Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T06:54:32.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender composition in the workplace and marriage rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2023

Shiyi Chen
Shiyi Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06268, USA
*
Email: shiyi.chen@uconn.edu
Get access

Abstract

Theoretical models have ambiguous predictions on how workplace gender composition affects the incidence of marriage. Marital search theory suggests that having more opportunities for interactions between members of the opposite gender increases the likelihood of marriage. Yet, according to overload choice theory, people with more options could actually delay or forgo marriage if the increase in the number of choices makes it more difficult for them to make marriage decisions. I explore how changes in the gender composition within occupation and industry over the past 40 years affect marriage decisions. I find that a higher share of opposite gender coworkers within a person's occupation-industry is associated with a decreased likelihood of ever having been married.

Keywords

Marriageoverload choice theoryworkplace gender composition

JEL classification

J12: Marriage • Marital Dissolution • Family Structure • Domestic Abuse
Type
Research Paper
Information
Journal of Demographic Economics , First View , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angrist, J. (2002) How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor markets? Evidence from America's second generation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3), 997–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1981) A Treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S., Landes, E. M. and Michael, R. T. (1977) An economic analysis of marital instability. Journal of Political Economy 85(6), 1141–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. (2017) 5 Key Findings about LGBT Americans. Pew Research Center. Retrieved August 19, 2020, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/06/13/5-key-findings-about-lgbt-americans/.Google Scholar
Burdett, K. and Coles, M. G. (1999) Long-term partnership formation: marriage and employment. The Economic Journal 109(456), F307–F334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappori, P. A., Fortin, B. and Lacroix, G. (2002) Marriage market, divorce legislation, and household labor supply. Journal of Political Economy 110(1), 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, O. C. (1940) Sex ratio and marital status among negroes. American Sociological Review 5(6), 937–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossett, M. A. and Kiecolt, K. J. (1990) Mate availability, family formation, and family structure among black Americans in nonmetropolitan Louisiana 1970–1980. Rural Sociology 55(3), 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossett, M. A. and Kiecolt, K. J. (1993) Mate availability and family structure among African Americans in U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Marriage and Family 55(2), 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, R. and Stepler, R. (2017) Women May Never Make Up Half of The U.S. Workforce. Pew Research Center. Retrieved August 19, 2020, from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/31/women-may-never-make-up-half-of-the-u-s-workforce/.Google Scholar
Goldin, C. (2006) The quiet revolution that transformed women's employment, education, and family. American Economic Review 96(2), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S. S. and Kamenica, E. (2006) Choice Overload and Simplicity Seeking. University of Chicago Graduate School of Business Working Paper, 87, 1–27.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. S. and Lepper, M. R. (2000) When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(6), 995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lafortune, J (2013) Making yourself attractive: pre-marital investments and the returns to education in the marriage market. American Economics Journal: Applied Economics 5(2), 151–178.Google Scholar
Liu, W., Sela, A, and Berger, J. (2008) Variety, Vice, and Virtue: How Assortment Size Influences Option Choice. Journal of Consumer Research 35(6), 941–951.Google Scholar
Mansour, H. and McKinnish, T. (2014) Same-occupation Spouses: Preferences and Search costs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnish, T. G. (2007) Sexually integrated workplaces and divorce another form of on-the-job search. Journal of Human Resources 42(2), 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988) A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology 94(3), 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1997) Women's employment and the gain to marriage: the specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology 23(1), 431–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pestel, N. (2021) Searching on campus? Marriage market effects of the student gender composition. Review of Economics of the Household 19, 1175–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, Z. (1997) Breaking the racial barriers: variations in interracial marriage between 1980 and 1990. Demography 34(2), 263–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenfeld, M. J. and Thomas, R. J. (2012) Searching for a mate: the rise of the internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review 77(4), 523–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggles, S., Flood, S., Goeken, R., Grover, J., Meyer, E., Pacas, J. and Sobek, M. (2020) IPUMS USA: Version 10.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS. https://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V10.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. (2004) The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. New York: Ecco.Google Scholar
Shimer, R. and Smith, L. (2000) Assortative matching and search. Econometrica 68(2), 343–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. (2006) The marriage model with search frictions. Journal of Political Economy 114(6), 1124–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
South, S. J. and Lloyd, K. M. (1992) Marriage opportunities and family formation: further implications of imbalanced sex ratios. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(2), 440–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svarer, M. (2007) Working late: do workplace sex ratios affect partnership formation and dissolution? Journal of Human Resources 42(3), 582–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. F., Binder, A. and Matthes, J. (2022) The agony of partner choice: the effect of excessive partner availability on fear of being single, self-esteem, And partner choice overload. Computers in Human Behavior 126, 106977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, P. M., Fasolo, B., and Mcclelland, G. H. (2007) Escaping the tyranny of choice: when fewer attributes make choice easier. Marketing Theory 7, 13–26.Google Scholar
Turkle, S (2016) Reclaiming conversation: the power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
U.S Census Bureau (2019) Estimated Median Age at First Marriage, by Sex: 1980 to The Present. Retrieved August 19, 2020, from https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/families/marital.html.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, G. J. (1994) The effects of changes of the job offer arrival rate on the duration of unemployment. Journal of Labor Economics 12(3), 478–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar