Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:43:40.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DE-THAKSINIZING THAILAND: THE LIMITS OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2021

Abstract

Almost two decades after the initial victory of Thai Rak Thai, scholars still debate the forces behind Thaksin's rise to power. I revisit these debates and argue for a more explicit analysis of dynamics over time. I distinguish analytically between the founding moment of TRT's first victory and the subsequent reproduction of its dominance. I argue that TRT's financial muscle was a sufficient condition for its 2001 victory, that institutions merely contributed to the scale of its victory, and that its platform was not decisive. Once in power, however, institutions were instrumental in allowing TRT to complete its term, but more important for its long-term dominance was the rapid implementation of its campaign promises, which created a mass constituency that in turn made Thaksin-linked parties resilient at the polls despite institutional reforms designed to weaken their electoral performance.

Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the East Asia Institute.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aim, Sinpeng, and Kuhonta, Erik Martinez. 2012. “From the Street to the Ballot Box: The July 2011 Elections and the Rise of Social Movements in Thailand.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 34 (3): 389415.Google Scholar
Arghiros, Daniel. 2016. Democracy, Development and Decentralization in Provincial Thailand. Richmond: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askew, Marc. 2008. Performing Political Identity: The Democrat Party in Southern Thailand. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
Askew, Marc. 2010. “Confrontation and Crisis in Thailand, 2008–2010.” In Legitimacy Crisis in Thailand, edited by Askew, Marc, 3181. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
Beckert, Jens. 1996. “What Is Sociological about Economic Sociology? Uncertainty and the Embeddedness of Economic Action.” Theory and Society 25 (6): 803840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, William A. 2005. “Social Capital and Corruption: Vote Buying and the Politics of Reform in Thailand.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (3): 495508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Paul. 2005. “Evolving Toward What? Parties, Factions, and Coalition Behavior in Thailand Today.” Journal of East Asian Studies 5 (3): 495520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connors, Michael Kelly. 2005. “THAILAND: The Facts and F(r)ictions of Ruling.Southeast Asian Affairs, 365384.Google Scholar
Dressel, Björn. 2009. “Thailand's Elusive Quest for a Workable Constitution, 1997–2007.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 31 (2): 296325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glassman, Jim. 2004. “Economic ‘Nationalism’ in a Post-Nationalist Era.” Critical Asian Studies 36 (1): 3764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan. 2000. The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Hewison, Kevin. 2004. “Crafting Thailand's New Social Contract.” The Pacific Review 17 (4): 503522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewison, Kevin. 2010. “Thaksin Shinawatra and the Reshaping of Thai Politics.” Contemporary Politics 16 (2): 119133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewison, Kevin. 2014. “Considerations on Inequality and Politics in Thailand.” Democratization 21 (5): 846866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewison, Kevin. 2017. “Reluctant Populists: Learning Populism in Thailand.” International Political Science Review 38 (4): 426440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2006a. “Stuck in the Mud: Parties and Party Systems in Democratic Southeast Asia.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 2 (2): 2346.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2006b. “Party Fabrication: Constitutional Reform and the Rise of Thai Rak Thai.” Journal of East Asian Studies 6 (3): 381407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2007a. “The 2007 Thai Constitution: A Return to Politics Past.” Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 19 (1): 128160.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2007b. “Omitted Variables, Intent, and Counterfactuals: A Response to Michael H. Nelson.” Journal of East Asian Studies 7 (1): 149158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2013. “Late to the Party: The Development of Partisanship in Thailand.” TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia 1 (2): 199213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2016. “Thailand's Containment Constitution.” New Mandala (blog). April 28.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2019. “Calculating the Party List Seats--UPDATED.” Thai Data Points (blog). June 7.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen, and Pundit, Bangkok. 2016. “The Effects of Thailand's Proposed Electoral System.” ThaiDataPoints (blog). February 9.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen, and Selway, Joel. 2012. “Forcing the Genie Back in the Bottle: Sociological Change, Institutional Reform, and Health Policy in Thailand.” Journal of East Asian Studies 12 (1): 5788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasian, Tejapira. 2006. “Toppling Thaksin.New Left Review 39 (May–June): 537.Google Scholar
Khemthong, Tonsakulrungruang. 2018. “Thailand: The State of Liberal Democracy.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16 (2): 643651.Google Scholar
Kitti, Prasirtsuk. 2007. “From Political Reform and Economic Crisis to Coup d’état in Thailand: The Twists and Turns of the Political Economy, 1997–2006.” Asian Survey 47 (6): 872893.Google Scholar
Kitti, Prasirtsuk. 2015. “Thailand in 2014: Another Coup, a Different Coup?Asian Survey 55 (1): 200206.Google Scholar
Kuhonta, Erik Martinez. 2008. “The Paradox of Thailand's 1997 ‘People's Constitution’: Be Careful What You Wish For.” Asian Survey 48 (3): 373392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhonta, Erik Martinez. 2011. The Institutional Imperative: The Politics of Equitable Development in Southeast Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhonta, Erik Martinez. 2015. “Thailand's Feckless Parties and Party System.” In Party System Institutionalization in Asia: Democracies, Autocracies, and the Shadows of the Past, edited by Hicken, Allen and Kuhonta, Erik Martinez, 280306. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Andrew. 2001. “Institutions and Investors: The Politics of the Economic Crisis in Southeast Asia.” International Organization 55 (1): 81122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCargo, Duncan, Alexander, Saowanee T., and Desatova, Petra. 2017. “Ordering Peace: Thailand's 2016 Constitutional Referendum.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 39 (1): 6595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCargo, Duncan, and Ukrist, Pathmanand. 2005. The Thaksinization of Thailand. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar
Montesano, Michael J. 2007. “THAILAND: A Reckoning with History Begins.” Southeast Asian Affairs, 311339.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael H. 2001. “Thailand's House Elections of 6 January 2001: Thaksin's Landslide Victory and Subsequent Narrow Escape.” In Thailand's New Politics: KPI Yearbook 2001, edited by Nelson, Michael H., 283441. Nonthaburi and Bangkok: King Prajadhipok's Institute and White Lotus Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael H. 2007. “Institutional Incentives and Informal Local Political Groups (Phuak) in Thailand: Comments on Allen Hicken and Paul Chambers.” Journal of East Asian Studies 7 (1): 125147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Michael H. 2011. “Looking Back Before the Election of 2011: Thailand's Constitutional Referendum and the Election of 2007.” European-Asian Journal of Law and Governance 1 (11): 4974.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ockey, James. 1994. “Political Parties, Factions, and Corruption in Thailand.” Modern Asian Studies 28 (2): 251277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ockey, James. 2000. “The Rise of Local Power in Thailand: Provincial Crime, Elections and the Bureaucracy.” In Money & Power in Provincial Thailand, edited by McVey, Ruth, 7496. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Ockey, James. 2003. “Change and Continuity in the Thai Political Party System.” Asian Survey 43: 663680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasuk, Phongpaichit, and Baker, Chris. 2002. Thailand: Economy and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pasuk, Phongpaichit, and Baker, Chris. 2004. Thaksin: The Business of Politics in Thailand. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
Pasuk, Phongpaichit, and Baker, Chris. 2013. “Reviving Democracy at Thailand's 2011 Election.” Asian Survey 53 (4): 607628.Google Scholar
Porphant, Ouyyanont. 2008. “The Crown Property Bureau in Thailand and the Crisis of 1997.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 38 (1): 166189.Google Scholar
Prajak, Kongkirati. 2014. “The Rise and Fall of Electoral Violence in Thailand: Changing Rules, Structures and Power Landscapes, 1997–2011.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 36 (3): 386416.Google Scholar
Prajak, Kongkirati. 2016. “Thailand's Failed 2014 Election: The Anti-Election Movement, Violence and Democratic Breakdown.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 46 (3): 467485.Google Scholar
Selway, Joel. 2011. “Electoral Reform and Public Policy Outcomes in Thailand: The Politics of the 30-Baht Health Scheme.” World Politics 63 (1): 165202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selway, Joel, and Hicken, Allen. 2019a. “Estimating the True Decline in Support for Pheu Thai: The Effect of Electoral Reform.” ThaiDataPoints (blog). May 8.Google Scholar
Selway, Joel, and Hicken, Allen. 2019b. “The Thai Raksa Chart Penalty: How the Decision to Split Pheu Thai Affected Final Vote Share.” ThaiDataPoints (blog). May 28.Google Scholar
Somchai, Phatharathananunth. 2008. “The Thai Rak Thai Party and Elections in North-Eastern Thailand.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 38 (1): 106123.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51 (2): 273286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar