Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:54:41.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of pH on flux during ultrafiltration of sweet whey and buttermilk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Harohally G. Ramachandra Rao ,
Michael J. Lewis  and
Alistair S. Grandison
Harohally G. Ramachandra Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AP, UK
Michael J. Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AP, UK
Alistair S. Grandison
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AP, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The flux patterns for sweet whey and buttermilk were strongly influenced by pH. Increasing the pH of buttermilk from 6·6 to 8·0 tended to reduce initial flux values and reduce deposit formation on the membrane as indicated by lower values for the fouling coefficient. Flux was mostly controlled by concentration polarization. Reducing the pH below 6·6 increased the flux but caused more deposit on the membrane as indicated by high fouling coefficient values. Almost the opposite was found for sweet whey. The initial flux increased as pH increased, followed by considerable flux decline, which was linked to greater fouling of the membrane. Reducing the pH reduced the initial flux considerably but also reduced further fouling. These changes are thought to be brought about by the combined effects of pH change on the proteins and minerals, and in particular on calcium.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , August 1995 , pp. 441 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

British Standards Institution 1977 Methods for determination of the viscosity of liquids. (BS 188)Google Scholar
Eckner, K. F. & Zottola, E. A. 1992 Modeling flux of skim milk as a function of pH, acidulant, and temperature. Journal of Dairy Science 75 2952–2958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, M. W., Hill, R. D. & Smith, B. R. 1980 Investigations into the ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis of wheys. I. The effects of certain pretreatments. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 15 109–121Google Scholar
Hiddink, J., De Boer, R. & Nooy, P. F. C. 1981 Effect of various pre-treatments on the ultrafiltration of sweet cheese whey at about 55 °C. Milchwissenschaft 36 657–663Google Scholar
Jelen, P. 1979 Physico-chemical properties of milk and whey in membrane processing. Journal of Dairy Science 62 1343–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jindal, A. R. & Grandison, A. S. 1992 Preparation and composition of chhana whey powders using membrane processing techniques. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 58 511–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, H. G., Gernedel, C. & Nakanishi, K. 1982 The effect of low molecular weight milk constituents on the flux in ultrafiltration. Milchwissenschaft 37 584–587Google Scholar
Kuo, K. -P. & Cheryan, M. 1983 Ultrafiltration of acid whey in a spiral-wound unit. Effect of operating parameters on membrane fouling. Journal of Food Science 48 1113–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. N. & Merson, R. L. 1976 Chemical treatments of cottage cheese whey to reduce fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of Food Science 41 778–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, M. E. 1979 Advances in whey processing – ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 14 86–92, 96–102Google Scholar
Muller, L. L. & Harper, W. J. 1979 Effects on membrane processing of pretreatments of whey. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 27 662–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, L. S., Holt, C. & Hukins, D. W. L. 1989 Phosphopeptide dissociation from micellar calcium phosphate preparations does not induce crystallinity. Journal of Dairy Research 56 669–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, J. L. 1990 Protein fouling of ultrafiltration membranes: causes and consequences. Journal of Membrane Science 52, 121–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, R. S. & Reuter, H. 1985 a Fouling of hollow fibre membrane during ultrafiltration of skim milk. Milchwissenschaft 40 731–733Google Scholar
Patel, R. S. & Reuter, H. 1985 b Deposit formation on a hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane during concentration of skimmilk. Milchwissenschaft 40 592–595Google Scholar
Patocka, J. & Jelen, P. 1987 Calcium chelation and other pretreatments for flux improvement in ultrafiltration of cottage cheese whey. Journal of Food Science 52 1241–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandra Rao, H. G., Grandison, A. S. & Lewis, M. J. 1994 b Flux pattern and fouling of membranes during ultrafiltration of some dairy products. Journal of the Science of Food, and Agriculture 66 563–571Google Scholar
Ramachandra Rao, H. G., Lewis, M. J. & Grandison, A. S. 1994 a Effect of soluble calcium of milk on fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 65 249–256Google Scholar
Reihanian, H., Robertson, C. R. & Michaels, A. S. 1983 Mechanisms of polarization and fouling of ultrafiltration membranes by proteins. Journal of Membrane Science 16 237–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, D. G. & Both, P. 1987 Studies on the precipitation of calcium phosphate. I. Experiments in pH range 5·3 to 6·8 at 25 °C and 50 °C in the absence of additives. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 41 105–120Google Scholar
Skudder, P. J., Glover, F. A. & Green, M. L. 1977 An examination of the factors affecting the reverse osmosis of milk with special reference to deposit formation. Journal of Dairy Research 44 293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, P. S. & Barbano, D. M. 1986 Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of membrane foulants isolated from membranes used for the ultrafiltration of whole milk. Journal of Dairy Science 69 (Suppl. 1) 54Google Scholar
Tong, P. S., Barbano, D. M. & Rudan, M. A. 1988 Characterization of proteinaceous membrane foulants and flux decline during the early stages of whole milk ultrafiltration. Journal of Dairy Science 71 604–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetier, C., Bennasar, M. & Tarodo De La Fuente, B. 1988 Study of the fouling of a mineral microfiltration membrane using scanning electron microscopy and physicochemical analyses in the processing of milk. Journal of Dairy Research 55 381–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar