Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:35:43.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preconception and pregnancy: opportunities to intervene to improve women’s diets and lifestyles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

M. Barker ,
J. Baird ,
W. Lawrence ,
C. Vogel ,
S. Stömmer ,
T. Rose ,
H. Inskip ,
K. Godfrey  and
C. Cooper
M. Barker*
Affiliation:
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
J. Baird
Affiliation:
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
W. Lawrence
Affiliation:
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
C. Vogel
Affiliation:
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
S. Stömmer
Affiliation:
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
T. Rose
Affiliation:
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
H. Inskip
Affiliation:
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
K. Godfrey
Affiliation:
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
C. Cooper
Affiliation:
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: M. Barker, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. (Email meb@mrc.soton.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recently, large-scale trials of behavioural interventions have failed to show improvements in pregnancy outcomes. They have, however, shown that lifestyle support improves maternal diet and physical activity during pregnancy, and can reduce weight gain. This suggests that pregnancy, and possibly the whole periconceptional period, represents a ‘teachable moment’ for changes in diet and lifestyle, an idea that was made much of in the recent report of the Chief Medical Officer for England. The greatest challenge with all trials of diet and lifestyle interventions is to engage people and to sustain this engagement. With this in mind, we propose a design of intervention that aims simultaneously to engage women through motivational conversations and to offer access to a digital platform that provides structured support for diet and lifestyle change. This intervention design therefore makes best use of learning from the trials described above and from recent advances in digital intervention design.

Keywords

epidemiology/public healthmaternal pregnancyoutcome/system
Type
Commentary
Information
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease , Volume 7 , Issue 3: Themed Issue: Ibero-American DOHaD Society , June 2016 , pp. 330 - 333
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dodd, JM, Turnbull, D, McPhee, AJ, et al. Antenatal lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese: LIMIT randomised trial. BMJ. 2014; 348, g1285.Google Scholar
2. Poston, L, Bell, R, Croker, H, et al. Effect of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnant women (the UPBEAT study): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015; 3, 767–777.Google Scholar
3. Dodd, JM, Cramp, C, Sui, Z, et al. The effects of antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese on maternal diet and physical activity: the LIMIT randomised trial. BMC Med. 2014; 12, 161.Google Scholar
4. Prochaska, JO, DiClemente, CC. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother Theory Res Prac. 1982; 19, 12--288.Google Scholar
5. Bandura, A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. 1997. W.H. Freeman and Company: New York.Google Scholar
6. Davies, SC. Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer, 2014, The Health of the 51%: Women. 2015. Department of Health: London.Google Scholar
7. Hanson, MA, Bardsley, A, De-Regil, LM, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) recommendations on adolescent, preconception, and maternal nutrition: ‘Think Nutrition First’. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 131(Suppl. 4), S213–S253.Google Scholar
8. Inskip, H, Baird, J, Barker, M, et al. Influences on adherence to diet and physical activity recommendations in women and children: insights from six European studies. Ann Nutr Metab. 2014; 64, 332–339.Google Scholar
9. Phelan, S. Pregnancy: a teachable moment for weight control and obesity prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202, 135.e131–135.e138.Google Scholar
10. Cusatis, DC, Shannon, BM. Influences on adolescent eating behaviour. J Adolesc Health. 1996; 18, 27–34.Google Scholar
11. Michie, S, Abraham, C, Whittington, C, McAteer, J, Gupta, S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol. 2009; 28, 690–701.Google Scholar
12. Barker, M, Baird, J, Lawrence, W, et al. The Southampton Initiative for Health: a complex intervention to improve the diets and increase the physical activity levels of women from disadvantaged communities. J Health Psychol. 2011; 16, 178–191.Google Scholar
13. Lawrence, W, Black, C, Tinati, T, et al. ‘Making every contact count’: longitudinal evaluation of the impact of training in behaviour change on the work of health and social care practitioners. J Health Psychol. 2016; 21, 138–151.Google Scholar
14. Michie, S, van Stralen, MM, West, R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011; 6, 42.Google Scholar
15. Black, C, Lawrence, W, Cradock, S, et al. Healthy conversation skills: increasing competence and confidence in front-line staff. Public Health Nutr. 2014; 17, 700–707.Google Scholar
16. Baird, J, Jarman, M, Lawrence, W, et al. The effect of a behaviour change intervention on the diets and physical activity levels of women attending Sure Start Children’s Centres: results from a complex public health intervention. BMJ Open. 2014; 4, e005290.Google Scholar
17. Baird, J, Cooper, C, Margetts, BM, Barker, M, Inskip, H. Changing health behaviour of young women from disadvantaged backgrounds: evidence from systematic reviews. Proc Nutr Soc. 2009; 68, 195–204.Google Scholar
18. Okorodudu, DE, Bosworth, HB, Corsino, L. Innovative interventions to promote behavioral change in overweight or obese individuals: a review of the literature. Ann Med. 2015; 47, 179–185.Google Scholar
19. Dennison, L, Morrison, L, Conway, G, Yardley, L. Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behavior change: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15, e86.Google Scholar
20. O’Brien, OA, McCarthy, M, Gibney, ER, McAuliffe, FM. Technology-supported dietary and lifestyle interventions in healthy pregnant women: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014; 68, 760–766.Google Scholar
21. van Dijk, MR, Huijgen, NA, Willemsen, SP, Laven, JSE, Steegers, EA, Steegers-Theunissen, RP. m-Health improves nutrition and lifestyle of the reproductive population. J Med Internet Res. 2016; in press.Google Scholar
22. Yardley, L, Morrison, L, Bradbury, K, Muller, I. The person-based approach to intervention development. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17, e30.Google Scholar
23. Morrison, LG. Theory-based strategies for enhancing the impact and usage of digital health behaviour change interventions: a review. Digit Health. 2015; doi:10.1177/2055207615595335.Google Scholar
24. Dennison, L, Morrison, L, Lloyd, S, et al. Does brief telephone support improve engagement with a web-based weight management intervention? Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16, e95.Google Scholar
25. Lombard, C, Deeks, A, Jolley, D, Ball, K, Teede, H. A low intensity, community based lifestyle programme to prevent weight gain in women with young children: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010; 341, c3215.Google Scholar