Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:16:25.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Jesuits in Disguise’? Ritualist Confessors and their Critics in the 1870s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Nigel Yates
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The public controversy over ritualism in the Church of England reached its peak in the 1870s, with the passing of the Public Worship Regulation Act and the attempts, eventually abandoned through use of the episcopal veto, to prosecute ritualist clergy for the use of technically illegal ceremonial ornaments or vestments. One other related subject that caused a similar degree of controversy at the time, though it has been less well remembered since, was the emphasis within ritualist circles on auricular or sacramental confession. The subject of auricular confession, made privately to a priest, was one of the most explosive religious issues, both morally and theologically, of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Ecclesiastical History , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 202 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Marsh, P. T., The Victorian Church in Decline, London 1969, 111–34Google Scholar, 158-92, 218-41; Bentley, J., Ritualism and Politics in Victorian Britain, Oxford 1978, 20–128Google Scholar.

2 The official history is Embry, J., The Catholic Movement and the SSC, London 1931.Google Scholar

3 Yates, W. N., ‘Francis Henry Murray, rector of Chislehurst’, Archaeologia Cantiana xcviii (1983), 1–18.Google Scholar

4 Ellsworth, L. E., Charles Lowder and the Ritualist Movement, London 1982, 117-22, 138–46.Google Scholar

5 This paper had its origins in a communication on ‘Popular opposition to auricular confession in Victorian England’, read to a conference of the Commission Internationale d'Histoire Eccle'siastique Comparee at the University of Durham in September 1981. It has been revised and extended since then, and I am grateful to all those who have participated in this process especially the Revd Dr William Jacob and Dr David Hilliard, with whom I have discussed several of the issues considered.

6 Prynne, G. R., Private Confession, Penance and Absolution authoritatively taught in the Church of England, London 1852Google Scholar ; Greenwell, N., Priesthood, Confession and Absolution, London 1874Google Scholar.

7 Toon, P., Evangelical Theology 1833-1856: a response to Tractarianism, London 1979, 167–8.Google Scholar

8 Mutter, G., On Confession, Absolution and Penance, London 1828, 17, 28.Google Scholar

9 Purcell, E. S., Life of Cardinal Manning, London 1895, i. 496.Google Scholar

10 Northumberland Record Office, 2390/1, pp. 31-2, 45.

11 Yates, W. N., ‘Leeds and the Oxford Movement’, Publications of the Thortsby Society IV (1975). 35.Google Scholar

12 Walsh, W., Secret History of the Oxford Movement, London 1897, 401.Google Scholar

13 Chronicle of Convocation 1873, 364-88; ibid. 1877, 167-88, 209-10, 229-53, 310-36.

14 Yates, W. N., The Oxford Movement and Parish Life: St. Saviour's, Leeds, 1839-1929, York 1975. 12.Google Scholar

15 Convocation 1873, 558.

16 Ibid. 1877, 248.

17 Pusey, E. B., Advice for Those Who Exercise the Ministry of Reconciliation Through Confession and Absolution, London 1878, p. clxxiv.Google Scholar

18 Kent Archives Office, Ch71/A4, p. 157.

19 Ibid. 157-8.

20 Comber, T., A Companion to the Temple, London 1684Google Scholar ; Wheatly, C., The Church of England Man's Companion, Oxford 1710Google Scholar ; Nicholls, W., Commentary on the Book of Common Prayer, London 1712Google Scholar.

21 , Wheatly, op. cit. 163.Google Scholar

22 , Comber, op. cit. 61.Google Scholar

23 Hopkinson, S., Religious and Moral Reflections, London 1814, 27.Google Scholar

24 Brendon, P., Hurrell Froude and the Oxford Movement, London 1974, 69.Google Scholar

25 , Purcell, Manning, i. 490.Google Scholar

26 Yates, W. N., ‘Ritualist concepts of priestly vocation’, Studies in Church History XV (1978), 407-15.Google Scholar

27 Clark, G. S. R. Kitson, Churchmen and the Condition of England, London 1973.Google Scholar

28 Tracts for the Times iv (1833), 7.Google Scholar

29 Convocation 1877, 333.

30 Ibid. 334.

31 Burn, R., Ecclesiastical Law, London 1781, ii. 8.Google Scholar

32 Hennock, E. P., ‘The Anglo-Catholics and church extension in Victorian Brighton’, in Kitch, M. J. (ed.), Studies in Sussex Church History, Brighton 1981, 183.Google Scholar

33 Lowder, C. F., Sacramental Confession examined by Pastoral Experience, London 1874Google Scholar ; Dolling, R. R., Ten Years in A Portsmouth Slum, London 1897Google Scholar.

34 Cornford, E. B., Parish Book and Communicant's Roll, Portsmouth 1908, 97.Google Scholar

35 Convocation 1873, 375–8.

36 , Yates, Oxford Movement, 18Google Scholar

37 Kent, J., Holding the Fort, London 1978, 268.Google Scholar

38 Kent Archives Office, Ch71/A2, pp. 47, 125, 223.

39 Ibid. 237.

40 , Greenwell, Priesthood, 7.Google Scholar

41 , Yates, Oxford Movement, 13.Google Scholar

42 Ollard, S. L., A Short History of the Oxford Movement, London 1915, 94.Google Scholar

43 Baring, F., Astounding Revelations of Puseyism in Belgravia, London 1858.Google Scholar

44 , Walsh, Secret History, 119.Google Scholar

45 , Pusey, Advice, 108.Google Scholar

46 Hilliard, D., ‘Un-English and unmanly: Anglo-Catholicism and homosexuality’, Victorian Studies xxv (1982), 181–210.Google Scholar

47 Kent Archives Office, G171/A4, pp. 387-9. The society's archives include a printed copy of an address given to the May Synod in 1876 by a distinguished medical practitioner G. Cowell, entitled ‘The Influence of Health and Disease upon the Moral Condition’, which contained a detailed consideration of the medical effects of masturbation that was, by contemporary standards, remarkably progressive: ‘With regard to the permanent effect of self-abuse, there is no doubt that in boys who are healthy and strong it does not do much harm, but those who are weak, or have the germs of disease in some of their vital organs, die an early death, or grow up sickly and ill-developed. In those who continue it for a longer time disability or loss of brightness often occur, but by no means always, or there may be some arrest of growth, either of the whole body or certain parts of it. For instance, the brain may not fully develop; it may be small, and the intellectual faculties may proportionately suffer. If there be any pre-disposition to disease of the lungs, or of the heart, or of the brain, they may be roused into action. Hysteria, epilepsy, and other nervous disorders, may arise, and even occasionally different forms of insanity. But these are exceptions and not the rule; and I must admit that, although this sin is unnatural, vile and utterly degrading to beings made in the image of God — by whom, too, it is forbidden — yet permanant ill effects are, as compared with its frequency, rare…A similar practice to that of which I am speaking, also occurs among girls and young women, and with very similar results. I am afraid I am not in a position to speak authoritatively with reference to its frequency, but it is my present opinion that it is not so frequent as amongst members of the opposite sex.’ Cowell recommends the circumcision of boys to prevent masturbation, noting that’ this abuse is not nearly so common amongst the Jews’, Kent Archives Office, CI171/Z1, pp. 13-15.

48 Chambers, J. C., The Priest in Absolution, London 1866-1870, ii. 29.Google Scholar

49 Ibid. ii. 144.

50 Kent Archives Office, Ch71/A4, p. 309.

51 , Pusey, Advice, 357-8, 368.Google Scholar

52 Cusack, M. A., Five Tears in A Protestant Sisterhood, London 1869Google Scholar ; Goodman, M., Experience of an English Sister of Mercy, London 1862Google Scholar ; idem , Sisterhoods in the Church of England, London 1863Google Scholar.

53 Kent Archives Office, Ch71/A4, p. 158.

54 Convocation 1873, 364-88.

55 Ibid. 558.