Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:36:01.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monetary Aspects of the Treasury Notes of the War of 1812

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Donald H. Kagin
Donald H. Kagin
Affiliation:
president of Kagin's Numismatic Investment Corporation, 4 Embarcadero, San Francisco, California 94111.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Between 1812 and 1815, the United States authorized five Treasury note issues. In total, over $36 million in denominations of $3 to $1000 were emitted. The last issue included small circulating notes in denominations of less than $100. Because of the shortage of adequate circulating medium and revenue to conduct the War of 1812, these notes proved to be extremely useful as they were transferable by delivery and receivable for duties, taxes, and public use at par plus accrued interest. They also served as interest-bearing reserves for banks since they were convertible into any kind of money and bore interest simultaneously. The success of the Treasury notes was demonstrated by the fact that they were fully subscribed and accepted by the banks and merchants. In addition, the small Treasury note issues of 1815 indirectly served to increase the circulating medium of the country. They were used to buy goods and services by individuals, pay custom duties by merchants, and acted as cash reserves for banks, preventing bank notes from being discounted. They thus became the first circulating paper currency issued by the United States after ratification of the Constitution.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 69 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Laws of the United Stares Concerning Money, Banking, Loans, 1778–1909, National Monetary Commission, compiled by Huntington, Andrew T. and Mawhinney, Robert J., Doc. No. 480, Senate 61st Congress, 2nd Session (Washington, D.C., 1910). PP. 29–43.Google Scholar

2 Gallatin, Albert, “Report of the Finances 1807,” Reports of the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, Vol. 1 (Washington, D.C., 1837). p. 359Google Scholar, and Dallas, A. J., “Report of the Finances 1815,” Reports, 2:45.Google Scholar

3 Foreign coins officially circulated from 1793 until 1797, when a new law declared that only “Spanish milled dollars and parts thereof” were legal tender. This statute remained in effect until 1857.Google Scholar

4 Balinky, Alexander, Albert Gallatin, Fiscal Theories and Policies (New Brunswick, 1958), pp. 180–88Google Scholar and Gallatin, Albert, “Report of the Finances 1809,” Reports, p. 401.Google Scholar Also see “Report of the Finances 1811,” Reports, p. 449.Google Scholar

5 Idem., “Report of the Secretary of the Treasury, 1811,” Reports, p. 449. Also in the Niles Weekly Register, 11 22, 1811 (Washington, D.C.), 2:232.Google Scholar In a letter to the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Ezekiel Bacon, Gallatin blames the poor state of the finance on the failure of Congress to recharter the Bank of the United States, upon which he had relied heavily for the U.S. government to obtain loans, and also for the Legislature's refusal to double the tariff. Gallatin, Albert, “Letter to Ezekiel Bacon, January 10, 1812,” The Writings of Albert Gallatin, ed. Adams, Henry, Vol. I (New York, 1960), pp. 338–40.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., p. 448.

7 Gallatin, Albert, The Writings of Albert Gallatin, ed. Adams, Henry, 4 Vols. (Philadelphia, 1879), Vol. III, p. 5.Google Scholar

8 Bacon, Ezekiel, “Ways and Means Report of House, February 17, 1812,” American State Papers, Finance, U.S. Congress, ed. Lowrie, Walter, Vol. II (Washington, D.C., 1832), p. 539.Google Scholar

9 Bayley, Rafael A., National Loans of the United States from July 14, 1776 to June 30, 1880 (Washington, D.C., 1882), p. 48Google Scholar, and Adams, Henry Carter, Public Debts: An Essay in the Science of Finance (New York; Privately printed, 1887), pp. 117–18.Google Scholar

10 Gallatin, Albert, “Letter to John W. Eppes, February 25, 1810,” Writings, II:467–468.Google Scholar

11 Idem., “Letter to Ezekiel Bacon, January 10, 1812,” Writing, II: 501. Also in Letter from the Chairman of the Committee of Ways and Means to the Secretary of the Treasury with the Answer of the Secretary of the Treasury (Alexandria, 1812), p. 14. Rare Book Room, National Archives, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

12 “Letter to Langdon Cheves, May 14, 1812,” cited by Knox, John J., United States Notes (New York, 1848), p. 22.Google Scholar

13 The Niles Weekly Register, June 15, 1812, 2:279.Google Scholar

14 Annals of the Congress of the United States 12th Congress, 1st Session, vol. I (Washington, D.C., 1853) p. 1495–1510.Google Scholar

15 Ibid. Also The Niles Weekly Register, June 13, 1812 3:300.

16 Ibid., pp. 1509–10.

17 Bayley, National Loans, pp. 48–49. Other major elements provided that 1) the notes were signed by persons designated by the President who were paid $1.25 for every note signed, 2) they were countersigned by the Comptroller of Loans for the state for which the notes were made payable, 3) the Secretary of the Treasury was authorized to borrow upon the security of the notes and pay them to the banks which would receive them at par, 4) interest ceased on the day of payment, and 5) strict penalties were imposed for counterfeiting.Google Scholar

18 Niles Weekly Register, 3:350. Also see Richmond inquirer, February 16, 1814, 2:2.Google Scholar The Treasury Reports, however, state that only $2.8 million were subscribed to by 1813. Dewey, Davis R., Financial History of the United States (New York, 1968), p. 137.Google Scholar

19 “Register of Treasury Notes,” Vol. 189, Record Group 53, National Archives (Washington, D.C.). Breen erroneously claims March 1813 as the final date of redemption.Google Scholar

20 Gallatin, Albert, “State of Finance, December 1812,” Finance, 11:580.Google Scholar

21 Niles Weekly Register (July 4, 1812), 3:300.Google Scholar It should be noted that, as Walter Breen pointed Out, the Register had a bias toward Wall Street. Breen, Walter, “Promises, Promises,” Numismatic News Weekly, 01 1, 1974.Google Scholar

22 Dallas, A. J., “Letter to William Lowndes, November 27, 1814,” Reports, 1:244.Google Scholar

23 Ibid.

24 Niles Weekly Register (July 4, 1812), 3:300.Google Scholar

25 Timberlake, Richard H., Origins of Central Banking in the United States (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1978).Google Scholar Drawing upon statistical information compiled from Van Fenstermaker, J., A Statistical Summary of the Commercial Banks Incorporated in the United States Prior to 1819 (Kent, Ohio, 1965), Timberlake concluded that “as banks increased their holdings of treasury notes, their own note issues could increase by multiples of the treasury notes obtained. Bank notes were thus used as hand-to-hand currency, and the treasury notes were used mainly as bank reserves in lieu of specie.”Google Scholar

26 “Receipts and Expenditures, from March 4, 1789 to December 15, 1815,” Finance, II:920.Google Scholar

27 Madison, James, “Fourth Annual Message, November 4, 1812.” Compilation of Messages and Papers of the President's 1789–1897, Vol. I.Google Scholar

28 Bayley, National Loans, p. 50.Google Scholar

29 Gallatin, Writings, p. 196.Google Scholar

30 Jones, William, “State of Finance, June 1813,” Finances, II: 1622–23.Google Scholar

31 Bayley, National Loans, p. 50.Google Scholar

32 Gallatin, Albert, “Report of the Secretary of the Treasury December 1812,” Reports, p.469.Google Scholar

33 Bayley, National Loans, p. 50.Google Scholar

34 DeKnight, W. F., History of the Currency of the Country and the Loans of the United States (Washington, D.C., 1897), p. 47.Google Scholar

35 Messages and Papers of the Presidents, pp. 528–30. The direct tax amounted to $3 million and was assessed in 1814. For a useful table on these taxes, see Dewey, Financial History, p. 140.Google Scholar

36 Gallatin, Writings, p. 201.Google Scholar

37 Estimated expenditures at $43,350,000 and revenue at $16,000,000. Jones, Willliam, “State of Finance”, Finance, 2:651.Google Scholar

38 Bayley, National Loans, p. 52.Google Scholar

39 The Richmond Inquirer (May 7, 1814), 3:2, reported that by May 7, $10 million at 88 percent had been subscribed. In his report on Finances in December 1814, Dallas mentioned that proposals were invited on August 22, 1814 for $6 million at 6 percent; of this only $2,823,300 was subscribed; $100,000 at less than 80 percent; $2,213,000 at 80 percent; $510,300 at 80–88 percent. All but the $100,000 were accepted because there was no prospect of better terms and the money was indispensable. $410,000 of these contracts were reneged on by the banks. Special contracts for loans with the banks were unsuccessful. “Report on Finances December 1814,” Reports, p. 528.Google Scholar

40 Jones, William, “Report of Finance, December, 1813,” Reports, p. 502. There is no corroborating evidence that an annual issuance of $5,000,000 was ever authorized.Google Scholar

41 Bayley, National Loans, p. 52.Google Scholar

42 “Estimates and Statements by the Registrar of the Treasury,” Vol. 145. General Records from the Central Treasury Records, Records of the Bureau of the Public Debt, Record Group 53, p. 24.Google Scholar

43 Eppes, John W., “Letter to Secretary of the Treasury Dallas, October 14, 1814,” Reports, p. 234.Google Scholar

44 Dallas, A. J., “Letter to John Eppes, 10 17, 1814,” Reports, pp. 234–36.Google Scholar

45 Ibid., p. 236 and p. 266; also in Niles Weekly Register (December. 24, 1814).

46 Niles Weekly Register (December. 24, 1814).Google Scholar

47 Idem., “Report of the Secretary of the Treasury, November, 1815,” Reports, 11:13.

48 Bayley, National Leans, p. 56.Google Scholar

49 Ibid., p. 57.

50 Gallatin, Albert, “Letter to Monroe, October 26, 1814,” Writings, 1:642.Google Scholar

51 “Report by John W. Eppes, October 10, 1814,” in Knox, John Jay, United States Notes (New York, 1884), p. 32.Google Scholar

52 Niles Weekly Register (December. 2, 1814), 8:266.Google Scholar

53 Dallas, A. J., “Report on the Finances, December, 1814,” Reports, p. 529.Google Scholar

54 Annals, 13:3 (November. 12. 1814), p. 557.Google Scholar

55 Ibid., p. 559.

56 Annals, 13:3 (January. 7, 1815), p. 1045. Also in the Richmond Inquirer (January. 11, 1815), 2:3.Google Scholar

57 Annals, 13:3 (December. 13, 1814), p. 884.Google Scholar

58 Dallas, A. J., Official Letter, Appendices to Report on Finances October, 1814, Reports, pp. 268–69.Google Scholar

59 Annals, 13:3 pp. 1111, 1124, 1133, 1146, 1148, 1177, 258.Google Scholar

60 Dallas, A. J., “Letter to John Eppes, February 20, 1815,” Reports, pp. 273–75.Google Scholar

61 Crawford, William H., “Report of the Treasurer,” Reports, p. 125.Google Scholar The first known transaction in small Treasury notes was $150,000 ordered by Smith, Johanthan, Cashier of the Bank of Pennsylvania on 06 28, 1815. “Domestic Letters 1814–1816,” Vol. I, Record Group 53, Archives (Washington, D.C.), p. 108.Google Scholar

62 Knox, United States Notes, p. 37.Google Scholar

63 Dallas, A. J., “Report on the Finances, December, 1815,” Reports, pp. 24–25.Google Scholar

64 Madison, James, “Veto Message, January 30, 1815,” Compilation, Vol. I, p. 556.Google Scholar

65 Richmond, Examiner (12. 31, 1814), 3:2 & 3.Google Scholar

66 Report in the Niles Weekly Register, 7:3361.Google Scholar

67 Breen, in Numismatic News Weekly, January 15, 1974, p. 34; and Knox, United Slates Notes, p. 38. Knox makes the additional statement that “after deducting discounts and depreciation,” the notes were rapidly funded alter December 1814.Google Scholar

68 Report in the Niles Weekly Register (May 20, 1815), 8:203.Google Scholar

69 Ibid., p. 214.

70 Ibid., p. 215.

71 Richmond, Examiner (06 7, 1815), 3:4.Google Scholar

72 WashingtonNational Intelligencer (08 15, 1815), 1:3.Google Scholar

73 Niles Weekly Register (December. 4, 1815), 3:2.Google Scholar

74 Ibid.

75 Ibid. (August. 26, 1815), p. 439.

76 Report in the National Intelligencer (January. 5, 1815), 3:2.Google Scholar

77 Dallas, A. J., “Report on the Finances, 12, 1815,” Reports, p. 26.Google Scholar

78 Ibid., p. 52.

79 Ibid. p. 75.

80 Breen, in Numismatic News Weekly (January 15, 1974), p. 34.Google Scholar