Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:19:16.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Party System Fragmentation in Indonesia: The Subnational Dimension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Dirk Tomsa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this article I analyze the extent and causes of party system fragmentation in Indonesia's provincial and district parliaments. Focusing on the results of the first three post-Suharto elections in 1999, 2004, and 2009, I first highlight that local-level fragmentation is not only generally higher than national-level fragmentation but also that it has consistently increased over the three elections and that fragmentation has been particularly high in Eastern Indonesia. I then explain these three trends as a result of three main factors: First, electoral institutions applied between 1999 and 2009 facilitated fragmentation and poor party system institutionalization, mainly due to the introduction of an open list system in 2009 and the absence of a parliamentary threshold at the local level. Second, low levels of party institutionalization progressively individualized local party politics and made it normal for candidates to switch to smaller parties if it suited their interests, thereby exacerbating fragmentation. Third, electoral campaigning for local parliaments has been dominated by traditional methods based on personal relationships and networks rather than lavish public relations campaigns with expensive TV ads, further reinforcing the effects of the first two factors.

Keywords

Indonesiaparty systempartieselectionsdemocratizationdemocracyinstitutionalizationlocal politics
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , August 2014 , pp. 249 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

References

Ambardi, Kuskridho. 2008. “The Making of the Indonesian Multiparty System: A Cartelized Party System and Its Origin.” PhD diss., Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Aspinall, Edward. 2011. “Democratization and Ethnic Politics in Indonesia: Nine Theses.” Journal of East Asian Studies 11, 2: 289–319.Google Scholar
Aspinall, Edward. 2013. “A Nation in Fragments.” Critical Asian Studies 45, 1: 27–54.Google Scholar
Buehler, Michael. 2012. “Indonesia's New Election Law to Stall Reform Post-2014.” Oxford Analytica Daily Brief, May 1.Google Scholar
Buehler, Michael. 2013. “Married with Children.” Inside Indonesia 112 (April–June).Google Scholar
Buehler, Michael, and Tan, Paige Johnson. 2007. “Party-Candidate Relationships in Indonesian Local Politics: A Case Study of the 2005 Regional Elections in Gowa, South Sulawesi Province.” Indonesia 84: 41–69.Google Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep, and Kollman, Ken. 2004. The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Jungug. 2010. “District Magnitude, Social Diversity, and Indonesia's Parliamentary Party System from 1999 to 2009.” Asian Survey 50, 4: 663–683.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croissant, Aurel, and Voelkel, Philip. 2012. “Party System Types and Party System Institutionalization: Comparing New Democracies in East and Southeast Asia.” Party Politics 18, 2: 235–265.Google Scholar
Detiknews. 2013. “PBB & PKPI Lolos ke Pemilu 2014, KPU Jangan Sembrono Hadapi Pencalegan.” March 25.Google Scholar
Erb, Maribeth, and Sulistiyanto, Priyambudi, eds. 2009. Deepening Democracy in Indonesia? Direct Elections for Local Leaders (Pilkada). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Fox, Colm. 2013. “Personal Charisma and Electoral Campaigning in Local Indonesian Elections.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Asian Studies, San Diego, March 21–24.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Jon, and Aspinall, Edward. 2013. Comparing Across Regions: Parties and Political Systems in Indonesia and the Pacific Islands. CDI Policy Papers on Political Governance. Canberra: Centre for Democratic Institutions.Google Scholar
Hadiz, Vedi R. 2010. Localizing Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2009. Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen, and Kuhonta, Erik Martinez. 2011. “Shadows from the Past: Party System Institutionalization in Asia.” Comparative Political Studies 44, 5: 572–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 2013. Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson Tan, Paige. 2006. “Indonesia Seven Years After Soeharto: Party System Institutionalization in a New Democracy.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 28, 1: 88–114.Google Scholar
Johnson Tan, Paige. 2013. “Anti-Party Attitudes in Southeast Asia.” In Party Politics in Southeast Asia: Clientelism and Electoral Competition in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines, ed. Tomsa, Dirk and Ufen, Andreas, 80–100. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “The Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12, 1: 3–27.Google Scholar
Indonesia, Lembaga Survei. 2012. Survei Kerukunan Umat Beragama di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara dan Maluku. Unpublished public opinion survey. Jakarta: LSI.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan. 2007. “Institutionalization of Party Systems? Stability and Fluidity Among Legislative Parties in Africa's Democracies.” Government and Opposition 42, 2: 215–241.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott P., and Scully, Timothy R. 1995. “Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott P. and Scully, Timothy R., 1–34. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mietzner, Marcus. 2008. “Comparing Indonesia's Party Systems of the 1950s and the Post-Suharto Era: From Centrifugal to Centripetal Inter-Party Competition.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 39, 3: 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mietzner, Marcus. 2009a. Indonesia's 2009 Elections: Populism, Dynasties and the Consolidation of the Party System. Sydney: Lowy Institute.Google Scholar
Mietzner, Marcus. 2009b. “Political Opinion Polling in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: Catalyst or Obstacle to Democratic Consolidation?” Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land en Volkenkunde, 165, 1: 95–126.Google Scholar
Mietzner, Marcus. 2013. Money, Power, and Ideology: Political Parties in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia. Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Mogens N. 1979. “The Dynamics of European Party Systems: Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility.” European Journal of Political Research 7, 1: 1–26.Google Scholar
Protsyk, Oleh, and Wilson, Andrew. 2003. “Centre Politics in Russia and Ukraine: Patronage, Power, and Virtuality.” Party Politics 9, 6: 703–727.Google Scholar
Randall, Vicky, and Svåsand, Lars. 2002. “Party Institutionalization in New Democracies.” Party Politics 8, 1: 5–29.Google Scholar
Reilly, Benjamin. 2006. Democracy and Diversity: Political Engineering in the Asia-Pacific. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schakel, Arjan H. 2013. “Congruence Between Regional and National Elections.” Comparative Political Studies 46, 5: 631–662.Google Scholar
Schulte Nordholt, Henk, and van Klinken, Gerry, eds. 2007. Renegotiating Boundaries: Local Politics in Post-Suharto Indonesia. Leiden: KITLV.Google Scholar
Shabad, Goldie, and Słomczyński, Kazimierz M. 2004. “Inter-Party Mobility Among Parliamentary Candidates in Post-Communist East Central Europe.” Party Politics 10, 2: 151–176.Google Scholar
Slater, Dan. 2004. “Indonesia's Accountability Trap: Party Cartels and Presidential Power After Democratic Transition.” Indonesia 78: 61–92.Google Scholar
Suara Pembaruan. 2012. “Partai Terlalu Banyak Tak Produktif untuk Negara Demokratis.” February 16.Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew S. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thorlakson, Lori. 2007. “An Institutional Explanation of Party System Congruence: Evidence from Six Federations.” European Journal of Political Research 46, 1: 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomsa, Dirk. 2008. Party Politics and Democratization in Indonesia: Golkar in the Post-Suharto Era. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tomsa, Dirk. 2010. “The Indonesian Party System After the 2009 Elections: Towards Stability?” In Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society, ed. Aspinall, Edward and Mietzner, Marcus, 141–159. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Ufen, Andreas. 2010. “Electoral Campaigning in Indonesia: The Professionalization and Commercialization After 1998.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 29, 4: 11–37.Google Scholar
Ufen, Andreas. 2013. “Lipset and Rokkan in Southeast Asia: Indonesia in Comparative Perspective.” In Party Politics in Southeast Asia: Clientelism and Electoral Competition in Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines, ed. Tomsa, Dirk and Ufen, Andreas, 40–61. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wolinetz, Steven B. 2006. “Party System Institutionalization: Bringing the System Back In.” Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Saskatoon, May 29–June 1. http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2007/Wolinetz.pdf.Google Scholar