Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:17:40.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Occupy Congress in Taiwan: Political Opportunity, Threat, and the Sunflower Movement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2016

Ming-sho Ho
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In opposition to a free trade pact with China, Taiwan's Sunflower Movement erupted in spring 2014 and occupied the national legislature for twenty-four days. Drawing from the recent debates on the relation between social movements and the state, I elaborate a revised polity model that focuses on the effects of elite disunity, threat, and movement strategy. The Sunflower Movement originated from a tactical misstep by the ruling party that created an immediate sense of threat from proposed closer economic ties with China, thereby facilitating protest mobilization. Student protesters were able to seize the national legislature because of an internal split within the ruling party and support from the opposition party. However, the failure to further exploit these favorable opportunities exposed the movement to government repression. Fortunately for the movement, the disunity among elites helped the activists manage a dignified exit, which they could claim as a success.

Keywords

political opportunitythreatSunflower MovementCross-Strait Service Trade Agreement
Type
Special Section: Contentious Politics in China and Taiwan
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , April 2015 , pp. 69 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

References

Amenta, Edwin, and Halfmann, Drew. 2012. “Opportunity Knocks: The Trouble with Political Opportunity and What You Can Do About It.” In Contention in Context: Political Opportunities and the Emergence of Protest, ed. Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. M., 227–239. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 1994. Neither Gods nor Emperors: Students and the Struggle for Democracy in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Yun-han. 2011. “Navigating Between China and the United States: Taiwan's Politics of Identity.” In Taiwanese Identity Politics in the Twenty-First Century, ed. Schubert, G. and Damm, J., 133–154. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). 2014. The 2014 China Policy Review: Summary Report. Taipei: DPP.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, and McAdam, Doug. 2012. A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Yang-chih et al. 2014. Summary Report of Taiwan Social Change Survey: The Fourth Year of the Sixth Round (in Chinese). Taipei: Academia Sinica Institute of Sociology.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. 2004. “More Social Movements or Fewer? Beyond Political Opportunity Structures to Relational Fields.” Theory and Society 33: 333–365.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. “Threat (and Opportunity): Popular Action and State Response in the Dynamics of Contentious Action.” In Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, 179–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, and Jasper, James M. 1999. “Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory.” Sociological Forum 14: 27–55.Google Scholar
Ho, Ming-sho. 2014a. “The Resurgence of Social Movements Under the Ma Ying-jeou Government: A Political Opportunity Structure Perspective.” In Political Changes in Taiwan Under Ma Ying-jeou: Partisan Conflict, Policy Choices, External Constraints and Security Challenges, ed. Cabestan, J. and DeLisle, J., 100–119. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ho, Ming-sho. 2014b. “The Fukushima Effect: Explaining the Recent Resurgence of the Anti-Nuclear Movement in Taiwan.” Environmental Politics 26, 3: 965–983.Google Scholar
Jasper, James M. 2004. “A Strategic Approach to Collective Action: Looking for Agency in Social-Movement Choices.” Mobilization 9, 1: 1–16.Google Scholar
Jasper, James M. 2012. “Introduction: From Political Opportunity Structures to Strategic Interaction.” In Contention in Context: Political Opportunities and the Emergence of Protest, ed. Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. M., 1–33. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Keng, Shu, and Schubert, Gunter. 2010. “Agents of Taiwan-China Unification? The Political Roles of Taiwanese Business People in the Process of Cross-Strait Integration.” Asian Survey 50, 2: 287–310.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud, and Statham, Paul. 1999. “Ethnic and Civic Conceptions of Nationhood and the Differential Success of the Extreme Right in Germany and Italy.” In How Social Movements Matter, ed. Giugni, M., McAdam, D., and Tilly, C., 225–251. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2004. “Political Context and Opportunity.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, ed. Snow, D., Soule, S. A., and Kriesi, H., 67–90. Oxford: Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
Kurzman, Charles. 1996. “Structural Opportunity and Perceived Opportunity in Social Movement Theory: The Iranian Revolution of 1979.” American Sociological Review 61, 1: 153–170.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristian. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Maguire, Diarmuid. 1995. “Opposition Movements and Opposition Parties: Equal Partners or Dependent Relations in the Struggle for Power and Reform.” In The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements, ed. Jenkins, J. C. and Klandermans, B., 199–228. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1996. “Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, ed. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., and Zald, M. N., 23–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, David S. 1990. A Winter of Discontent: The Nuclear Freeze and American Politics. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Moodie, T. Dunbar. 2002. “Mobilization on the South African Gold Mines.” In Social Movements: Identity, Culture, and the State, ed. Meyer, D. S., Whittier, N., and Robnett, B., 47–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1986. “Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to Democracy.” In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, ed. O'Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. C., and Whitehead, L., 47–64. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rucht, Dieter. 1996. “German Unification, Democratization, and the Role of Movements: A Missed Opportunity?” Mobilization 1, 1: 35–62.Google Scholar
Schubert, Gunter, and Braig, Stefan. 2011. “How to Face an Embracing China: The DPP's Identity Politics and Cross-Strait Relations During and After the Chen Shui-bia Era.” In Taiwanese Identity Politics in the Twenty-First Century, ed. Schubert, G. and Damm, J., 72–94. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sonoda, Shigeto. 2012. “Contending Models for China's Future Development: Society Building and Governance.” Paper presented at the Fifth International Forum for Contemporary Chinese Studies, August 8–9, Beijing.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1989. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy 1965–75. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1996. “States and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, ed. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., and Zald, M. N., 41–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2007. Contentious Politics. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Wright, Teresa. 2001. The Perils of Protest: State Repression and Student Activism in China and Taiwan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar