Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:30:46.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Birth size and physical activity in a cohort of Indian children aged 6–10 years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2012

S. H. Kehoe*
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
G. V. Krishnaveni
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Research Unit, CSI Holdsworth Memorial Hospital, Mysore, India
S. R. Veena
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Research Unit, CSI Holdsworth Memorial Hospital, Mysore, India
J. C. Hill
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
C. Osmond
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Kiran
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Research Unit, CSI Holdsworth Memorial Hospital, Mysore, India
P. Coakley
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
S. C. Karat
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Research Unit, CSI Holdsworth Memorial Hospital, Mysore, India
C. H. D. Fall
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: S. H. Kehoe, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. (Email sk@mrc.soton.ac.uk)

Abstract

There is evidence of a reduction in children's physical activity in India in the last decade. Our objective was to assess whether size and body composition at birth are associated with physical activity in school-aged children. Children from a prospective observational cohort study born in Mysore, South India between 1997 and 1998 (n = 663) had neonatal anthropometric measurements made within 72 h of delivery [weight, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), chest, abdomen and head circumference, crown–heel, crown–buttock and leg length, triceps and subscapular skinfolds]. At 6–10 years, children (n = 449) were asked to wear AM7164 or GT1M Actigraph accelerometers for 7 days. Body composition was measured within 6 months of activity monitoring. Arm muscle area at birth and time of activity monitoring was calculated from MUAC and skinfold measurements.

Activity outcome measures were: mean accelerometer counts per minute (cpm); counts per day and proportion of time spent in moderate and vigorous activity. The mean (s.d.) number of days with ⩾500 min of recorded accelerometer data was 7.0 (1.1). Linear regression models showed no significant associations between any of the neonatal anthropometric measures and the activity variables. Body fat percentage at 7.5 years was negatively associated with all activity variables (B = −4.69, CI: −7.31, −2.07 for mean cpm).

In conclusion, this study showed no associations between body size and skinfold thickness at birth and objectively measured physical activity in childhood.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.World Health Organisation, Food and Agriculture Organisation. Report of the joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 916 (TRS 916), 2003. Geneva.Google Scholar
2.Lobstein, T, Baur, L, Uauy, R. Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev. 2004; 5 (Suppl. 1), 4104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Kumar, S, Mahabalaraju, DK, Anuroopa, MS. Prevalence of obesity and its influencing factor among affluent school children of Davangere city. Indian J Community Med. 2007; 32, 1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Aziz, S, Noorulain, W, Zaidi, UE, Hossain, K, Siddiqui, IA. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents of affluent schools in Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009; 59, 3538.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Eng J Med. 2002; 346, 393403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Bhave, S, Bavdekar, A, Otiv, M. IAP National Task Force for Childhood Prevention of Adult Diseases. Indian Pediatr. 2004; 41, 559575.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Puyau, MR, Adolph, AL, Vohra, FA, Butte, NF. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obes Res. 2002; 10, 150157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Vickers, MH, Breier, BH, McCarthy, D, Gluckman, PD. Sedentary behavior during postnatal life is determined by the prenatal environment and exacerbated by postnatal hypercaloric nutrition. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003; 285, R271R273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Taylor, PD, Poston, L. Developmental programming of obesity in mammals. Exp Physiol. 2007; 92, 287298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Inskip, H, Godfrey, K, Martin, HJ, et al. . Size at birth and its relation to muscle strength in young adult women. J Intern Med. 2007; 262, 368374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Boreham, CA, Murray, L, Dedman, D, Davey Smith, G, Savage, JM, Strain, JJ. Birthweight and aerobic fitness in adolescents: the Northern Ireland Young Hearts Project. Public Health. 2001; 115, 373379.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Yajnik, CS, Fall, CH, Coyaji, KJ, et al. . Neonatal anthropometry: the thin–fat Indian baby. The Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003; 27, 173180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Krishnaveni, GV, Hill, JC, Veena, SR, et al. . Truncal adiposity is present at birth and in early childhood in South Indian children. Indian Pediatr. 2005; 42, 527538.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Hendelman, D, Miller, K, Baggett, C, Debold, E, Freedson, P. Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32 (Suppl. 9), S442S449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Corder, K, Brage, S, Ramachandran, A, Snehalatha, C, Wareham, N, Ekelund, U. Comparison of two Actigraph models for assessing free-living physical activity in Indian adolescents. J Sports Sci. 2007; 25, 16071611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2) 1998–1999, 2000. IIPS/ORC Macro: Mumbai/Washington, DC.Google Scholar
17.Jelliffe, DB, Jelliffe, EP. Prevalence of proteincalorie malnutrition in Haitian preschool children. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1960; 50, 13551366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Evenson, KR, Catellier, DJ, Gill, K, Ondrak, KS, McMurray, RG. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 2008; 26, 15571565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Trost, SG, Loprinzi, PD, Moore, R, Pfeiffer, KA. Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43, 13601368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.World Health Organisation. The WHO Child Growth Standards, 2007. WHO: Geneva.Google Scholar
21.Mattocks, C, Ness, A, Deere, K, et al. . Early life determinants of physical activity in 11 to 12 year olds: cohort study. BMJ. 2008; 336, 2629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Ridgway, CL, Brage, S, Sharp, SJ, et al. . Does birth weight influence physical activity in youth? A combined analysis of four studies using objectively measured physical activity. PLoS One. 2011; 6, e16125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Hallal, PC, Wells, JC, Reichert, FF, Anselmi, L, Victora, CG. Early determinants of physical activity in adolescence: prospective birth cohort study. BMJ. 2006; 332, 10021007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Rogers, M, Fay, TB, Whitfield, MF, Tomlinson, J, Grunau, RE. Aerobic capacity, strength, flexibility, and activity level in unimpaired extremely low birth weight (>800 g) survivors at 17 years of age compared with term-born control subjects. Pediatrics. 2005; 116, e58e65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Eriksson, JG, Yliharsila, H, Forsen, T, Osmond, C, Barker, DJ. Exercise protects against glucose intolerance in individuals with a small body size at birth. Prev Med. 2004; 39, 164167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Andersen, LG, Angquist, L, Gamborg, M, et al. . Birth weight in relation to leisure time physical activity in adolescence and adulthood: meta-analysis of results from 13 Nordic cohorts. PLoS One. 2009; 4, e8192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Barker, DJP. Mothers, babies and health in later life, 2nd edn. 1998, Churchill Livingstone: Scotland.Google Scholar
28.Butte, NF, Puyau, MR, Adolph, AL, Vohra, FA, Zakeri, I. Physical activity in nonoverweight and overweight Hispanic children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39, 12571266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Stevens, J, Murray, DM, Baggett, CD, et al. . Objectively assessed associations between physical activity and body composition in middle-school girls: the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls. Am J Epidemiol. 2007; 166, 12981305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Ekelund, U, Sjostrom, M, Yngve, A, et al. . Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33, 275281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.van Sluijs, EM, Skidmore, PM, Mwanza, K, et al. . Physical activity and dietary behaviour in a population-based sample of British 10-year old children: the SPEEDY study (Sport, Physical activity and Eating behaviour: environmental Determinants in Young people). BMC Public Health. 2008; 8, 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Fischbacher, CM, Hunt, S, Alexander, L. How physically active are South Asians in the United Kingdom? A literature review. J Public Health (Oxf). 2004; 26, 250258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Guthold, R, Ono, T, Strong, KL, Chatterji, S, Morabia, A. Worldwide variability in physical inactivity a 51-country survey. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 34, 486494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Bavdekar, A, Yajnik, CS, Fall, CH, et al. . Insulin resistance syndrome in 8-year-old Indian children: small at birth, big at 8 years, or both? Diabetes. 1999; 48, 24222429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar