Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:17:41.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of a compartmental model to describe non-esterified fatty acid kinetics in Holstein dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2007

Peter J Moate ,
John R Roche ,
Lucia M Chagas  and
Raymond C Boston
Peter J Moate*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, New Bolton Center, Kennett Square, PA19348, USA
John R Roche
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania, Burnie, Tasmania, Australia, 7320
Lucia M Chagas
Affiliation:
Dexcel, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton, New Zealand
Raymond C Boston
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, New Bolton Center, Kennett Square, PA19348, USA
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: moate@vet.upenn.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dynamics of non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) metabolism in lactating dairy cows requires quantification if we are to understand how dietary treatments and disease influence changes in body condition (adipose reserves) and the production of milk fat. Recently, Thomaseth & Pavan (2003) presented a compartmental model (Thomaseth model), which employs the pattern of plasma insulin concentrations in humans to predict the dynamic changes that occur in the plasma concentrations of glucose and NEFA during an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). The Thomaseth model, or at least a similar model, could have potential application to the field of energy metabolism in ruminants because it would enable the estimation of parameters that describe the rates of whole body disposition of glucose, and the production and utilization of NEFA. In this study we investigated the suitability of the Thomaseth model to describe NEFA and glucose kinetics in 10 lactating Holstein-Friesian cows given a standard IVGTT in early lactation. The Thomaseth model described the general pattern of the NEFA response and, in particular, described the downward-slope and nadir in NEFA concentrations reasonably well. However, it failed to describe the initial latency period (the period before NEFA concentrations decline precipitously), and it could not describe terminal ‘rebound’ plateau in NEFA concentration. Because of these inherent problems, the parameters of the Thomaseth model cannot be considered to provide accurate estimates of rates of NEFA production or utilization. It is concluded that the Thomaseth model is not suitable for describing NEFA kinetics in lactating dairy cows.

Keywords

NEFA kineticscompartmental modelglucose tolerance testdairy cow
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , November 2007 , pp. 430 - 437
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, RL, France, J, Beever, DE, Gill, ME & Thornley, JH 1987 Metabolism of the lactating cow. III. Properties of mechanistic models suitable for evaluation of energetic relationships and factors involved in the partition of nutrients. Journal of Dairy Research 54 133–145Google Scholar
Bergman, RN & Cobelli, C 1980 Minimal modeling, partition analysis and the estimation of insulin sensitivity. Federation Proceedings 39 110–115Google ScholarPubMed
Bergman, RN, Ider, YZ, Bowden, CR & Cobelli, C 1979 Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. American Journal of Physiology 236 E667–677Google ScholarPubMed
Bergman, RN 2005 Minimal Model: Perspective from 2005. Hormone Research 64 (suppl. 3) 8–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boisclair, YR, Johnston, KB, Bauman, DE, Crooker, BA, Dunshea, FR & Bell, AW 1997 Paradoxical increases of circulating non-esterified fatty acids in somatotrophin treated cattle undergoing mild disturbances. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 14 251–262Google Scholar
Boston, RC, Moate, PJ & Stefanovski, D 2006 Modeling the glucose challenge in dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 86 569Google Scholar
Boston, RC, Stefanovski, D, Moate, PJ, Sumner, AE, Watanabe, RM & Bergman, RN 2003 MINMOD Millennium: a computer program to calculate glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 5 1003–1015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrannini, ES, Camastra, S, Coppack, SW, Flisher, D, Golay, A & Mitrakou, A 1997 Insulin action and non-esterified fatty acids. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 56 753–761Google Scholar
France, J & Thornley, JH 1982 A mathematical model of the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science 99 343–353Google Scholar
Frayn, KN, Coppack, SW, Fielding, BA & Humphreys, SM 1995 Coordinated regulation of hormone-sensitive lipase and lipoprotein lipase in human adipose tissue in vivo: implications for the control of fat storage and fat mobilization. Advances in Enzyme Regulation 35 163–178Google Scholar
Frohl, DM & Blum, JW 1988 Non-esterified fatty acids and glucose in lactating cows: diurnal variations and changes in responsiveness during fasting to epinephrine and effects of beta-andrenergic blockade. Journal of Dairy Science 71 1170–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hales, CN & Randle, PJ 1963 Immunoassay of insulin with insulin-antibody precipitate. Biochemical Journal 88 137–146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemsoquet, SN, Rideau, N, Rulquin, H, Faverdin, P, Simon, J & Verite, R 1997 Effects of duodenal glucose infusion on the relationship between plasma concentrations of glucose and insulin in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80 2854–2865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, LK 1989 A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45 255–268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLachlan, KA, Boston, RC & Alford, FP 2005 Impaired non-esterified fatty acid suppression to intravenous glucose during late pregnancy persists postpartum in gestational diabetes: a dominant role for decreased insulin secretion rather than insulin resistance. Diabetologia 48 1373–1379CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MinMod Inc. 2006 Dr Richard Bergman, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles CA, USAGoogle Scholar
Mora, EV, Scarfone, A, Calvani, A & Greco, A 2003 Insulin clearance in obesity. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 22 487–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oikawa, S & Oetzel, GR 2006 Decreased insulin response in dairy cows following a four-day fast to induce hepatic lipidosis. Journal of Dairy Science 89 2999–3005Google Scholar
Perseghin, G, Bonfanti, R, Magni, S, Lattuada, G, de Cobelli, F, Canu, T, Esposito, A, Scifo, P, Ntali, G, Costantino, F, Bosio, L, Ragogna, F, del Maschio, A, Chiumello, G & Luzi, L 2006 Insulin resistance and whole body energy homeostasis in obese adolescents with fatty liver disease. American Journal of Physiology 291 E697–E703Google ScholarPubMed
Randle, PJ, Garland, PB, Hales, CN & Newsholme, EA 1963 The glucose fatty acid cycle: its role in insulin sensitivity and metabolic disturbances of diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1 785–789CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sechen, SJ, McCutcheon, SN & Bauman, DE 1989 Response to metabolic challenges in early lactation dairy cows during treatment with bovine somatotrophin. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 6 141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stata 2006 Stata Statistical Software. Release 7.0 ed. Stata Corporation, College Station TX, USAGoogle Scholar
Stefanovski, D, Moate, PJ & Boston, RC 2003 WinSAAM: A windows-based compartmental modeling system. Metabolism 52 1153–1166CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumner, AE, Bergman, RN, Vega, GL, Genovese, DJ, Cochran, CS, Pacak, K, Watanabe, RM & Boston, RC 2004 The multiphasic profile of free fatty acids during the intravenous glucose tolerance test is unresponsive to exogenous insulin. Metabolism 53 1202–1207Google Scholar
Taylor, MW & MacGibbon, AKH 2002 Triaglycerols. In Encyclopaedia of Dairy Science, Vol. 3 pp. 1555–1559 (Eds Roginski, H, Fuquay, J & Fox, P). London: Elsevier Science LtdGoogle Scholar
Tepperman, J & Tepperman, HM 1970 Gluconeogenesis, lipogenesis and the Sherringtonian metaphor. Federation Proceedings 29 1284–1293Google Scholar
Teusink, B, Voshol, PJ, Dahlmans, VEH, Rensen, PCN, Pijl, H, Romijn, JA & Havekes, L 2003 Contribution of fatty acids released from lipolysis of plasma triglycerides to total plasma fatty acid flux and tissue-specific fatty acid uptake. Diabetes 52 614–620Google Scholar
Teran-Garcia, M, Santoro, N, Rankinen, T, Bergeron, J, Rice, T, Leon, AS, Rao, DC, Skinner, JS, Bergman, RN, Despres, JP & Bouchard, C 2005 Hepatic lipase gene variant–514CT is associated with lipoprotein and insulin sensitivity response to regular exercise. Diabetes 54 2251–2255Google Scholar
Thomaseth, K & Pavan, A 2003 Model-based analysis of glucose and free fatty acid kinetics during glucose tolerance tests. In Mathematical Modeling in Nutrition and Toxicology pp. 21–40 (Eds , JL & Berdanier, CD) Athens GA, USA: Mathematical Biology PressGoogle Scholar
Wueston, O, Balz, CH, Bretzel, RG, Kloer, HU & Hardt, PD 2005 Effects of oral fat load on insulin output and glucose tolerance in healthy control subjects and obese patients without diabetes. Diabetes Care 28 360–365Google Scholar