Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:33:35.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voter Demands for Patronage: Evidence from Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2016

Jae Hyeok Shin
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this article I seek to explain the microfoundations of patronage politics in the developing world. Two distinct approaches have evolved in the literature. One puts emphasis on the demand side, arguing that patronage persists because poor voters tend to desire individualistic goods over policy. The other focuses on the supply side: few politicians offer programmatic policy, so voters have no alternative but to vote for the politicians who distribute patronage. In this study I test those competing theories using original data from Jakarta, Indonesia. I find evidence supporting the demand-side theory: when both patronage and policy are offered, poor, less-educated voters tend to demand patronage, such as jobs and money, over national programs like free education and universal health care, whereas well-off, better-educated voters tend to prefer the national policies. However, the study also reveals that demands for patronage are affected by level of participation in politics: those who voted in previous elections and those who affiliate with a political party are more likely to demand patronage. This microfoundational evidence helps to explain the persistence of patronage politics in places of widespread poverty.

Keywords

patronage politicsvoter demandspolitical participationdeveloping worldIndonesia
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , April 2015 , pp. 127 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

References

Arriola, Leonardo R. 2009. “Patronage and Political Stability in Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 42, 10: 1339–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bünte, Marco, and Croissant, Aurel. 2011. The Crisis of Democratic Governance in Southeast Asia. Critical Studies of the Asia Pacific Series. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market.” American Journal of Political Science 48, 4: 742–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Chuan-hsien. 2007. “Politics of Defection.” PhD diss., University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, and Duflo, Esther. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72, 5: 1409–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corstange, Daniel. N.D. The Price of a Vote: Ethnicity and Clientelism in the Middle East. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Desposato, Scott W. 2006. “Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party Switching in Brazil's Chamber of Deputies.” American Journal of Political Science 50, 1: 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
East-Asian Barometer. 2006. “Instrumen Survei: Konsolidasi Demokrasi” [Survey questionnaire: Democratic consolidation]. Lembaga Survei Indonesia [Indonesian Survey Institute].Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, Edmund Terence, and Jomo, K. S. 1997. Malaysia's Political Economy: Politics, Patronage and Profits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hadiz, Vedi R. 2010. Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamayotsu, Kikue. 2004. “Islamisation, Patronage, and Political Ascendancy: The Politics and Business of Islam in Malaysia.” In The State of Malaysia: Ethnicity, Equity, and Reform, ed. Gomez, Edmund Terence, 229–252. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen D. 2009. Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen, and Simmons, Joel W. 2008. “The Personal Vote and the Efficacy of Education Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 52, 1: 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horiuchi, Yusaku, and Lee, Seungjoo. 2008. “The Presidency, Regionalism, and Distributive Politics in South Korea.” Comparative Political Studies 41, 6: 861–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IDEA (Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance). 2013. “Voter Turnout Data for Indonesia.” www.idea.int/vt/countryview.cfm?CountryCode=ID.Google Scholar
Kasuya, Yuko. 2009. Presidential Bandwagon: Parties and Party Systems in the Philippines. Pasig City, Philippines: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven I., eds. 2007. Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurer, Oskar. 2001. “Why Do Voters Support Corrupt Politicians?” In Political Economy of Corruption, ed. Jain, Arvind K., 63–86. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Landé, Carl H. 1965. “Leaders, Factions, and Parties: The Structure of Philippine Parties.” Monograph Series No. 6. New Haven, CT: Yale University Southeast Asia Studies.Google Scholar
Lemarchand, René. 1972. “Political Clientelism and Ethnicity in Tropical Africa.” American Political Science Review 66, 1: 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan, and Morrison, Minion. 2008. “Are African Voters Really Ethnic or Clientelistic? Survey Evidence from Ghana.” Political Science Quarterly 123, 1: 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyne, Mona M. 1999. “The Voter's Dilemma and Electoral Competition: Explaining Development Policy and Democratic Breakdown in Developing Democracies.” PhD diss., University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Lyne, Mona M. 2007. “Rethinking Economics and Institutions: The Voter's Dilemma and Democratic Accountability.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I., 159–181. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Allen H., and Richard, Scott F. 1981. “A Rational Choice of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89, 5: 914–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montinola, Gabriella R. 1999. “Parties and Accountability in the Philippines.” Journal of Democracy 10, 1: 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichter, Simeon. 2008. “Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot.” American Political Science Review 102, 1: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dwyer, Conor. 2006. Runaway State-Building: Patronage Politics and Democratic Development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olken, Benjamin A. 2007. “Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” Journal of Political Economy 115, 2: 200–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olken, Benjamin A. 2010. “Direct Democracy and Local Public Goods: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” American Political Science Review 104, 2: 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas B., William Liddle, R., and Mujani, Saiful. 2012. “Testing Islam's Political Advantage: Evidence from Indonesia.” American Journal of Political Science 56, 3: 584–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quimpo, Nathan Gilbert. 2005. “Review: Oligarchic Patrimonialism, Bossism, Electoral Clientelism, and Contested Democracy in the Philippines.” Comparative Politics 37, 2: 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quimpo, Nathan Gilbert. 2007. “The Philippines: Political Parties and Corruption.” Southeast Asian Affairs 10: 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richman, Jesse. 2011. “Parties, Pivots, and Policy: The Status Quo Test.” American Political Science Review 105, 1: 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James A., and Verdier, Thierry. 2013. “The Political Economy of Clientelism.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 115, 2: 260–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael. 2001. Timber Booms and Institutional Breakdown in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David J., and Shugart, Matthew S. 2010. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1972. Comparative Political Corruption. Contemporary Comparative Politics Series. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1977. The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sherlock, Stephen. 2004. “The 2004 Indonesian Elections: How the System Works and What the Parties Stand For.” Canberra: Centre for Democratic Institutions.Google Scholar
Shin, Jae Hyeok. 2013. “Voter Demands, Access to Resources, and Party Switching: Evidence from the South Korean National Assembly, 1988–2008.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 14, 4: 453–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Dan. 2006. “The Ironies of Instability in Indonesia.” Social Analysis 50, 1: 208–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99, 3: 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzi, Vito. 1998. “Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures.” IMF Staff Papers 45, 4: 559–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomsa, Dirk, and Ufen, Andreas, eds. 2013. Party Politics in Southeast Asia: Clientelism and Electoral Competition in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2007. “What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research?” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 211–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ufen, Andreas. 2006. “Political Parties in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Between Politik Aliran and ‘Philippinisation.”’ German Institute of Global and Area Studies Working Paper No. 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungpakorn, J. G. 2002. “From Tragedy to Comedy: Political Reform in Thailand.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 32, 2: 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Walle, Nicolas. 2007. “Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss? The Evolution of Political Clientelism in Africa.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I., 50–67. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard. 2003. “Clientelism and Voting Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Benin.” World Politics 55, 3: 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar