Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T04:32:52.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of family networks and social capital on women's fertility intentions in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2021

Moussa Bougma  and
Clémentine Rossier
Moussa Bougma*
Affiliation:
Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP), Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
Clémentine Rossier
Affiliation:
University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: mbougma@issp.bf
Get access

Abstract

Family solidarities remain strong in African societies. In Ouagadougou, transfers within extended family networks provide an omnipresent means for coping with life's difficulties, and the desired number of children remains relatively high. The role of family networks in maintaining high fertility is rarely studied however for lack of data in conventional demographic surveys. This study uses original retrospective data and logistic regression methods to explore the role of the extended family's social capital in shaping women's desire for children in Ouagadougou. Results show that women belong to three types of family networks: (1) women who belong to large family networks on both her own and her husband's side and who maintain a moderate number of close relations with their own relatives; (2) women who also belong to large family networks on both their and their husband's sides but who maintain a greater number of close relations with their own blood relatives; (3) unmarried women with relatives only on their side and numerous close relations with their family. Support for children's schooling comes more often from women's relatives in networks type 2 and 3, and from husbands' relatives in network type 1. Support for children's schooling increases with the level of economic resources in family networks (proxied by the presence of a public employee), in all network types. Women in type 2 networks (centered on women's relatives) are more likely to want additional children compared to women in type 1 networks (centered on their husband's relatives), after controlling for economic resources in networks. This result suggests that practical support provided by family members could play a role, on top of economic support, in encouraging high fertility in Ouagadougou.

Keywords

Demand for childrenextended familyfamily networkssocioeconomic resourcesurban sub-Saharan Africa
Type
Research Paper
Information
Journal of Demographic Economics , Volume 88 , Special Issue 2: Exchanges in Family and Personal Configurations Beyond the Household , June 2022 , pp. 237 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adjamagbo, Agnès (1997) Les solidarités familiales dans les sociétés d’économie de plantation: Le cas de la région de Sassandra en Côte d'Ivoire. In Marc, Pilon Locoh, T. Vignikin, E. and Patrice, Vimard (eds.), Ménages et Familles en Afrique : Approches des Dynamiques Contemporaines, pp. 301–325. Paris: CEPED, pp. 301–325.Google Scholar
Aeby, Gäelle, Widmer, Eric D., Česnuitytė, Vida and Gouveia, Rita (2018) Mapping the plurality of personal configurations. In Wall Karin, Widmer Eric D, Gauthier Jacques-Antoine, Česnuitytė Vida and Gouveia Rita (eds.), Families and Personal Networks: an international comparative perspective, pp. 131–166. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1960) An economic analysis of fertility. In Universities-National Bureau (ed.), Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, pp. 209–240. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. and Lewis, H. Gregg (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 81(2, Part 2), S279–S288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaabæk, Ea H., Jæger, Mads M. and Molitoris, Joseph (2019) Family size and educational attainment: cousins, contexts, and compensation. European Journal of Population 36, 5751–2600.Google ScholarPubMed
Bongaarts, John (2008) Fertility transitions in developing countries: progress or stagnation? Studies in Family Planning 39(2), 105–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bongaarts, John and Watkins, Susan C, (1996) Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review 22(4), 639–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bougma, Moussa, Pasquier-Doumer, Laure, Legrand, Thomas K. and Kobiané, Jean-François (2014) Fécondité et scolarisation à Ouagadougou: Le rôle des réseaux familiaux. Population 69(3), 433–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1980) Le capital social. In Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 31, janvier 1980. Le capital social. pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1986) The forms of capital. In Richardson, J. G. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp. 241–258. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, John C. (1976) The Socio-Economic Explanation of High Fertility: Papers on the Yoruba Society of Nigeria. Changing African Family Project Series. Canberra: Department of Demography, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Cissé, Rokhaya, Fall, Abdou S., Adjamagbo, Agnes and Attané, Anne (2017) La parentalité en Afrique de l'Ouest et du Centre. In Laurent, Vidal (ed.), Renforcement de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales en Appui des Priorités Régionales du Bureau Régional Afrique de L'Ouest et du Centre de L'Unicef: Analyses Thématiques, pp. 37–59. Dakar: IRD, Unicef.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Carlo, Ivan, Aeby, Gäelle and Widmer, Eric D. (2014) La variété des configurations familiales après une recomposition: choix et contraintes. Revue Suisse de Sociologie 40(1), 9–27.Google Scholar
Downey, Douglas B (1995) When bigger is not better: family size, parental resources, and children's educational performance. American Sociological Review 60(5), 746–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A (1969) Towards a socioeconomic theory of fertility: a survey of recent research on economic factors in American fertility. In Behrman S. J., Corsa Leslie and Freedman Ronald (eds.), Fertility and Family Planning: A World View, pp. 127–159. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Garenne, Michel (2008) Situations of fertility stall in sub-Saharan Africa. African Population Studies 23(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Benjamin G., Workman, Joseph and Downey, Douglas B. (2016) The (conditional) resource dilution model: state- and community-level modifications. Demography 53(3), 723–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gouveia, Rita and Widmer, Eric D. (2014) The salience of kinship in personal networks of three cohorts of Portuguese people. Families, Relationships and Societies 3(3), 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. (1977) The strength of weak ties. In Leinhardt Samuel (ed.), Social Networks, pp. 347–367. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Helleringer, Séphane and Kohler, Hans-Peter (2005) Social networks, perceptions of risk, and changing attitudes towards HIV/AIDS: new evidence from a longitudinal study using fixed-effects analysis. Population Studies 59(3), 265–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
INSD et ICF International (2012) Enquête Démographique et de Santé et à Indicateurs Multiples du Burkina Faso 2010. Calverton, Maryland, USA: INSD et ICF International, 527 p.Google Scholar
INSD et Macro International Inc. (2000) Enquête Démographique et de Santé, Burkina Faso 1998–1999. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Macro International Inc., 326 p.Google Scholar
INSD et ORC Macro (2004) Enquête Démographique et de Santé du Burkina Faso 2003. Calverton, Maryland, USA: INSD et ORC Macro, 471 p.Google Scholar
Jæger, Mads M (2012) The extended family and children's educational success. American Sociological Review 77(6), 903–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaptijn, Ralf, Thomese, Fleur, Van Tilburg, Theo G. and Liefbroer, Aart C. (2010) How grandparents matter. Human Nature 21(4), 393–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KONE Hamidou (2007) Urbanisation, origine culturelle et fécondité au Burkina Faso., Thèse de Doctorat en Démographie, Université de Yaoundé II, Soa, IFORD, 298p.Google Scholar
Kuépié, Mathias (2012) L'impact de la solidarité familiale sur le niveau de vie et la pauvreté des personnes âgées au Mali. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement 33(2), 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Nan (1999) Building a network theory of social capital. Connections 22(1), 28–51.Google Scholar
Locoh, Thérèse (2003) Baisse de la fécondité et mutation familiale en Afrique subsaharienne. In Hertrich, V. and Keïta, S. (eds.), Questions de Population au Mali, pp. 65–80. Bamako: Le Figuier.Google Scholar
Lois, Daniel and Arranz Becker, Arranz O. (2014) Is fertility contagious? Using panel data to disentangle mechanisms of social network influences on fertility decisions. Advances in Life Course Research 21, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loury, Glenn (1977) A dynamic theory of racial income differences. Women, Minorities, and Employment Discrimination 153, 86–153.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Mark R. and Casterline, John B (1996) Social learning, social influence, and new models of fertility. Population and Development Review 22, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndongo Dimé, Mamadou (2007) Remise en cause, reconfiguration ou recomposition ? Des solidarités familiales à l’épreuve de la précarité à Dakar. Sociologie et Sociétés 39(2), 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, Alejandro A. (1998) Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puur, Allan, Sakkeus, Luule, Põldma, Asta and Herm, Anne (2011) Intergenerational family constellations in contemporary Europe: evidence from the generations and gender survey. Demographic Research 25, 135–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renaut, Sylvie (2003) L'entraide familiale dans un environnement multigénérationnel. Revue des Politiques Sociales et Familiales 71(1), 21–44.Google Scholar
Rossier, Clémentine (2019) La santé reproductive en milieu urbain africain: quels progrès restent à faire? In Rossier, C., Soura, A. and Duthé, G. (eds.), Inégalités de Santé à Ouagadougou. Résultats d'un observatoire de population urbain au Burkina Faso, pp. 143–169. Paris: Editions de l'INED.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossier, Clémentine and Bernardi, Laura, (2009) Social interaction effects on fertility: intentions and behaviors. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 25(4), 467–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossier, Clémentine and Peytrignet, Marie-Claire (2019) Pauvreté et santé dans les quartiers de l'OPO : une approche qualitative. In Rossier, C., Soura, A. and Duthé, G. (eds.), Inégalités de Santé à Ouagadougou: Résultats D'un Observatoire de Population Urbaine au Burkina Faso, pp. 71–100. Paris: INED.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rwenge, Mburano (2007) Statut de la femme, planification familiale et fécondité à Mbalmayo et Bafoussam. African Population Studies 22(1), 57–85.Google Scholar
Schoumaker, Bruno (2019) Stalls in fertility transitions in sub-Saharan Africa: revisiting the evidence. Studies in Family Planning 50(3), 257–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sow, K. and Desclaux, Alice (2002) La solidarité familiale dans la prise en charge des patients: réalités, mythes et limites. In Desclaux, A., Lanièce, I., Ndoye, I. and Taverne, B. (eds.), L'Initiative Sénégalaise D'accès aux Médicaments Antirétroviraux, Analyses économiques, Sociales, Comportementales et Médicales, pp. 79–93: ANRS.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E. and Seeman, T. E (1999) Psychosocial resources and the SES-health relationship. Annals New York Academy of Sciences 896, 210–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tenenhaus, Michel (2007) Statistique. Méthodes Pour Décrire, Expliquer et Prévoir. Paris: DUNOD, 679 p.Google Scholar
Traoré, Baba (2003) Grands défis en matière de survie et de développement humain au Sahel. In Hertrich, V. and Keïta, S. (eds.), Questions de Population au Mali, pp. 65–80. Bamako: Le Figuier.Google Scholar
United Nations, Population Division (2019) World Population Prospects: The 2019 Revision. New York: United Nations, Population Division. (https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/).Google Scholar
Vimard, Patrice and Fassassi, Raïmi (2007) La demande d'enfants en Afrique subsaharienne. In Ferry, B. B. (ed.), L'Afrique Face à ses Défis Démographiques : Un Avenir Incertain, pp. 197–251. Paris: AFD, CEPED, KarthalaGoogle Scholar
Wakam, Jean (1992) De la pertinence des théories économistes de la fécondité dans le contexte socio-culturel camerounais et négro-africain. Thèse de Doctorat, Yaoundé : Institut de Formation et de Recherche Démographiques (IFORD), 527 p.Google Scholar
White, Darcy, Dynes, Michelle, Rubardt, Marcie, Sissoko, Koman and Stephenson, Rob (2013) The influence of intrafamilial power on maternal health care in Mali: perspectives of women, men and mothers-in-law. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 39(2), 58–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Widmer, Eric. D. (2016) Family Configurations: A Structural Approach to Family Diversity. Routledge, 178 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Eric. D., Girardin, Myriam and Ludwig, Catherine (2018) Conflict structures in family networks of older adults and their relationship with health-related quality of life. Journal of Family Issues 39(6), 1573–1597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed