Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:49:33.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field studies show associations between pulsator characteristics and udder health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Olav Østerås ,
Odd Rønningen ,
Leiv Sandvik  and
Steinar Waage
Olav Østerås
Affiliation:
Norwegian Dairies Association, Postboks 58, N-1430 AS, Norway
Odd Rønningen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Norway, Postboks 5065, N-1432 Ås, Norway
Leiv Sandvik
Affiliation:
Medstat Research, Postboks 210, N-2001 Lillestrøm, Norway
Steinar Waage
Affiliation:
Central Veterinary Laboratory, Postboks 8156, N-0033 Oslo, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four different field studies including 64, 140, 850 and 180 herds were used to investigate the association between pulsator characteristics and udder health. The results indicate that the best udder health is found in herds with a d phase > 330 ms and a pulsation rate > 55 min-1. A d phase of < 250 ms was associated with significant elevation in bulk milk somatic cell count, a higher incidence of acute clinical mastitis and a higher frequency of cows having mastitis associated with major pathogens (mainly Staphylococcus aureus) as compared with a d phase of > 331 ms. There was also a significant positive association between a shorter d phase and a high incidence of teat lesions needing veterinary treatment. Herds having no such teat lesions had pulsators with significantly longer d phase than herds with teat lesions (300 ms ν. 288 ms). These results strongly suggest that in high-line milking machines the d phase should not be as short as 250 ms and should preferably be ∼ 300 ms, and the pulsation rate should be at least > 55 cycles min-1. There was a strong relationship between the effect of d phase and the rate of pulsation.

Type
Original articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alfnes, T. 1991 [Handbook for milking machine testing.] Ås: Norske MeierierGoogle Scholar
Anon. 1988 Nordic recommendations for milking machine plants. Function, dimensions and installation. Danish Dairy Board, Milking Hygiene DepartmentGoogle Scholar
Anon. 1991 [Instructions for testing milking machine installations.] Lelystad: Informatie en Kennis Centrum Veehouderij (Publikatie no. 19)Google Scholar
Bramley, A. J., Griffin, T. K. & Grindal, R. J. 1978 Some investigations on the effect of continuous vacuum milking on new infection of the udder. Proceedings, Annual Meeting, National Mastitis Council 17 291–300Google Scholar
Galton, D. M., Aneshansley, D. J. & Petersson, L. G. 1990 Reverse pressure gradients across the teat canal during machine milking. In Proceedings of Seminar, Machine Milking and Mastitis. Koldkærgaard, Aarhus, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Grøndahl, J. 1975 [Milking-out characteristics in cow in relation to teat canal diameter.] Thesis, Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine, OsloGoogle Scholar
Hamann, J. 1989 Machine milking and new infection risk. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mastitis, St Georgen, Austria, 113–122Google Scholar
Hamann, J. & Mein, G. A. 1990 Measurement of machine-induced changes in thickness of the bovine teat. Journal of Dairy Research 57 495–505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, J., Mein, G. A. & Wetzel, S. 1993 Teat tissue reactions to milking. Effects of vacuum level. Journa of Dairy Science 76 1040–1046CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Organization for Standardization. 1977 Milking machine installations—vocabulary. (ISO Standard 3918)Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. 1983 Milking machine installations—construction and performance (ISO Standard 5707)Google Scholar
Klastrup, O. & Schmidt Madsen, P. 1974 [Standard methods for bacteriological investigation of quarter samples. Nordic recommendations.] Nordisk Veterinærmedicin 26 197–204Google Scholar
Mahle, D. E., Galton, D. M. & Adkinson, R. W. 1982 Effects of vacuum and pulsation ratio on udder health. Journal of Dairy Science 65 1252–1257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mein, G. A., Brown, M. R. & Williams, D. M. 1983 Pulsation failure as a consequence of milking with short teatcup liners. Journal of Dairy Research 50 249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, H. -P. & Lindberg, M. 1992 Fibronectin-binding of staphylococci and streptococci. In Molecular Recognition in Host-parasite Interactions, pp. 57–64 (Eds Korhonen, T., Hovi, T. & Mäkelä, P. H.). New York: Plenum PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
østerås, O. & Lund, A. 1988 Epidemiological analyses of the associations between bovine udder health and milking machine and milking management. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 6 91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
østerås, O., Vågsholm, I. & Lund, A. 1990 Teat lesions with reference to housing and milking management. Journal of Veterinary Medicine A 37 520–524CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reitsma, S. Y., Cant, E. J., Grindal, R. J., Westgarth, D. R. & Bramley, A. J. 1981 Effect of duration of teatcup liner closure per pulsation cycle on bovine mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 64 2240–2245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitsma, S. Y. & Gupta, R. 1987 Teat hysteresis and other teat properties affecting bovine mastitis. In Proceedings International Mastitis Symposium, Canada, 31–43Google Scholar
Rønningen, O. & Reitan, A. D. 1990 Influence of static and dynamic teat characteristics and milking time on udder health in Norwegian Red Cattle. Journal of Dairy Research 57 171–177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS 1987 SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, version 6. Cary, NC: SAS InstituteGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. D. & Pearson, R. E. 1979 Likelihood of droplet impacts on teat ends during induced milking vacuum fluctuations. Journal of Dairy Science 62 1314–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. M., Mein, G. A. & Brown, M. R. 1981 Biological responses of the bovine teat to milking: information from measurements of milk flow-rate within single pulsation cycles. Journal of Dairy Research 48 7–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zecconi, A., Hamann, J., Bronzo, V. & Ruffo, G. 1992 Machine-induced teat tissue reactions and infection risk in a dairy herd free from contagious mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Research 59 265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar