Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:43:58.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Industrial Revolution in Miniature: The Spinning Jenny in Britain, France, and India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

Robert C. Allen
Robert C. Allen*
Affiliation:
Professor of Economic History, Department of Economics, Oxford University, Nuffield College, New Road, Oxford OX1 1NF, United Kingdom. E-mail: bob.allen@nuffield.ox.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The spinning jenny helps explain why the Industrial Revolution occurred in Britain rather than in France or India. Wages were exceptionally high relative to capital prices in Britain, so the jenny was profitable to use in Britain but not elsewhere. Since it was only profitable to use the jenny in Britain, that was the only country where it as worth incurring the costs of developing it. Irrespective of the quality of their institutions or the progressiveness of their cultures, neither the French nor the Indians would have found it profitable to mechanize cotton production in the eighteenth century.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 69 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 901 - 927
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron.“Directed Technical Change.” Review of Economic Studies 69 no. 4 (2002) 781–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron.“Factor Prices and Technical Change: From Induced Innovations to Recent Debates.” In Knowledge, Information, and Expectations in Modern Macroeconomics: In Honor of Edmund Phelps. edited by Philippe, Aghion et al., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2003.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron.“Equilibrium Bias of Technology.” Econometrica 75 no. 5 (2007) 1371–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, DaronSimon, Johnson and James, Robinson“The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change, and Economic Growth.” American Economic Review 95 no. 3 (2005) 546–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Robert C.“Collective Invention.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 4 no. 1 (1983) 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Robert C.“The Great Divergence in European Wages and Prices from the Middle Ages to the First World War.” Explorations in Economic History 38 no. 4 (2001) 411–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Robert C.“India in the Great Divergence.” In The New Comparative Economic History: Essays in Honor of Jeffery G. Williamson, edited by Timothy, J. HattonKevin, H. O'Rourke and Alan, M. Taylor9–32Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2007a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Robert C.“Engel's Pause: A Pessimist's Guide to the British Industrial Revolution.” Working Paper No. 315, Oxford University, Department of Economics, 2007b.Google Scholar
Allen, Robert C.“The Industrial Revolution in Miniature: The Spinning Jenny in Britain, France, and India.” Working Paper No. 375, Oxford University, Department of Economics, 2007c.Google Scholar
Allen, Robert C.The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, T. S.An Economic History of England: The Eighteenth Century. London: Methuen 1955.Google Scholar
Aspin, C. and Chapman, S. D.James Hargreaves and the Spinning Jenny. Preston: Helmshore Local History Society 1964Google Scholar
Aström, Sven-Erik“Swedish Iron and the English Iron Industry About 1700: Some Neglected Aspects.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 30 no. 2 (1982) 129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Anthony B. and Joseph, E. Stiglitz“A New View of Technological Change.” Economic Journal 79 no. 315 (1969) 573–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, Edward.History of the Cotton Manufacture in Great Britain. London: H. Fisher, R. Fisher, and P. Jackson 1835.Google Scholar
Batchelor, T.General View of the Agriculture of the County of Bedfordshire. London: R. Phillips 1808.Google Scholar
Bentley, Thomas.Letters on the Utility and Policy of Employing Machines to Shorten Labour. London: T. Becket 1780.Google Scholar
Beveridge, Lord.Prices and Wages in England from the Twelfth to the Nineteenth Century. London: Frank Cass & Co., Ltd., 1965 [1939]. Reprint.Google Scholar
Bhalla, A. S.“Investment Allocation and Technological Choice: A Case of Cotton Spinning Techniques.” Economic Journal 74 no. 295 (1964) 611–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen and Bishnupriya, Gupta“The Early Modern Great Divergence: Wages, Prices, and Economic Development in Europe and Asia, 1500-1800.” Economic History Review 59, no. 1(2006a): 2–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen and Bishnupriya, Gupta“Wages, Induced Innovation, and the Great Divergence: Lancashire, India, and Shifting Competitive Advantage in Cotton Textiles, 1700-1850.” Revised version of CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5183, 2006b.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert.Some Considerations Touching the Usefulness of Experimental Natural Philosophy. Oxford: Hendry Hall, printer to the University 1671.Google Scholar
Chapman, S. D. and John, Butt“The Cotton Industry, 1775-1856.” In Studies in Capital Formation in the United Kingdom, 1750-1920, edited by Charles, H. Feinstein and Sidney, Pollard105–25Oxford: Clarendon Press 1988.Google Scholar
Chassagne, Serge.Le coton et ses patrons: France, 1780-1840. Paris: Édition de d'École des hautes études en sciences socials 1991.Google Scholar
Chaudhury, Sushil.From Prosperity to Decline: Eighteenth-Century Bengal. New Delhi: Manohar Publishers & Distributors, 1999.Google Scholar
Clark, Greg.“The Political Foundations of Modern Economic Growth: England, 1540-1800.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 26 no. 4 (1996) 563–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Greg.A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R.“Industrial Revolution in England and France: Some Thoughts on the Question: ‘Why was England First?'” Economic History Review 30 no. 3 (1977) 429–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R. and Harley, C. K.“Simulating the Two Views of the Industrial Revolution.” This JOURNAL 60 no. 3 (2000) 819–41.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R. and Venables, A. J.“Globalization in History: A Geographical Perspective.” In Globalization in Historical Perspective, edited by Michael, BordoAlan, M. Taylor and Jeffrey, G. Williamson323–64Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouzet, FrançoisDe la superiorité de l'Angleterre sur la France. Paris: Librairie Académique Perrin 1985Google Scholar
David, Paul.Technical Choice, Innovation, and Economic Growth: Essay on American and British Experience in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1975Google Scholar
De Long, J. Bradford and Andrei, Schleifer“Princes and Merchants: European City Growth Before the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of Law and Economics 36 no. 2 (1993) 671–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divekar, V. D.Prices and Wages in Pune Region, 1805-1830. Pune: Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics 1989.Google Scholar
Doyon, AndréJacques Vaucanson: Mécanicien de genie. Paris: Presses Universitaires 1966Google Scholar
Dyer, John.The Fleece: A Poem. London: R. & J. Dodsley 1757.Google Scholar
Eden, Sir Frederick MortonThe State of the Poor. London: J. Davis 1797.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. R.Freedom and Growth: The Rise of States and Markets in Europe, 1300-1750. London: Routledge 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremdling, Rainer.“Transfer Patterns of British Technology to the Continent: The Case of the Iron Industry.” European Review of Economic History 4 no. 2 (2000) 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremdling, Rainer.“Continental Responses to British Innovations in the Iron Industry During the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries.” In Exceptionalism and Industrialisation: Britain and Its European Rivals, 1688-1815, edited by Leandro, Prados de la Escosura145–69Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayer, A. D.Rostow, W. W. and Schwartz, A. J.. The Growth and Fluctuation of the British Economy, 1790-1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1953Google Scholar
Gilboy, Elizabeth W.Wages in Eighteenth-Century England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1934Google Scholar
Griffith, TrevorPhilip, A. Hunt and Patrick, K. O'Brien“Inventive Activity in the British Textile Industry, 1700-1800.” This JOURNAL 52 no. 3 (1992) 881–906.Google Scholar
Habakkuk, H. J.American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1962Google Scholar
Hahn, F. H., and Matthews, F. C. O.. “The Theory of Economic Growth: A Survey.” The Economic Journal 74 no. 296 (1964) 779–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, A.Études économiques sur l'Alsace, ancienne et modern. Strasbourg: Hagemann Librairie 1878.Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick.“The Shift from Sailing Ships to Steam Ships, 1850-1890: A Study in Technological Change and Its Diffusion.” In Essays on a Mature Economy: Britain After 1840, edited by D. N., McCloskey215–34Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1971.Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick.“Cotton Textiles and the Industrial Revolution: Competing Models and Evidence of Prices and Profits.” Unpublished Manuscript, 2006.Google Scholar
Harris, J. R.“Saint-Gobain and Ravenhead.” In Great Britain and Her World, 1750-1914: Essay in Honour of W. O. Henderson, edited by Barrie, M. Ratcliffe27–70Manchester: Manchester University Press 1975.Google Scholar
Hartwell, R. M.The Causes of the Industrial Revolution. London: Methuen & Co. 1967.Google Scholar
Henson, Gravenor.The Civil, Political, and Mechanical History of the Framework-Knitters in Europe and America, edited by Stanley, D. Chapman Newton Abbot: David & Charles, 1970 [1831]. Reprint.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R.The Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan 1932.Google Scholar
Hills, Richard L.Power in the Industrial Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press 1970Google Scholar
Hills, Richard L.Power from Steam: A History of the Stationary Steam Engine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Philip T. and Kathryn, NorbergFiscal Crises, Liberty, and Representative Government, 1450-1789. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Philip T., Gilles, Postel-Vinay and Rosenthal, Jean-LaurentPriceless Markets: The Political Economy of Credit in Paris, 1660-1870. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2000Google Scholar
Homer, Sidney.A History of Interest Rates. Second edition. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press 1977Google Scholar
Hoppit, Julian.“Patterns of Parliamentary Legislation, 1660-1800.” The Historical Journal 39 no. 1 (1996) 109–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppit, J.Innes, J. and Styles, J.“Towards a History of Parliamentary Legislation, 1660-1800.” Parliamentary History 13, Pt. 3 (1994): 312–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Charles K.Technological Change and the British Iron Industry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1977Google Scholar
Inikori, Joseph E.Africans and the Industrial Revolution in England: A Study in International Trade and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, Joanne.“Politics, Property, and the Middle Class.” Parliamentary History XI, Pt. 2 (1992): 286–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, Joanne.“The Local Acts of a National Parliament: Parliament's Role in Sanctioning Local Action in Eighteenth Century Britain.” In Parliament and Locality, edited by Dean, D. and Jones, C.23–47Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 1998.Google Scholar
Jacob, Margaret C.The Cultural Meaning of the Scientific Revolution. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press 1988.Google Scholar
Jacob, Margaret C.Scientific Culture and the Making of the Industrial West. New York: Oxford University Press 1997Google Scholar
Kerridge, Eric.Textile Manufactures in Early Modern England. Manchester: Manchester University Press 1985Google Scholar
Khan, Zorina.The Democratization of Invention: Patents and Copyrights in American Economic Development: 1790-1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005Google Scholar
Khan, Zorina and Ken, Sokoloff“Of Patents and Prizes: Great Inventors and the Evolution of Useful Knowledge in Britain and America, 1750-1930.” Presented to the American Economic Association, 2006.Google Scholar
Landes, David S.The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1969Google Scholar
LaPorta, R.Lopez-de-Silanes, F.Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W.“Law and Finance.” Journal of Political Economy 106 no. 6 (1998) 1113–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Christine.Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The English Patent System, 1660-1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marglin, Stephen.“What Do Bosses Do?” In The Division of Labour: The Labour Process and the Class Struggle in Modern Capitalism, edited by André, Gorz13–54Brighton: The Harvester Press 1976.Google Scholar
Mathias, P. and O'Brien, P. K.“Taxation in England and France, 1715-1810.” Journal of European Economic History 5 no. 3 (1976) 601–50.Google Scholar
Mathias, P. and O'Brien, P. K.“The Incidence of Taxes and the Burden of Proof.” Journal of European Economic History 7 no. 1 (1978) 211–13.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel ed. “Editor's Introduction: The New Economic History and the Industrial Revolution.” In The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective 1–127 Boulder, CO: Westview Press 1999Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel ed. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2002Google Scholar
Morris, Morris D.“The Growth of Large-Scale Industry to 1947.” In The Cambridge Economic History of India, Volume 2: c. 1757-c. 1970, edited by Dharma, Kumar553–676Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983.Google Scholar
Muldrew, Craig.“The ‘Ancient Distaff and Whirling Spindle:’ Measuring the Contribution of Spinning to Household Earnings and the National Economy in England, 1550-1770.” Paper presented at the Economic History Society Conference, Exeter, 2007.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph.Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. I, Introductory Orientations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1954Google Scholar
North, D. C. and Weingast, B. R.“Constitutions and Commitment: Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” This JOURNAL 49 no. 4 (1989) 803–32.Google Scholar
Pinchbeck, Ivy.Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 1750-1850. London: George Routledge & Sons, Ltd. 1930.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, K.The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2000Google Scholar
Quinn, Stephen.“The Glorious Revolution's Effect on English Private Finance: A Microhistory, 1680-1705.” This JOURNAL 61 no. 3 (2001) 593–615.Google Scholar
Raychaudhuri, Tapan.“Mughal India.” In The Cambridge Economic History of India, Vol. I: c. 1200-c. 1750, edited by Tapan, Raychaudhuri and Irfan, Habib261–307Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J. E. T.A History of Agriculture and Prices in England. 7 volumes. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1866-1892.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, J.-L.“The Development of Irrigation in Provence.” This JOURNAL 50 no. 3 (1990) 615–38.Google Scholar
Ruttan, Vernon W.Technology, Growth, and Development: An Induced Innovation Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2001Google Scholar
Ruttan, Vernon W. and Colin, G. ThirtleThe Role of Supply and Demand in the Generation and Diffusion of Technical Change. New York: Harwood Academic Publications 1987.Google Scholar
Salter, W. E. G.Productivity and Technical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1960Google Scholar
Sen, A.Choice of Techniques: An Aspect of the Theory of Planned Economic Development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1968.Google Scholar
Smith, A.An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, edited by Cannan, E.New York: The Modern Library 1937 [1776]. Reprint.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter.“Notes on Labor Scarcity in America.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 1 no. 2 (1971) 251–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temin, Peter.“Two Views of the British Industrial Revolution.” This JOURNAL 57 no. 1 (1997) 63–82.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter.“A Response to Harley and Crafts.” This JOURNAL 60 no. 3 (2000) 842–46.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, Alfred P. and Julia de, Lacy MannThe Cotton Trade and Industrial Lancashire, 1600-1780. Manchester: Manchester University Press 1931Google Scholar
Young, Arthur.A Six Month's Tour Through the North of England. London: W. Strahan 1770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Arthur.Travels in France During the Years 1787, 1788, & 1789, edited by Constantia, Maxwell Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950.Google Scholar