Article contents
Religious Changes in Liverpool in the Nineteenth Century
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2011
Extract
The study of local history can contribute much to the understanding of religious changes in the nineteenth century, for, as Professor Asa Briggs has shown, each provincial city of Victorian England had its own distinguishing class structure and manner of life. Nonconformity was strong in Birmingham and Sheffield, towns of the steel and iron industry which was largely in the hands of small masters; Manchester with its cotton mills, its large proletariat and Irish immigrants, its wealthy employers and cosmopolitan merchants, was a very different society, marked not only by a dominant Dissent but also by a strong Roman Catholicism. Although Liverpool resembled Manchester in its wide class differences and its large number of Irish poor, it was a commercial rather than an industrial city. Moreover, unlike Manchester, it was an ancient incorporated borough and the activity of the town council in building churches in the eighteenth century during a period of great population growth (from about 10,000 in 1700 to 77,000 in 1801) appears to have been one factor in stemming the tide of Dissent, which was noticeably weaker in Liverpool than in the other three cities referred to above. In the nineteenth century the main religious issue at Liverpool was not Dissent versus the Establishment, but conflict between Protestantism and Roman Catholicism. Chartism, so powerful in other cities, appears to have taken second place to the sectarian conflict at Liverpool.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968
References
page 195 note 1 Briggs, Asa, Victorian Cities, London 1963, especially 66, 110–11, 120, 188–9, 204Google Scholar; Inglis, K. S., ‘Patterns of Religious Worship in 1851’, in this Journal, xi (1960), 81–3.Google Scholar
page 195 note 2 A cotton mill built in 1838 was the only one in the town: Baines, Thomas, History of the Commerce and Town of Liverpool, London 1852, 649.Google Scholar
page 195 note 3 Parliamentary Debates, lxii (1842), 1375.Google Scholar
page 195 note 4 See Liverpool Mercury, 26 August, 2 September, and 7 October 1842 for notice of meetings.
page 195 note 5 See Liverpool Mercury, 17 and 21 March 1848 for procession on St. Patrick's Day; and Schoyen, A. R., The Chartist Challenge, London 1958, 174Google Scholar for the request to suspend habeas corpus.
page 196 note 1 Touzeau, J., The Rise and Progress of Liverpool from 1551 to 1835, Liverpool 1910, ii. 872.Google Scholar
page 196 note 2 Articles of Enquiry, 1811: EDV 7/4/141, Cheshire County Record Office, Chester.
page 196 note 3 Hume, A., Condition of Liverpool, Religious and Social, Liverpool 1858, 7–8.Google Scholar
page 196 note 4 Calculated from ibid., 8.
page 196 note 5 Picton, J. A., Memorials of Liverpool, London 1875, ii. 72Google Scholar; Peet, H., Liverpool Vestry Books, Liverpool 1915, i. 458.Google Scholar
page 196 note 6 Hume, A., State and Prospects of the Church in Liverpool, Liverpool 1869, 9.Google Scholar
page 196 note 7 Hume, A., The Ecclesiatical Districts of Liverpool, Liverpool 1879.Google Scholar
page 197 note 1 Hume, A., The Ecclesiastical Districts of Liverpool, Liverpool 1879, 17.Google Scholar
page 197 note 2 £710 each in 1828; H. Peet, op. cit., ii. xxxix.
page 197 note 3 J. Touzeau, op. cit., ii. 795–9.
page 197 note 4 White, B. D., A History of the Corporation of Liverpool, 1835–1914, Liverpool 1951, 29.Google Scholar
page 197 note 5 J. Picton, op. cit., i. 514.
page 197 note 6 Orchard, B. G. (Liverpool Legion of Honour, Birkenhead 1893, 42–3Google Scholar) touches on some of these differences and the reason for them.
page 198 note 1 Murphy, James (The Religious Problem in English Education: The Crucial Experiment, Liverpool 1959Google Scholar) provides a definitive account of the two corporation schools and assesses the part played by Hugh McNeile, ‘the O'Connell of Protestantism’. See also Bourke, Thomas, Catholic History of Liverpool, Liverpool 1910, 68.Google Scholar
page 198 note 2 Argus, 1 February 1879 and Weekly Post, 1 February 1879.
page 198 note 3 Beaconsfield to the Queen, 10 April 1880, quoted in Liverpool Review, May 1933, 158.
page 198 note 4 Ryle, J. C. (A Charge Delivered to the Clergy, Liverpool 1887, 8Google Scholar) says that a few very large contributions made up the principal part of the endowment. See Buckle, G. E., Life of Benjamin Disraeli, Earl of Beaconsfield, London 1920, viGoogle Scholar. 549 for Disraeli's use of patronage.
page 198 note 5 Porcupine, 17 July 1880, 244.
page 198 note 6 ‘Lancashire Catholicism’, Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, Transactions, N.S. xviii (1902), 215.Google Scholar
page 198 note 6 Archdiocese of Liverpool Records, Lancashire Record Office, Preston. Articles of Enquiry,’ 1811: EDV 7/4/141, Cheshire County Record Office, gives 764 Roman Catholic out of 4,001 baptisms in 1810, that is 19–1 per cent.
page 198 note 7 Redford, Arthur, Labour Migration in England, 1800–1850, revised by W. H. Chaloner, Manchester 1964, 134.Google Scholar
page 199 note 1 Liverpool Courier, 2 March 1882. The estimate of the Roman Catholic bishop at the same date was 120,000 or 217 per cent of the population of Liverpool.
page 199 note 2 T. Bourke, op. cit., 66, 75, 210.
page 199 note 3 Calculated from Visitation Records (1865), Archdiocese of Liverpool, Lancashire Record Office.
page 199 note 4 T. Bourke, op. cit., 36.
page 199 note 5 Ibid., 178, 197.
page 199 note 6 Anstruther, G. E. and Hallett, P. E., Catholic Truth Society: the First Fifty Years, London 1934, 29–30.Google Scholar
page 199 note 7 Duncan, W. H. M.D., ‘On the Physical Causes of the High Rate of Mortality in Liverpool’: Parliamentary Papers, 1844, xvii. 531.Google Scholar
page 200 note 1 Prince's Park was established by Richard Vaughan Yates in 1843 and placed by him under a Trust. There was no municipal park until 1856.
page 200 note 2 Second Report of the Commissioners for Enquiring into the State of Large Towns, Parliamentary Papers, 1845, xviii. 323.
page 200 note 3 Squalid Liverpool by a Special Commissioner, Liverpool 1883, 37.Google Scholar
page 200 note 4 Edward Rush ton to Secretary of State, 21 April 1849, Parliamentary Papers, 1849, xlvii. 53–4.
page 200 note 5 T. Bourke, op. cit., 171.
page 200 note 6 Relatio Status Animarum Diocesis Liverpolitana, Archdiocese of Liverpool Records, Lancashire Record Office.
page 200 note 7 T. Burke, op. cit., 79.
page 201 note 1 See Inglis, K. S., Churches and the Working Classes in Victorian England, London 1963, 131–5.Google Scholar
page 201 note 2 See Catholic Times, 30 October 1891.
page 201 note 3 T. Burke, op. cit., 57.
page 201 note 4 Hume, A., Visiting List of the Parish of Vauxhall, Liverpool, Liverpool 1877.Google Scholar
page 201 note 5 Visitation of 1855 and Relatio Status Animarum of 1896, Archdiocese of Liverpool Records, Lancashire Record Office.
page 201 note 6 T. Burke, op. cit., 71.
page 201 note 7 Ibid., 204.
page 201 note 8 Liverpool Daily Post, 15 January 1872.
page 202 note 1 Calculated from figures in Catholic Times, 30 October 1891.
page 202 note 2 In 1872 bishop Goss said there were 150,000–200,000 Roman Catholics in Liverpool. For discussion of the census figures see the Appendix.
page 202 note 3 Calculated from Articles of Enquiry, 1811: EDV 7/4/141, Cheshire County Record Office.
page 202 note 4 As some people attended church more than once on the same day, the number of attenders was less than the total of attendances. In 1851, but not at subsequent dates, afternoon attendances are included; in 1881 and 1902, only morning and evening attendances. Afternoon congregations were already small in 1851 and dwindled thereafter. Sources used were: Census of Great Britain, 1851, Religious Worship, England and Wales, Report and Tables, London 1853Google Scholar; Liverpool Daily Post, 3 and 15 November 1881, 11 November 1902.
page 202 note 5 See the article by Ronald Goldman in New Society, 27 May 1965; also Sandford, C. T. and Griffin, S., ‘Religious Belief and Church Attendance of Students at a College of Science and Technology’, Church Quarterly Review, clxvi (1965), 337–43.Google Scholar
page 203 note 1 Mann, Horace, ‘on the Statistical Position of the Religious Bodies in England and Wales’, Journal of the Statistical Society of London, xviii (1855), 152–3.Google Scholar
page 203 note 2 As the Liverpool Daily Post enumerators attended only the 11 a.m. Mass, Roman Catholic figures are from the Catholic Times of 30 October 1891, and Roman Catholic evening attendance as given in the Post (9,442) is not included.
page 203 note 3 Mudie-Smith, R. (ed.), The Religious Life of London, London 1904, 15.Google Scholar
page 203 note 4 H. Mann (in Census of Great Britain, 1851, cxxi) suggests 30 per cent as unavoidably absent; Mudie-Smith considers it was 50 per cent in 1902–3.
page 203 note 5 Argyle, Michael, Religious Behaviour, London 1958, 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 204 note 1 Holt, Anne, A Ministry to the Poor, Liverpool 1937, 16 ff.Google Scholar
page 204 note 2 Porcupine, 17 May 1873, 102.
page 204 note 3 Hume, A., The Church of England: the Home Missionary to the Poor, London 1862Google Scholar, passim.
page 204 note 4 B. G. Orchard, op. cit., 42–3.
page 205 note 1 Sellers, Ian, ‘Nonconformist Attitudes in Later Nineteenth Century Liverpool’ Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, Transactions, 114 (1962), 215–40.Google Scholar
page 205 note 2 Porcupine, 31 May 1873, 138.
page 205 note 3 Wesley an Home Mission, Liverpool, Annual Reports, 1876–95: a visit to the Liverpool Wesleyan Mission by a London Journalist, London 1896, 16, 34–5.Google Scholar
page 205 note 4 Hume, A., Condition of Liverpool, Religious and Social, Liverpool 1858, 9.Google Scholar
page 205 note 5 Calculation for 1902 based on figures of accommodation given in Liverpool Daily Post, 11 November 1902, and population of Liverpool as given in the civil census of 1901.
page 205 note 6 Liverpool Mercury, 16 February 1882; Ryle, J. C., Our Position and Our Dangers, London 1885, 10.Google Scholar
page 205 note 7 Hughes, Quentin, Seaport, Architecture and Townscape in Liverpool, Liverpool 1964, 7.Google Scholar
page 205 note 8 Evidence of Hume, Abraham, Parliamentary Papers, 1857–8, ix. 497.Google Scholar
page 206 note 1 Report of the Bishop of Liverpool's Commission to Enquire into the Spiritual Needs of the. Diocese, Liverpool 1903.Google Scholar
page 206 note 2 Liverpool Daily Post, 2 November 1881 and Liverpool Courier, 2 March 1882, correspondence from A. Hume.
page 206 note 3 A. Hume, Condition of Liverpool, 8.
page 206 note 4 Ryle, J. C., Address to Liverpool Diocesan Conference, Liverpool 1890, 10.Google Scholar
page 206 note 5 A. Hume, Condition of Liverpool, 8.
page 206 note 6 H. Peet (ed.), op cit., ii. 411–12.
page 206 note 7 Full Report of a Conference of Working Men, Clergy, and Others held in Hope Hall, Hope Street, Liverpool, on Saturday, 25th January 1868, to Enquire into the Causes of the Prevailing Indifference of the Working Classes to Public Worship, Liverpool 1868, 6–9, 43–4.Google Scholar
page 206 note 8 Ryle, J. C., Can they be brought in?, London 1883, 44–5.Google Scholar
page 207 note 1 Hume, A., The Church of England the Home Missionary to the Poor, London 1862, passim.Google Scholar
page 207 note 2 J. G. Ryle, A Charge delivered to the Clergy. … 1887, 24.
page 207 note 3 Liverpool Diocesan Calendar for 1881, 94.
page 207 note 4 Official Report of the Liverpool Diocesan Conference, 2 and 3 November 1886, Liverpool 1886Google Scholar; J. G. Ryle, A Charge delivered to the Clergy.… 1896, 21.
page 207 note 5 Evidence of Rev.Tomlin, A. J., Parliamentary Papers, 1857–8, ix. 490.Google Scholar
page 207 note 6 Morley, J. C., A Brief Memoir of the Reverand Abraham Hume, Liverpool 1887.Google Scholar
page 208 note 1 Evidence of Rev.Baylee, J., Parliamentary Papers, 1857–8, ix. 422–7.Google Scholar
page 208 note 2 J. C. Ryle, A Charge delivered to the Clergy.… 1887, 9–11.
page 208 note 3 A. Hume, Misrepresentation of the Established Church, 9; Liverpool Daily Post, 20 October 1881, correspondence; compare K. S. Inglis, op. cit., 322, and R. Mudie-Smith, op. cit., 207–8.
page 208 note 4 Report of the Church Congress held at Liverpool in 1869, Liverpool 1869, 358, 392Google Scholar; Full Report of a Conference of Working Men. …., 66–7.
page 208 note 5 A. Hume, Misrepresentation of the Established Church, 17.
page 208 note 6 Liverpool Daily Post, 25 October 1881, correspondence.
page 208 note 7 Hume, A., Thoughts Unspoken at the Recent Conference of Sunday School Teachers in Hope Hall, London 1880, 18.Google Scholar
page 209 note 1 Full Report of a Conference of Working Men.…, 42–3, 52–4, 64–6.
page 209 note 2 Bishop Ryle in Liverpool Daily Post, 8 November 1881; bishop Chavasse in ibid., 12 November 1902; cf. R. Mudie-Smith, op. cit., 28–9.
page 209 note 3 Shimmin, H., Liverpool Life, Liverpool 1857Google Scholar, passim; Porcupine, 17 April 1880, 38.
page 209 note 4 Heiser, F. B., St. Aidan's College, Birkenhead, 1847–1947, Chester 1947, 14.Google Scholar
page 209 note 5 Winskill, P. T., The Temperance Movement and its Workers, London 1891, i. 69.Google Scholar
page 209 note 6 R. B. Rose, ‘John Finch, 1784–1857; a Liverpool Disciple of Robert Owen’, Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, Transactions, 109, 1957, 159–84.
page 210 note 1 Parliamentary Papers, 1845, xviii. 388.
page 210 note 2 Liverpool Daily Post, 12 November 1902.
page 210 note 3 See the Appendix for an explanation of census statistics.
page 210 note 4 K. S. Inglis, ‘Patterns of Religious Worship in 1851’, op. cit., 80–3.
page 211 note 1 See the Statistical Unit of the Central Board of Finance, Facts and Figures about the Church of England, London 1962, 53, 60.Google Scholar
page 211 note 2 C. F. G. Masterman in R. Mudie-Smith, op. cit., 207.
page 211 note 3 See Wickham, E. R., Church and People in an Industrial City, London 1962, 191–3.Google Scholar
page 211 note 4 Cf. Boulard, F., An Introduction to Religious Sociology, trans, by Jackson, M. J., London 1960, 5.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by