Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T08:43:27.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The flavour of milk protein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

E. H. Ramshaw  and
E. A. Dunstone
E. H. Ramshaw
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Division of Dairy Research, Melbourne, Australia
E. A. Dunstone
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Division of Dairy Research, Melbourne, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The flavour stability of casein and co-precipitated milk proteins has been examined organoleptically. Differences in flavour stability were correlated with processing conditions and the early stages of the non-enzymic browning reaction were implicated in the off-flavour development. The ‘gluey’ flavour present in stored casein could be removed and the flavour stability improved by treatment with activated carbon or Sephadex. However, a better solution to the problem was to avoid the development of off-flavour by careful choice of conditions of preparation, drying and storage to minimize heat damage and browning. Conditions were established under which milk protein could be expected to have flavour stability during at least 6 months storage at ambient conditions.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 1969 , pp. 203 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Buchanan, R. A., Snow, N. S. & Hayes, J. F. (1965). Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 20, 139.Google Scholar
Cayen, M. N. & Baker, B. E. (1963). J. agric. Fd Chem. 11, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, R. P., Koncus, A. F., Cherrey, G. & Remaley, R. J. (1953). J. Milk Fd Technol. 16, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, S. T., Jenness, R. & Geddes, W. F. (1951). Adv. Fd Res. 3, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forss, D. A., Jacobsen, V. M. & Ramshaw, E. H. (1967). J. agric. Fd Chem. 15, 1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M., Kon, S. K., Lea, C. H. & White, J. C. D. (1948). J. Dairy Res. 15, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumetat, K. & Beeby, R. (1957). Dairy Inds 22, 642.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A. J. (1968). Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 23, 103.Google Scholar
Lea, C. H. (1947). Analyst, Lond. 72, 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, L. L., Hayes, J. F. & Snow, N. S. (1967). Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 22, 12.Google Scholar
Radema, L. (1954). Neth. Milk Dairy J. 8, 125.Google Scholar
Richards, E. L. (1963). J. Dairy Res. 30, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, W. & Hayes, J. F. (1961). Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 16, 108.Google Scholar
Simon, M., Wagner, J. R., Silveira, V. G. & Hendel, C. E. (1955). Fd Technol., Champaign 9, 271.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, M. (1961). Indian Patent 79596.Google Scholar
Supplee, G. C. (1923). Proc. World's Dairy Congress, Washington 2, 1248.Google Scholar
Tillmans, J. & Strohecker, R. (1924). Z. Unters. Nahr.- u. Genussmittel 47, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wingerd, W. H. (1962). U.S. Patent 3,040,018.Google Scholar
Wingerd, W. H., Bauer, C. D. & Damisch, B. D. (1962). U.S. Patent 3,036,918.Google Scholar