Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 April 2011
For the most part historians of the nineteenth century have tended to categorise the Whigs as the party of reform and the Tories as the party opposed to it. This trend has been strongest in the spheres of political and ecclesiastical history and has been supported by reference to events that led to the reforms of Church and State in the 1830s. The Whig commitment to ecclesiastical reform under Grey and Melbourne has established their reputation in the minds of historians as Church reformers without equal in the era.
1 Best, G. F. A., ‘The Whigs and the church establishment’, History xlv (1960).Google Scholar
2 BL, Add. MS 38279 fo. 323.
3 Ibid. 38281 fo. 5.
4 Ibid. 33112 fos 362 and 368.
5 Ibid. 38285 fo. 310; 38291 fo. 169; 38293 fo. 353. Cassan, S. H., The Lives of the Bishops of Winchester, Frome 1827, 281.Google Scholar
6 DNB, s.v.; Davies, G. C. B., Bishop Henry Phillpotts, London 1957Google Scholar, passim.
7 Baker, W.J., Beyond Port and Prejudice, Toronto 1982, 143.Google Scholar
8 BL, Add. MS 37304 fos 177–8.
9 Ibid., fos 181–5.
10 Ibid. 38279 fo. 323.
11 Gash, N., Lord Liverpool, London 1984, 202.Google Scholar
12 Southampton University Archives (hereinafter cited as SUA), Wellington Papers, WPI/916/10 and WPI/947/36. I am indebted to the staff of the University Archives for kindly allowing me access to the computer database of the Wellington Papers which is currently in preparation.
13 Ibid. WPI/968/27.
14 Ibid. WPI/943/21.
15 Ibid. WPI/1092/18.
16 Ibid. WPI/1126/13.
17 Blomfield, A., A Memoir of Charles Blomfield, London 1864, 63.Google Scholar
18 SUA, WPI/945/14.
19 BL, Add. MS 38574 fo. 176.
20 Ibid. 38286 fo. 306; 38285 fo. 39 and 32284 fo. 133.
21 Best, G. F. A., Temporal Pillars, Cambridge 1964, 261.Google Scholar
22 Gash, , Lord Liverpool, 202–3.Google Scholar
23 Kemm, W. St J., ‘The diocese of Bath and Wells 1790–1840’, MA diss., University of Birmingham 1965.Google ScholarCarpenter, S. C., Church and People 1789–1889, London 1933, 253.Google Scholar Bishop George Murray should not be confused with his namesake and father, the bishop of St Davids.
24 BL, Add. MS 38289 fo. 117.
25 Ibid. 38255 fo. 23.
26 Ibid. fos. 37–9.
27 Ibid. 38262 fos 198–9.
28 Ibid. 38286 fos 58, 59, 124, 133, 215, 278 and 367.
29 Ibid. 38298 fo. 182.
30 Ibid. 38302 fos 207–11.
31 Wade, J., The Black Book of 1831, London 1832, 36.Google Scholar
32 SUA, WPI/920/81 and WPI/971/I.
33 Ibid. WPI/1094/4.
34 Ibid. WPI/1093/20 and WPI/1111/5. William Van Mildert, later nicknamed ‘moneybags’, was famed for his wealth but was in severe financial difficulties before his advancement to the see of Durham.
35 BL, Add. MS 38286 fo. 284.
36 Harford, J. S., Thomas Burgess, London 1840, 358–9.Google Scholar
37 Rowden, A., The Primates of the Four Georges, London 1916, 388.Google Scholar
38 Varley, E. A., The Last of the Prince-bishops: William Van Mildert, Hull 1986, 22. SUA WPI/945/14 and WPI/945/23.Google Scholar
39 Gash, , Lord Liverpool, 202.Google Scholar
40 Aspinall, A. (ed.), The Letters of George IV, Cambridge 1938, ii. 58.Google Scholar
41 Coombs, J., George and Mary Sumner, London 1965, 17.Google Scholar
42 Aspinall, , op. cit. i. 295, 327–36.Google Scholar
43 Ibid. i. 294.
44 SUA, WPI/945/14a.
45 Ibid. WPI/945/14b.
46 Ibid. WPI/920/81.
47 Ibid. WPI/922/14, and Aspinall, , Letters of George IV, i. 294Google Scholar; Cowper, J. M., The Lives of the Deans of Canterbury, Canterbury 1900.Google Scholar
48 Aspinall, A., The Diary of H. Hobhouse, London 1947, 32.Google Scholar
49 Brown, F. K., The Fathers of the Victorians, Cambridge 1961, 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50 Wade, , Black Book, 230.Google Scholar