Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:37:08.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of pulsation ratio on teat condition, milk somatic cell count and productivity in dairy cows in automatic milking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2015

Sabine Ferneborg  and
Kerstin Svennersten-Sjaunja
Sabine Ferneborg*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
Kerstin Svennersten-Sjaunja
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: sabine.ferneborg@slu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The pulsation ratio of a milking machine affects milk flow and milking time, and has also been reported to influence teat condition and milk somatic cell count (SCC). However, most studies comparing pulsation ratios have been performed on conventional cluster milking (whole-udder level), where effects such as deteriorated teat end condition and increased milk SCC are likely to be caused by over-milking on teats that are emptied faster than the other teats. When the teat cups are detached from each udder quarter separately which can be done in automatic milking systems (AMS), the risk of over-milking, especially in front teats, may be significantly reduced. This study investigated the effects of pulsation ratio on teat end condition, milk SCC, milk yield, milking time and milk flow in an automatic milking system where each udder quarter is milked separately. In total, 356 cows on five commercial farms were included in a split-udder design experiment comparing three pulsation ratios (60:40, 70:30 and 75:25) with the standard pulsation ratio (65:35) during 6 weeks. Pulsation rate was 60 cycles/min and vacuum level 46 kPa. The 70:30 and 75:25 ratios increased peak and average milk flow and the machine-on time was shorter with 75:25, while both peak and average milk flows were lower and machine-on time was longer with the 60:40 ratio. No negative effects on teat condition or milk SCC were observed with any of the pulsation ratios applied during the study. Thus it is possible that increased pulsation ratio can be used to increase milking efficiency in AMS where quarter milking is applied.

Keywords

Pulsation ratioautomatic milkingdairy cowteat healthudder healthSCC
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 82 , Issue 4 , November 2015 , pp. 453 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambord, S & Bruckmaier, RM 2009 Milk flow-controlled changes of pulsation ratio and pulsation rate affect milking characteristics in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 76 272–277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bade, RD, Reinemann, DJ, Zucali, M, Ruegg, PL & Thompson, PD 2009 Interactions of vacuum, b-phase duration, and liner compression on milk flow rates in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92 913–921CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berglund, I, Pettersson, G & Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2002 Automatic milking: effects on somatic cell count and teat end-quality. Livestock Production Science 78 115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, I, Pettersson, G, Östensson, K & Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2007 Quarter milking for improved detection of increased SCC. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 42 427–432CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruckmaier, RM, Schams, D & Blum, JW 1994 Continuously elevated concentrations of oxytocin during milking are necessary for complete milk removal in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 61 323–334CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Koning, K & Ouweltjes, W 2000 Year Maximising the milking capacity of an automatic milking system. In Proceedings of the Robotic milking: Proceedings of the International Symposium held in Lelystad, The Netherlands, 17–19 August, 2000, pp. 38–46Google Scholar
Dufour, S, Frechette, A, Barkema, HW, Mussell, A & Scholl, DT 2011 Invited review: effect of udder health management practices on herd somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science 94 563–579CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleeson, D, O'Callaghan, E & Rath, M 2004 Effect of liner design, pulsator setting, and vacuum level on bovine teat tissue changes and milking characteristics as measured by ultrasonography. Irish Veterinary Journal 57 289–296CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, J & Mein, G 1990 Measurement of machine-induced changes in the thickness of the bovine teat. Journal of Dairy Research 57 495–505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, J & Mein, G 1996 Teat thickness changes may provide biological test for effective pulsation. Journal of Dairy Research 63 309–313CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, J, Mein, G & Burkhard, N 1996 Recommended method for measuring changes in thickness of the bovine teat with spring-loaded calipers. Journal of Dairy Research 63 309–313CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansson, I, Korkman, N & Nelson, NJ 1952 Studies on udder evacuation in dairy cows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 2 43–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahle, DE, Galton, DM & Adkinson, RW 1982 Effects of vacuum and pulsation ratio on udder health. Journal of Dairy Science 65 1252–1257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mein, G, Bramley, A, Dodd, F & Bramley, J 1992 Basic mechanics and testing of milking systems. In Machine Milking and Lactation, pp 235–284 (Eds Bramley, AJ, Dodd, FH, Mein, GA & Bramley, JA). Vermont, USA: Insight BooksGoogle Scholar
Natzke, R, Everett, R & Bray, D 1982 Effect of overmilking on udder health. Journal of Dairy Science 65 117–125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neijenhuis, F, Barkema, HW, Hogeveen, H & Noordhuizen, JPTM 2000 Classification and longitudinal examination of callused teat ends in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83 2795–2804CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neijenhuis, F, Barkema, HW, Hogeveen, H & Noordhuizen, JPTM 2001 Relationship between teat-end callosity and occurrence of clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 84 2664–2672CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ontsouka, CE, Bruckmaier, RM & Blum, JW 2003 Fractionized milk composition during removal of colostrum and mature milk. Journal of Dairy Science 86 2005–2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostensson, K, Hageltorn, M & Astrom, G 1988 Differential cell counting in fraction-collected milk from dairy cows. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 29 493–500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfeilsticker, HU, Bruckmaier, RM & Blum, JW 1995 Interruption of machine milking in dairy cows: effects on intramammary pressure and milking characteristics. Journal of Dairy Research 62 559–566CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer, SB, Shin, JW, Rogers, GW & Cooper, JB 2007 Short communication: effect of vacuum and ratio on the performance of a Monoblock silicone milking liner. Journal of Dairy Science 90 1725–1728CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svennersten-Sjaunja, KM & Pettersson, G 2008 Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe. Journal of Animal Science 86(13 Suppl) 37–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, CV, Force, DK, Bremel, DH & Strasser, S 1991 Effects of pulsation ratio, pulsation rate, and Teatcup liner design on milking rate and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 74 1243–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, CV, Bray, DR & DeLorenzo, MA 1993 Evaluation of 50:50 and 70:30 pulsation ratios in a large commercial dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science 76 1298–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, EH & McFadden, TB 2007 The milk yield response to frequent milking in early lactation of dairy cows is locally regulated. Journal of Dairy Science 90 716–720CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zecconi, A, Hamann, J, Bronzo, V & Ruffo, G 1992 Machine-induced teat tissue reactions and infection risk in a dairy herd free of contagious mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Research 59 265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Østerås, O, Rønningen, O, Sandvik, L & Waage, S 1995 Field studies show associations between pulsator characteristics and udder health. Journal of Dairy Research 62 1–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed