towards all cleaning-agents. Milk had a protective effect only on the surfaces whereas cream showed mild protection in suspension and complete protection on the surfaces. It was concluded that the growth pattern of contaminants on surfaces needs further attention and the laboratory suspension tests do not correlate with the practical situation. Disinfectant tests based on bacterial growth on the surface are of importance.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 1990 , pp. 33 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archer, D. L. 1988 The true impact of foodborne infections. New developments in other disciplines have profound ramifications for food microbiology. Food Technology 42 53–57Google Scholar
Bačič, B., Cousins, C. M. & Clegg, L. F. L. 1968 Studies on the laboratory soiling of milking equipment. Journal of Dairy Research 35 247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. F. 1984 Chlorine tolerant bacteria in a water distribution System. Public Works 115 65–67Google Scholar
Costerton, J. W., Irvin, R. T. & Cheng, K. J. 1981 The bacterial glycocalyx in nature and disease. Annual Reviews of Microbiology 35 299–324CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cousins, C. M. & Bramley, A. J. 1981 The microbiology of raw milk. In Dairy Microbiology, vol 1 pp. 119–163 (Ed, Robinson, R. K.) London: Applied Science PublishersGoogle Scholar
Cousins, C. M., Hoy, W. A. & Clegg, L. F. L. 1960 The evaluation of surface active disinfectants for use in milk production. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 23 359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunsmore, D. G., Westwood, D. A., Jay, D. B. & Embling, M. 1980 Simulator technique for assessing the bacteriological control of food equipment surfaces by cleaning Systems. Journal of food Protection 43 850–855CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herald, P. J. & Zottola, E. A. 1988 Scanning electron microscopic examination of Yersinia enterocolilica attached to stainless steel at selected temperatures and pH values. Journal of Food Protection 51 445–448CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Dairy Federation 1962 Standard suspension test for the evaluation of the disinfectant activity of dairy disinfectants. International Standard FIL-1DF 19 1–10Google Scholar
LeChevallier, M. W., Cawthon, C. D. & Lee, R. G. 1988 a Inactivation of biofilm bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 54 2492–2499CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeChevallier, M. W., Cawthon, C. D. & Lee, R. G. 1988 b Factors promoting survival of bacteria in chlorinated water supplies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 54 649–654CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisbõa, N. P. 1959 A tube test for evaluating agents possessing both detergent and sterilizing properties. Proceedings XV International Dairy Congress London 3 1816–1822Google Scholar
Marrie, T. J. & Costerton, J. W. 1981 Prolonged survival of Serratia marcescens in chlorhexidine. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 42 1093–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nickel, J. C., Ruseska, I., Wright, J. B. & Costerton, J. W. 1985 Tobramycin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells growing as a biofilm on urinary catheter material. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 27 619–624CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwach, T. S., & Zottola, E. A. 1984 Scanning electron microscopic study on some effects of sodium hypochlorite on attachment of bacteria to stainless steel. Journal of fond Protection 47 756–759CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speers, J. G. S., Gilmour, A., Fraser, T. W. & McCall, R. D. 1984 Scanning electron microscopy of dairy equipment surfaces contaminated by two milk-borne micro-organisms. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 57 139–145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, L. S. & Zottola, E. A. 1985 Effect of cleaning and sanitizing on the attachment of lsRiidomonas fragi to stainless steel. Journal of Food Science 50 951–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar