Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:44:20.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of replacing soybean meal by a blend of ground corn and urea-ammonium sulphate on milk production and composition, digestibility and N balance of dairy Murrah buffaloes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2022

Tobias Tobit Melo ,
Leilson Bezerra ,
Viviany Santos ,
Marcelo Ferreira ,
Valdi Lima Junior ,
Luana Andressa Silva ,
Migson Menezes ,
Francisco Silva Filho  and
Ronaldo Oliveira
Tobias Tobit Melo*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Piaui, Rodovia Bom Jesus-Viana, km 135, 64900000, Bom Jesus, Piaui, Brazil
Leilson Bezerra
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Campina Grande, 58710110, Patos, Paraíba, Brazil
Viviany Santos
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Piaui, Rodovia Bom Jesus-Viana, km 135, 64900000, Bom Jesus, Piaui, Brazil
Marcelo Ferreira
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University Agricultural of Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manuel de Medeiros, s/n – Dois Irmãos, 52171900, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Valdi Lima Junior
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Campus Universitário Lagoa Nova, 59078-970, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Luana Andressa Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Campus Universitário Lagoa Nova, 59078-970, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Migson Menezes
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Campus Universitário Lagoa Nova, 59078-970, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Francisco Silva Filho
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Campus Universitário Lagoa Nova, 59078-970, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Ronaldo Oliveira
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Av. Adhemar de Barros, 500, Ondina, 40170-110, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Tobias Tobit Melo, Email: tobiaszootec@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of replacing soybean meal by a blend of ground corn and urea-ammonium sulphate (GCU-S) in the diet of lactating buffaloes on milk production and composition, digestibility, N balance and blood metabolites. Twelve multiparous dairy Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis), at 100 ± 4 d in milk and yielding 10 ± 2.5 kg/d, were randomly distributed in a triple 4 × 4 Latin square, with four different inclusions of GCU-S at U-S levels: 0 (control), 8.0, 16.4 and 24.1 g/kg dry matter (DM) total. Replacing soybean meal with GC-US had a significant depressing effect on absolute DM intake, which was still numerically evident but no longer significant when expressed on a body weight-related basis. Intakes of crude protein (CP) and N as well as N-urinary excretion were also significantly depressed. Digestibility of dry matter was improved and, as a proportion of DMI, intake of total digestible nutrients increased significantly. Perhaps as a result, feed efficiency (kg DMI required per kg 6% fat-corrected milk) was significantly improved. Efficiency of protein use for milk production was significantly improved, but not when expressed as milk protein output. N transfer into milk, as a proportion of total N intake, also increased significantly. However, GC-US inclusion had no significant effect on milk production or milk composition, nor did it affect serum metabolites, digestibilities (apart from dry matter) or N measures of balance apart from those mentioned above. Inclusion of this blend of ground corn with urea and ammonium suplate can be recommended for dairy buffalo because, although it decreases DMI and N-excretion, it improves DM digestibility and feeding efficiency whilst maintaining milk production and composition.

Keywords

Animal productionBubalus bubalismilk qualitynitrogenurea
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , May 2022 , pp. 134 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AOAC (2012) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC, 19th Edn. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemistry.Google Scholar
Arif, M, Al-Sagheer, AA, Salem, AZM, Abd El-Hack, ME, Swelum, AA, Saeed, M, Jamal, M and Akhtar, M (2019) Influence of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on milk production efficiency and nutrient utilization in early lactating buffaloes fed diets with two proportions of oat silage to concentrate ratios. Livestock Science 18, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agustinho, BC, Zeoula, LM, Santos, NW, Machado, E, Yoshimura, EH, Ribas, JCR, Bragatto, JM, Stemposki, MR, dos Santos, VJ and Faciola, AP (2020) Effects of flaxseed oil and vitamin e supplementation on digestibility and milk fatty composition and antioxidant capacity in water buffaloes. Animals 10, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartocci, S, Tripaldi, C and Terramoccia, S (2002) Characteristics of foodstuffs and diets, and the quanti-qualitative milk parameters of Mediterranean buffaloes bred in Italy using the intensive system. Livestock Production Science 77, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazil (2008) Lei no 11.794 de 8 de outubro de 2008. Procedimentos para o uso científico de animais. Diário Oficial da União; 196; Seção 1. Available at https://legislacao.presidencia.gov.br/atos/?tipo=LEI&numero=11794&ano=2008&ato=57aQzYE5UNRpWT7e7.Google Scholar
Brun-Lafleur, L, Delaby, L, Husson, F and Faverdin, P (2010) Predicting energy × protein interaction on milk yield and milk composition in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 4128–4143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batista, JN, Pereira, FB, Pereira Filho, JM, de Lima, V Jr, dos Santos, VLF, Araújo, MJ, Moura, JFP, Pereira, ES, Oliveira, RL and Bezerra, LR (2020) Replacing corn bran and soybean meal in the diet with spineless cactus and cottonseed affects ingestive behavior, performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Murrah water buffalo. Animal Production Science 60 903–912.10.1071/AN19260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley (1995) Bentley2000Instruments: operator's manual. Chaska, 77p.Google Scholar
Bezerra Junior, JS, Silva, FL, Hongyu, K, Couto, AG, Medeiros, RBN, Araújo, FCT, Lima, LG and Fraga, AB (2018) Multivariate analysis of milk yield, lactation length, and calving interval in female buffaloes. Revista Colombiana de Ciência Pecuária 31, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broderick, GA and Clayton, MK (1997) A statistical of animal and nutrition factors influencing concentrations of milk urea nitrogen. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 2964–2971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casali, AO, Detmann, E, Valadares Filho, SC, Pereira, JC, Henriques, LT, Freitas, SG and Paulino, MF (2008) Influence of incubation time and particles size on indigestible compounds contents in cattle feeds and feces obtained by in situ procedures. Brazilian Journal Animal Science 37, 335–342.Google Scholar
Di Lella, T, Infascelli, F and Cutrignelli, MI (1995) Rumen degradability and proteic value of feed utilized by buffaloes. Bubalus Bubalis 1, 38–48.Google Scholar
Fox, DG, Tedeschi, LO, Tylutki, TP, Russell, JB, Van Amburgh, ME, Chase, LE, Pell, AN and Overton, TR (2004) The Cornell Net carbohydrate and protein system model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Animal Feed Science Technology 112, 29–78.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagawane, SD, Shinde, SB and Rajduru, DN (2009) Haematological and blood biochemical profile in lactating buffaloes in and around Parbhani city. Veterinary World 2, 467–469.Google Scholar
Hall, MB (2000) Neutral Detergent-Soluble Carbohydrates. Nutritional Relevance and Analysis: A Laboratory Manual. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.Google Scholar
Licitra, G, Hernandez, TM and VanSoest, PJ (1996) Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science Technology 57, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, AA, Gandotra, VK, Brar, PS, Honparkhe, M and Uppal, SK (2013) Effect of fish meal supplementation on production and biochemical alterations in dairy buffaloes during early postpartum period. Asian Pacific Journal Reproduction 2, 258–262.10.1016/S2305-0500(13)60159-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, DR (1987) Predicting intake and digestibility using mathematical models of ruminal function. Journal of Animal Science 64, 1548–1558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mintoo, AA, Zhang, H, Chen, C, Moniruzzaman, M, Deng, T, Mahbud, A, Huque, QME, Guang, X, Wang, P, Zhong, Z, Han, P, Khatun, A, Awal, TM, Gao, Q and Liang, X (2019) Draft genome of the river water buffalo. Ecology and Evolution 9, 3378–3388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naveed-ul-Haque, M, Akhtar, MU, Munnawar, R, Anwar, S, Khalique, A, Tipu, MA, Ahmad, F and Shahid, MQ (2018) Effects of increasing dietary protein supplies on milk yield, milk composition, and nitrogen use efficiency in lactating buffalo. Tropical Animal Health Production 50, 1125–1130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nexus Academic Publishers (2013) Sample Collection Guide; A practical Approach. Retrieved from http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/books/20140116135637.pdf.Google Scholar
Owens, FN and Zinn, R (1988) Protein metabolism of ruminant animal. In Church, DC (ed.), The Ruminant Animal: Digestive Physiology and Nutrition. Englewood Cliffs: Simon & Schuster, pp. 227–249.Google Scholar
Paul, SS, Mandal, AB, Kannan, A, Mandal, GP and Pathak, NN (2003) Comparative dry matter intake and nutrient utilization efficiency in lactating cattle and buffaloes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 83, 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, SS and Lal, D (2010) Nutrient Requirements of Buffaloes. New Delhi, India: Satish Serial Publishing House.Google Scholar
Reddy, PRK, Kumar, DS, Rao, ER, Seshiah, CV, Sateesh, K, Rao, KA, Reddy, YRK and Hyder, I (2019) Environmental sustainability assessment of tropical dairy buffalo farming vis-a-vis sustainable feed replacement strategy. Scientific Reports 9, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, KF, Moraes, LE, Casper, DP and Kebreab, E (2015) Predicting nitrogen excretion from cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 3025–3035.10.3168/jds.2014-8397CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, VA, Andrews, FN, Warnwick, K and Legates, JE (1970) Breeding and Improvement of Farm Animals, 6th Edn. Bombay, India: Tata MGCrah Hill Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Saleem, AM, Zanouny, AI and Singar, AM (2018) Effect of glycerol supplementation during early lactation on milk yield, milk composition, nutrient digestibility and blood metabolites of dairy buffaloes. Animal: An International Journal of Animal Bioscience 12, 757–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sallam, SMA, Attia, MFA, Nour El-Din, ANM, El-Zarkouny, SZ, Saber, AM, El-Zaiat, HM and Zeitoun, MM (2019) Involvement of Quebracho tannins in diet alters productive and reproductive efficiency of postpartum buffalo cows. Animal Nutrition 5, 80–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santillo, A, Caroprese, M, Marino, R, Sevi, A and Albenzio, M (2016) Quality of buffalo milk as affected by dietary protein level and flaxseed supplementation. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 7725–7732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, S, Singh, M, Roy, AK and Thakur, S (2016) Effect of pre-partum prilled fat supplementation on feed intake, energy balance and milk production in Murrah buffaloes. Veterinary World 9, 256–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sniffen, CJ, O'Connor, JD, Van Soest, PJ, Fox, DG and Russell, JB (1992) A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluation of cattle diets. II Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science 70, 3562–3577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soares, AD, do Nascimento Rangel, AH, Novaes, LP, de Lima Júnior, DM and Bezerra, KC (2013) Characterization of buffalo milk in different birth orders in the state of Rio Grande do Norte. Revista Agropecuária Científica no Semi-árido 9, 53–60.Google Scholar
SAS (2003) Statistical Analysis Software, User's Guide: Basics. Cary: SAS Inst. Inc.Google Scholar
Swenson, MJ and Reece, WO (1996) Dukes’ Fisiologia dos Animais Domésticos. São Paulo: Guanabara Koogan, 11. Ed. (856 pp.).Google Scholar
Tedeschi, LO, Fox, DG and Russell, JB (2000) Accounting for the effects of a ruminal nitrogen deficiency within the structure of the Cornell Net carbohydrate and protein system. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1648–1658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teixeira, LV, Bastianetto, E and Oliveira, DAA (2005) The water buffalo milk in milky industry. Revista Brasileira de Reprodução Animal 29, 96–100.Google Scholar
Uhart, M (2016) USAID Predict.Section5.2.11 Livestock Sampling methods: Cattle, Sheep, Goats, Camels, and Swine. no 28, Retrieved from http://www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/ohi/local_resources/pdfs/guides/predictsop-livestock-sampling-2016.pdf.Google Scholar
Valente, TNP, Detman, E, Queiroz, AC, Valadares Filho, SC, Gomes, DI and Figueiras, JF (2011) Evaluation of ruminal degradation profiles of forages using bags made from different textiles. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 40, 2565–2573.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ (1994) Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Ithaca, USA: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA (1991) Method for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Melo et al. supplementary material

Melo et al. supplementary material

Download Melo et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 144.3 KB