Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:29:32.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Capital and Knowledge-Intensive Industries Location: Evidence from Soviet Legacy in Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

Denis Ivanov
Denis Ivanov*
Affiliation:
Denis Ivanov is Research Fellow, International Center for the Study of Institutions and Development, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 20 Myasnitskaya str., Moscow 101000 Russian Federation. E-mail: dsivanov@hse.ru.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do human capital endowments trump location for knowledge-intensive industries? This article takes advantage of a natural experiment created by the end of the Soviet planned economy in 1991, which had geographically distributed R&D manpower according to planned needs as opposed to a distribution determined by a market economy. It examines the extent to which the planned economy created a path-dependence in the location of post-Soviet human-capital intensive production. The study finds that regions with more R&D personnel in 1991 did better in the development of modern market-oriented knowledge-intensive business services, like engineering and IT. Several explanations are offered for this path-dependence, with an emphasis on human capital externalities being the most plausible.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 736 - 768
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and supported within the framework of a subsidy granted to the HSE by the Government of the Russian Federation for the implementation of the Global Competitiveness Program.

Alexei Faddeev, Victoria Golikova and Tatiana Mikhailova kindly provided necessary data for the article. I am grateful to Kristian Behrens, Tatiana Dolgopyatova, Vladimir Gimpelson, Philip Keefer, Boris Kuznetsov, John V.C. Nye, Alexey Oshchepkov, Koen Schoors, Alex Teytelboym, Ilya Voskoboynikov, Andrei Yakovlev, and Natalia Zubarevich for their helpful comments. The article was significantly improved by the suggestions of Ann M. Carlos and three anonymous referees. An early version of this paper was presented at the research seminars at the HSE, as well as at 54th European Regional Science Association Congress and 3rd International conference “Industrial Organization and Spatial Economics” under the title “Transition and Path-Dependence in Knowledge-Intensive Industry Location: Case of the Russian Professional Services.”

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, and Angrist, Joshua. “How Large Are Human-Capital Externalities? Evidence from Compulsory-Schooling Laws.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, Volume 15, pp. 9–74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Acs, Zoltan J., and Armington, Catherine. “The Impact of Geographic Differences in Human Capital on Service Firm Formation Rates.” Journal of Urban Economics 56, no. 2 2004: 244–78.Google Scholar
Andersson, Roland, Quigley, John M., and Wilhelmson, Mats. “University Decentralization as Regional Policy: The Swedish Experiment.” Journal of Economic Geography 4, no. 4 2004: 371–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belousova, Yu.V., Gorodnikova, N. V., Gokhberg, L.M., et al. Indikatory nauki: 2013. Staisticheskiy sbornik. (Indicators of Science: 2013. Statistical Yearbook). Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2013.Google Scholar
Bennett, Robert J., Graham, Daniel J., and Bratton, William. “The Location and Concentration of Businesses in Britain: Business Clusters, Business Services, Market Coverage and Local Economic Development.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 24, no. 4 1999: 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleakley, Hoyt, and Lin, Jeffrey. “Portage and Path Dependence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127, no. 2 2012: 587–644.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, Michael. “The Geography of Russia's New Political Economy.” New Political Economy 13, no. 2 2008: 193–201.Google Scholar
Brakman, Steven, Garretsen, Harry, and Schramm, Marc. “The Strategic Bombing of German Cities during World War II and Its Impact on City Growth.” Journal of Economic Geography 4, no. 2 2004: 201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantoni, Davide, and Yuchtman, Noam. “Medieval Universities, Legal Institutions, and the Commercial Revolution.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 129, no. 2 2014: 823–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N.F.R, and Wolf, Nikolaus. “The Location of the British Cotton Textiles Industry in 1838: A Quantitative Analysis.” Journal of Economic History 74, no. 4 2014: 1103–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Donald R., and Weinstein, David. “Bones, Bombs, and Break Points: The Geography of Economic Activity.” American Economic Review 92, no. 5 2002: 1269–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Donald R., and Weinstein, David. “A Search for Multiple Equilibria in Urban Industrial Structure.” Journal of Regional Science 48, no. 1 2008: 29–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falck, Oliver, Fritsch, Michael, and Heblich, Stephan. “Is Industry Location Persistent over Time? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns between New and Incumbent Firms in Germany.” Review of Regional Research 34, no. 1 2014: 1–21.Google Scholar
Francois, Joseph F. “Producer Services, Scale, and the Division of Labor.” Oxford Economic Papers 72, no. 4 1990: 715–29.Google Scholar
Freeman, Chris. “The ‘National System of Innovation' in Historical Perspective.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 19, no. 1 1995: 5–24.Google Scholar
Fu, Shihe. “Smart Café Cities: Testing Human Capital Externalities in the Boston Metropolitan Area.” Journal of Urban Economics 61, no. 1 2007: 86–111.Google Scholar
Fujita, Masahisa, and Thisse, Jacques-François. “Economics of Agglomeration.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 10, no. 4 1996: 339–78.Google Scholar
Fujita, Masahisa, Krugman, Paul R., and Venables, Anthony. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Gang, Ira N., and Stuart, Robert C.. “Mobility Where Mobility Is Illegal: Internal Migration and City Growth in the Soviet Union.” Journal of Population Economics 12, no. 1 1999: 117–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guriev, Sergei, and Vakulenko, Elena. “Breaking Out of Poverty Traps: Internal Migration and Interregional Convergence in Russia.” Journal of Comparative Economics 43, no. 3 2015: 633–49.Google Scholar
Hausman, Naomi. “University Innovation, Local Economic Growth, and Entrepreneurship.” U.S. Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper No. CES-WP-12–10, 2012.Google Scholar
Hill, Fiona, and Gaddy, Clifford G.. The Siberian Curse: How Communist Planners Left Russia Out in the Cold. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Howells, Jeremy R. L. “Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography.” Urban Studies 39, no. 5–6 2002: 871–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabbour, Liza. “Market Thickness, Sunk Costs, Productivity, and the Outsourcing Decision: An Empirical Analysis of Manufacturing Firms in France.” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 46, no. 1 2013: 103–34.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Adam B., Trajtenberg, Manuel, and Henderson, Rebecca. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, no. 3 1993: 577–98.Google Scholar
Keeble, David, and Nachum, Lilach. “Why Do Business Service Firms Cluster? Small Consultancies, Clustering and Decentralization in London and Southern England.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27, no. 1 2002: 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolko, Jed. “Urbanization, Agglomeration, and Coagglomeration of Service Industries.” In Agglomeration Economics, pp. 151–80. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.” Journal of Political Economy 99, no. 3 1991: 483–99.Google Scholar
Kryshtanovskaya, Olga. Anatomiya rossiyskoy elity (The Anatomy of Russian Elite). Moscow: Zakharov, 2005.Google Scholar
Kumo, Kazuhiro. “Soviet Industrial Location: A ReExamination.” Europe-Asia Studies 56, no. 4 2004: 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22, no. 1 1988: 3–42.Google Scholar
Markevich, Andrei, and Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina. “M-Form Hierarchy with Poorly-Diversified Divisions: A Case of Khrushchev's Reform in Soviet Russia.” Journal of Public Economics 95, no. 11 2011: 1550–60.Google Scholar
Meliciani, Valentina, and Savona, Maria. “The Determinants of Regional Specialisation in Business Services: Agglomeration Economies, Vertical Linkages and Innovation.” Journal of Economic Geography 2014: lbt038.Google Scholar
Mikhailova, Tatiana N. “Essays on Russian Economic Geography: Measuring Spatial Inefficiency.” PhD diss., Pennsylvania State University, 2004.Google Scholar
Meliciani, Valentina, and Savona, Maria. Gulag, WWII and the Long-run Patterns of Soviet City Growth. University Library of Munich, Germany, 2012.Google Scholar
Miguel, Edward, and Roland, Gerard. “The Long-Run Impact of Bombing Vietnam.” Journal of Development Economics 96, no. 1 2011: 1–15.Google Scholar
Moretti, Enrico. “Estimating the Social Return to Higher Education: Evidence from Longitudinal and Repeated Cross-Sectional Data.” Journal of Econometrics 121, no. 1 2004: 175–212.Google Scholar
Muller, Emmanuel, and Doloreux, David. “What We Should Know About Knowledge-Intensive Business Services.” Technology in Society 31, no. 1 2009: 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ono, Yukako. “Market Thickness and Outsourcing Services.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 37, no. 2 2007: 220–38.Google Scholar
Osipov, Yuri. Akademiya nauk v istorii Rossiyskogo gosudarstva (Academy of Sciences in the History of the Russian State). Moscow: Nauka, 1999.Google Scholar
Radosevic, Slavo. “Patterns of Preservation, Restructuring and Survival: Science and Technology Policy in Russia in Post-Soviet Era.” Research Policy 32, no. 6 2003: 1105–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, James E. “Productivity Gains from Geographic Concentration of Human Capital: Evidence from the Cities.” Journal of Urban Economics 34, no. 3 1993: 380–400.Google Scholar
Redding, Stephen J., and Sturm, Daniel M.. “The Costs of Remoteness: Evidence from German Division and Reunification.” American Economic Review 98, no. 5 2008: 1766–97.Google Scholar
Redding, Stephen J., Sturm, Daniel M., and Wolf, Nikolaus. “History and Industry Location: Evidence from German Airports.” Review of Economics and Statistics 93, no. 3 2011: 814–31.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Allan. “The Locational Dynamics of Soviet Industry.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 64, no. 2 1974: 226–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearmur, Richard, and Doloreux, David. “Urban Hierarchy or Local Buzz? High-Order Producer Service and (or) Knowledge-Intensive Business Service Location in Canada, 1991–2001.” Professional Geographer 60, no. 3 2008: 333–55.Google Scholar
Shepotylo, Oleksandr. “Cities in Transition.” Comparative Economic Studies 54, no. 3 2012: 661–88.Google Scholar
Squicciarini, Mara, and Voigtlaender, Nico. “Human Capital and Industrialization: Evidence from the Age of Enlightenment.” NBER Working Paper No. 20219, Cambridge, MA, 2014.Google Scholar
Vek Lavrent'eva (Lavrentyev's Age). Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo SO RAN, Filial V26 “Geo,” 2000.Google Scholar
Venables, Anthony J. “Productivity in Cities: Self-Selection and Sorting.” Journal of Economic Geography 11, no 2 2011: 241–51.Google Scholar
Yurevich, Andrei V. Umnye, no bednye: uchyonye v sovremennoy rossii (Smart but Poor: Scientists in Contemporary Russia). Moscow: Moskovskiy Obschestvennyy Nauchnyy Fond, 1998.Google Scholar