Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:33:57.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agricultural Seasonalily and the Organization of Manufacturing in Early Industrial Economies: The Contrast Between England and the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Kenneth L. Sokoloff  and
David Dollar
Kenneth L. Sokoloff
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research.
David Dollar
Affiliation:
Chief of the Macroeconomics and Growth Division, Policy Research Department, The World Bank, 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The greater flexibility associated with workers being able to choose the time and circumstance of their work allowed cottage manufacture to compete with technically more productive manufactories by rendering it more effective at harnessing a part time or offpeak workforce whose opportunity cost was low. Not only did this mean that cottage manufacture was better suited to the employment of women and children, who preferred flexibility in their hours and place of work, but also that the greater seasonality of labor supply in England led that economy to rely more on cottage manufacturing than did the United States during early industrialization.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 288 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, Robert C.Enclosure and the Yeoman. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, Allen C. “Agriculture During the Industrial Revolution.” In The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, Vol. 1, edited by Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, D. N., 96–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, and Bateman, Fred. “How Long Was the Workday in 1880?” this JOURNAL 52, no. 1(1992): 129–60.Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine. The Age of Manufactures. 1700–1820. 2d ed.London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Bidwell, Percy W., and Falconer, John I.. History of Agriculture in the Northern United States. 1620–1860. New York: Peter Smith, 1941.Google Scholar
Boyer, George R.An Economic History of the English Poor Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Bythell, Duncan. The Handloom Weavers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bythell, Duncan. The Sweated Trades. London: St. Martin’s, 1978.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. D. “The Rural Domestic Industries during the Period of Transition to the Factory System, with Special Reference to the Midland Counties of England”. In Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Economic History. Vol. 6. Aixen-Provence: Mouton & Co., 1962.Google Scholar
D, Chapman S.. “The Genesis of the British Hosiery Industry, 1600–1750.” Textile Industry 5, no: 1 (1972): 7–50.Google Scholar
Clark, Gregory. “Factory Discipline.” this JOURNAL 54, no. 1 (1994): 128–63.Google Scholar
Clark, Victor S.History of Manufactures in the United States. 3 vols. New YorkMcGraw- Hill, 1929.Google Scholar
Cole, Arthur H.The American Wool Manufacture. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Cole, Arthur H. “Economic History in the United States: Formative Years of a Discipline.” this JOURNAL 28, no. 4 (1968): 556–89.Google Scholar
C, Coleman D.. The Domestic System in Industry. London: Cox L Wyman, 1960.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. C.Industry in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Macmillan, 1975.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. C. “Proto-industrialization: A Concept Too Many.” Economic History Review 36, no. 3 (1985): 435–48.Google Scholar
Collins, E. J. T. “Harvest Technology and Labour Supply in Britain, 1790–1870.” Economic History Review 22, no. 1 (1969): 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, E. J. T. “Migrant Labour in British Agriculture in the Nineteenth Century.” Economic History Review 29, no. 1 (1976): 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Court, W. H. B. The Rise of the Midland Industries. 1600–1838. London: Oxford University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R. British Economic Growth During the Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Dublin, Thomas. Transforming Women’s Work. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley L. “Family and Economy: Some Comparative Perspectives.” In The European Peasant, Family, and Society: Historical Studies, edited by Rudolph, Richard I., 233–48. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley, and Goldin, Claudia. “Seasonality in Nineteenth-Century Labor Markets.” In American Economic Development in Historical Perspective, edited by Weiss, Thomas and Schaefer, Donald, 99–126. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Felkin, William. A History of Machine- Wrought Hosiery and Lace Manufactures. Cambridge: W. Metcalfe, 1867.Google Scholar
Field, Alexander J. “On the Unimportance of Machinery.” Explorations in Economic History 22, no. 4 (1985): 378–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, Robert W. “The Specification Problem in Economic History.” this JOURNAL 27, no. 3 (1967): 283–308.Google Scholar
Free, Benjamin J.Seasonal Employment in Agriculture, Works Progress Administration. Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1938.Google Scholar
Gallman, Robert E. “American Economic Growth Before the Civil War: The Testimony of the Capital Stock Estimates.” In American Economic Growth and Standards of Living Before the Civil War, edited by Gallman, Robert E. and John, Joseph Wallis, 79–120. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Gardners’ Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette. London, various dates.Google Scholar
Gates, Paul W.The Farmer’s Age: Agriculture, 1815–1860. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1960.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia and Sokoloff, Kenneth. “Women, Children, and Industrialization in the Early Republic: Evidence from the Manufacturing Censuses.” this JOURNAL 42, no. 4 (1982): 741–74.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia and Kenneth, Sokoloff “The Relative Productivity Hypothesis of Industrialization: The American Case, 1820 to 1850.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99, no. 3 (1984): 461–87.Google Scholar
Gullickson, Gay L. “Agriculture and Cottage Industry: Redefining the Causes of Protoindustrialization.” this JOURNAL 43, no. 4 (1983): 831–850.Google Scholar
Habakkuk, H. J.American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century: The Search for Labour-Saving Inventions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Knick, Harley C.. “Ocean Freight Rates and Productivity, 1740–1913: The Primacy of Mechanical Invention Reaffirmed.” this JOURNAL 48, no. 4 (1988): 851–76.Google Scholar
Hartwell, Robert. “Markets, Technology, and the Structure of Enterprise in the Development of the Eleventh-Century Chinese hon and Steel Industry.” this JOURNAL 26, no. 1 (1966): 29–58.Google Scholar
Hazard, Blanche E.The Organization of the Boot and Shoe Industry in Massachusetts Before 1875. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1921.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Susan E.Roots of the American Working Class: The Industrialization of Crafts in Newark, 1800–1860. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hood, Adrienne D. “Organization and the Extent of Textile Manufacture in Eighteenth Century Rural Pennsylvania: A Case Study of Chester County.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, San Diego, 1989.Google Scholar
Hunt’s Merchants’ Magazine 41, no. 12 (1859). New York.Google Scholar
James, John. 1857. History of the Worsted Manufacture in England. London: Cass, 1968.Google Scholar
James, John A., and Skinner, Jonathan S.. “The Resolution of the Labor-Scarcity Paradox.” this JOURNAL 45, no. 3 (1985): 513–40.Google Scholar
John, A. H. “Statistical Appendix.” In The Agrarian History of England and Wales. Vol. 6. 1750–1850, edited by Mingay, G. E., 972–1155Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Jones, Eric L. “Agricultural Origins of Industry.” Past and Present 40 (1968): 58–71.Google Scholar
Kain, Roger J. P.An Atlas and Index of the Tithe Files of Mid-Nineteenth Century England and Wales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Zorina, Khan B., and Sokoloff, Kenneth L.. “‘Schemes of Practical Utility’: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Among ‘Great Inventors’ in the United States, 1790–1865.” this JOURNAL 53, no. 2 (1993): 289–307.Google Scholar
Kussmaul, Ann. A General View of the Rural Economy of England, 1538–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kuznets, SimonSeasonal Variations in Industry and Trade. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1933.Google Scholar
Landes, David S.The Unbound Prometheus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Landes, David S. “What Do Bosses Really Do?” this JOURNAL 46, no. 3 (1986): 585–623.Google Scholar
Lloyd, , Godfrey, I. H.The Cutlery Trades: An Historical Essay in the Economics of Small- Scale Production. London: Cass, 1968.Google Scholar
McMahon, Sarah F. “A Comfortable Subsistence: The Changing Composition of Diet in Rural New England, 1620−184.” William and Mary Quarterly 42, no. 1 (1985): 28–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marglin, Stephen A. “What Do Bosses Do? The Origins and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production, Part I.” Review of Radical Political Economics 6, no. 1 (1974): 60–112.Google Scholar
Mellor, John W.The Economics of Agricultural Development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mendels, Franklin F. “Protoindustrialization: The First Phase of the Industrialization Process.” this JOURNAL 32, no. 2 (1972): 241–61.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. “The Industrial Revolution in the Low Countries in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century: A Comparative Case Study.” this JOURNAL 34, no. 2 (1974): 365–91.Google Scholar
Mokyr, JoelIndustrialization in the Low Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Ormrod, David. English Grain Exports and the Structure of Agrarian Capitalism. 1700–1760. Hull: Hull University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Pinchbeck, Ivy. Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution. 1750–1850. London: Routledge, 1930.Google Scholar
Plummer, Alfred, The Witney Blanket Industry. London: Routledge, 1934.Google Scholar
Postel-Vinay, Gilles. “The Dis-integration of Traditional Labour Markets in France: From Agriculture and Industry to Agriculture or Industry.” In Labour Market Evolution: The Economic History of Market Integration, Wage Flexibility, and the Employment Relation, edited by Grantham, George and MacKinnon, Mary, 64–83. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Winifred B. “The Productivity Consequences of Market Integration: Agriculture in Massachusetts, 1771–1801.” In American Economic Growth and Standards of Living Before the Civil War, edited by Gallman, Robert E. and John, Joseph Wallis, 311–45. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Winifred, Rothenberg B. “Structural Change in the Farm Labor Force: Contract Labor in Massachusetts Agriculture, 1765–1865.” In Strategic Factors in Nineteenth Century American Economic History: A Volume to Honor Robert W Fogel, edited by Goldin, Claudia and Rockoff, Hugh, 105–34. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Schob, David. Hired Hands and Plowboys: Farm Labor in the Midwest. 1815–60. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Simler, Lucy. “The Landless Worker: An Index of Economic and Social Change in Chester County, Pennsylvania, 1750–1820. Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 114, no. 2 (1990): 163–99.Google Scholar
Smith, Thomas C. “Farm Family By-Employments in Preindustrial Japan.” In Native Sources of Japanese Industrialization. 1750–1920, edited by Smith, Thomas C., 71–102. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Snell, R. D. M. “Agricultural Seasonal Unemployment, the Standard of Living, and Women’s Work in the South and East, 1690–1860.” Economic History Review 34, 2nd series, no. 3 (1981): 407–37.Google Scholar
Snell, R. D. M.Annals of the Labouring Poor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L. “Industrialization and the Growth of the Manufacturing Sector in the Northeast, 1820–1850.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 1982.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L. “Investment in Fixed and Working Capital During Early Industrialization: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing Firms.” this JOURNAL 44, no. 2 (1984): 545–56.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L. “Was the Transition from the Artisanal Shop to the Nonmechanized Factory Associated With Gains in Efficiency?: Evidence from the U.S. Manufacturing Censuses.” Explorations in Economic History 21, no. 4 (1984): 351–82.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L. “Productivity Growth in Manufacturing During Early Industrialization: Evidence from the American Northeast, 1820–1860.” In Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, edited by Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E., 679–736. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L. “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence from Patent Records, 1790–1846.” this JOURNAL 48, no. 4 (1988): 813–50.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L. “Invention, Innovation, and Manufacturing Productivity Growth in the Antebellum Northeast.” In American Economic Growth and Standards of Living Before the Civil War, edited by Gallman, Robert E. and John, Joseph Wallis, 345–84. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L., and Zorina, Khan B.. “The Democratization of Invention During Early Industrialization: Evidence from the United States, 1790–1846.” this JOURNAL 50, no. 2, (1990): 363–78.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L., and Tchakerian, Viken. “Manufacturing Where Agriculture Predominates: Evidence from the South and Midwest in 1860.” Explorations in Economic History, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Tchakerian, Viken. “Productivity, Extent of Markets, and Manufacturing in the Late Antebellum South and Midwest.” this JOURNAL 54, no. 3 (1994): 497–525.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter. “Labor Scarcity and the Problem of American Industrial Efficiency in the 1850s.” this JOURNAL 26, no. 3 (1966): 277–98.Google Scholar
Thirsk, Joan. “Industries in the Countryside.” In Essays in the Economic and Social History of Tudor and Stuart England, edited by Fisher, F. J., 70–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Tryon, Rolla Milton. 1917. Household Manufactures in the United States, 1640–1860. New York: Augustus Kelley, 1966.Google Scholar
Unwin, George. Industrial Organization in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1904.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. 1844. 1841 Census Great Britain. Population: Occupation Abstract. In British Parliamentary Papers, Vol. 5. Shannon: Irish University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. House of Commons. “Returns Relating to the Acreage of Land Under Crops, Bare Fallow and Grass in the United Kingdom in the Year 1866.” Sessional Papers, 1866, Vol. 60.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Historical Statistics of the United States. Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives. Documents Relative to the Manufactures in the United States. 2 vols. Washington: Duff Green, 1833.Google Scholar
Vickers, Daniel. Farmers & Fishermen: Two Centuries of Work in Essex County, Massachusetts. 1630–1850. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Wells, F. A.The British Hosiery and Knitwear Industry: Its History and Organisation. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1972.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. “The Organization of Work: A Comparative Institutional Assessment.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1, no. 1 (1980): 5–38.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. “Urban Growth and Agricultural Change: England and the Continent in the Early Modern Period. In People, Cities and Wealth, edited by Wrigley, E. A., 157–93. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar