Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:49:58.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Connections and Firm Performance: The Case of Hong Kong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Stan Hok-Wui Wong
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Business interests are overrepresented in Hong Kong's nominally democratic political institutions. Many in Hong Kong perceive this as evidence of the existence of “collusion between government and business,” a phenomenon that has stirred public concerns in the city since its sovereignty transfer. Although anecdotal accounts abound, no systematic analysis has been conducted to evaluate the validity of this perception. In this article I use a rich firm-level dataset to offer the first systematic assessment of the effects of political connections on firm performance in Hong Kong. I define politically connected firms as firms that have stakeholders concurrently holding a seat on the Election Committee, a constitutional body that elects the city's chief executive. I found evidence, though not overwhelming, consistent with the “collusion” hypothesis: political connections do improve firm performance measured by return on equity and market-to-book ratio. The improvement is unlikely due to unobserved confounding factors such as firms' inherent ability. As for the origin of the political connections, the data show that a firm's economic power has little predictive value of its connections to the Election Committee. Rather, number of employees matters; firms that hire fewer workers were more likely to gain a seat on the 1997 Election Committee. This result may suggest that Beijing plays a more dominant role in the formation of political connections—that serve Beijing's co-optation needs rather than the interests of powerful firms that may have a desire to “capture” the state.

Keywords

Hong Kong politicsHong Kong economyauthoritarian politicspolitically connected firmscrony capitalism
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , August 2010 , pp. 275 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

References

Agrawal, Anup, and Knoeber, Charles R. 2001. “Do Some Outside Directors Play a Political Role?” Journal of Law and Economics 44, 1: 179–198.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89, 3: 634–647.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Claessens, Stijin, Djankov, Simeon, and Lang, Larry H. P. 2000. “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations.” Journal of Financial Economics 58, 1–2: 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faccio, Mara. 2006. “Political Connected Firms.” American Economic Review 96, 1: 369–386.Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene F., and French, Kenneth R. 1995. “Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns.” Journal of Finance 50, 1: 131–155.Google Scholar
Fan, Joseph P. H., Wong, T. J., and Zhang, Tianyu. 2007. “Politically Connected CEOs, Corporate Governance, and Post IPO Performance of China's Newly Partially Privatized Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics 84, 2: 330–357.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Thomas, and Voth, Hans-Joachim. 2008. “Betting on Hitler: The Value of Political Connections in Nazi Germany.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123, 1: 101–137.Google Scholar
Fisman, Raymond. 2001. “Estimating the Value of Political Connections.” American Economic Review 91, 4: 1095–1102.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Przeworski, Adam. 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies 40, 11: 1279–1301.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2, 1: 115–144.Google Scholar
Goldman, Eitan, Rocholl, Jorg, and So, Jongil. 2009. “Do Politically Connected Boards Affect Firm Value?” Review of Financial Studies 22, 6: 2331–2360.Google Scholar
Goodstadt, Leo F. 2005. Uneasy Partners: The Conflict Between Public Interest and Private Profit in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Holliday, Ian, Ngok, Ma, and Yep, Ray. 2002. “A High Degree of Autonomy? Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 1997–2002.” Political Quarterly 73, 4: 455–464.Google Scholar
Holliday, Ian, Ngok, Ma, and Yep, Ray. 2004. “After 1997: The Dialectics of Hong Kong Dependence.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 34, 2: 254–271.Google Scholar
Johnson, Simon, and Mitton, Todd. 2003. “Cronyism and Capital Controls: Evidence from Malaysia.” Journal of Financial Economics 67, 2: 351–382.Google Scholar
Johnston, Jack, and DiNardo, John. 1997. Econometric Methods. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Khwaja, Asim Ijaz, and Mian, Atif. 2005. “Do Lenders Favor Politically Connected Firms? Rent Provision in an Emerging Financial Market.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120, 4: 1371–1411.Google Scholar
King, Ambrose Yeo-chi. 1973. “The Administrative Absorption of Politics in Hong Kong, with Special Emphasis on the City District Officer Scheme.” Social Research Centre. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Kuan, Hsin-chi. 1991. “Power Dependence and Democratic Transition: The Case of Hong Kong.” China Quarterly 128, 4: 774–793.Google Scholar
Li, Hongbin, Lingsheng, Meng, and Zhang, Junsen. 2006. “Why Do Entrepreneurs Enter Politics? Evidence from China.” Economy Inquiry 44, 3: 559–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Hongbin, Liu, Pak Wai, Zhang, Junsen, and Ma, Ning. 2007. “Economic Returns to Communist Party Membership: Evidence from Urban Chinese Twins.” The Economic Journal 117: 1504–1520.Google Scholar
Li, Pang-kwong. 2007. “The Executive.” In Contemporary Hong Kong Politics: Governance in the Post-1997 Era, ed. Wai-man, Lam, Lui, Percy Luen-tim, Wong, Wilson, and Holliday, Ian, 23–37. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Lo, Sonny Shiu-Hing. 2001. Governing Hong Kong: Legitimacy, Communication, and Political Decay. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Lo, Sonny Shiu-Hing. 2008. The Dynamics of Beijing-Hong Kong Relations: A Model for Taiwan? Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Loh, Christine. 2006. Functional Constituencies: A Unique Feature of the Hong Kong Legislative Council. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2008. “Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies 31, 4–5: 715–741.Google Scholar
Pepper, Suzanne. 2000. “Elections, Political Change, and Basic Law Government: The Hong Kong System in Search of a Political Form.” China Quarterly 162: 410–438.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1974. “Theories of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 5, 2: 335–358.Google Scholar
Scott, Ian. 2000. “The Disarticulation of Hong Kong's Post-Handover Political System.” China Journal 43, 1: 29–53.Google Scholar
Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W. 1993. “Corruption.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 3: 599–617.Google Scholar
Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W. 2002. The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
So, Alvin Y. 1999. Hong Kong's Embattled Democracy: A Societal Analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2, 1: 3–21.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Public Economics 76, 3: 399–458.Google Scholar
Yep, Ray. 2007. “The Links with the Mainland.” In Contemporary Hong Kong Politics: Governance in the Post-1997 Era, ed. Wai-man, Lam, Lui, Percy Luen-tim, Wong, Wilson, and Holliday, Ian, 245–264. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, Suisheng. 1998. “A State-Led Nationalism: The Patriotic Education Campaign in Post-Tiananmen China.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 31, 3: 287–302.Google Scholar