Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:48:55.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nationalizations and the Development of Transport Systems: Cross-Country Evidence from Railroad Networks, 1860–1912

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

Dan Bogart*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of California, Irvine, 3151 Social Science Plaza, Irvine, CA 92697–5100. E-mail: dbogart@uci.edu.

Abstract

Many states nationalized portions of their railroad network between 1860 and 1912. This article uses new cross-country data to examine which factors contributed to nationalizations and how nationalizations influenced network expansion. I find evidence that nationalizations were greater in countries with low constraints on the executive branch, with French and German civil law systems, and where neighboring countries had higher military capability. I also find evidence that nationalizations reduced mileage growth. The results suggest that external military threats increased the appeal of nationalizations, while legal and political institutions influenced their costs. They also suggest that nationalizations reduced investment incentives.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, and Robinson, James. “Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-term Growth.” In Handbook of Economic Growth, edited by Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Stephen, pp. 385472. New York: North Holland, 2005.Google Scholar
Ames, Edward. “A Century of Railroad Construction: 1837–1936.” American Slavic and East European Review 6, no. 3/4 (1947): 5774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Skog, Lena, and Krantz, Olle, eds. Institutions in the Transport and Communications Industries. Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 1999.Google Scholar
Argentina, Ministerio de Obras Publicas. Estadistica de los Ferrocarriles en Explotacio. Buenos Aires: Talleres Graficos Del Ministerio de Obras Publicas, 1916.Google Scholar
Braun-Llona, Juan, Braun-Llona, Matȷas, Briones, Ignacio, Dȷaz, Josȳ; Lɒders, Rolf, and Wagner, Gert. “Economȷa Chilena 1810–1995: Estadȷsticas HistɃricas.” PUC Economics Institute Working Paper No. 187, 1998.Google Scholar
Brazil, Industrias, Viacao e Obras Publicas. Sao Paulo: Brazil, annual series, 1893–1909.Google Scholar
Brazil, Viaco e Obrass Publicas. Sao Paulo: Brazil, annual series, 1909–1914.Google Scholar
Chile, Oficina Central de Estadistica, . Annuario Estadistico de la Republica de Chile. Santiago: Soc. Imprenta Y Litografia Universo, 1912.Google Scholar
Della Paolera, Gerardo, and Taylor, Alan M.. A New Economic History of Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Duncan, Julian Smith. Public and Private Operation of Railways in Brazil. New York: AMS Press, 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewsnup, Ernest. “The Attitude of the State Towards Railways: A Discussion of the Question of Nationalization.” American Economic Review 1, no. 2 (1911): 175–87.Google Scholar
Doukas, K.French Railroads and the State. New York: Columbia Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Ericson, Steven J.The Sound of the Whistle: Railroads and the State in Meiji Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles, and Pollard, Sidney, eds. Studies in Capital Formation in the United Kingdom, 1750–1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert. American Railroads and the Transformation of the Antebellum Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert. Railroads and American Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Fremdling, Rainer. “Freight Rates and State Budget: the Role of the National Prussian Railways, 1880–1913.” Journal of European Economic History 9, no. 1 (1980): 2139.Google Scholar
Fremdling, Rainer. “The Prussian and Dutch Railway Regulations in the Nineteenth Century.” In Institutions in the Transport and Communications Industries, edited by Anderson-Skog, Lena and Krantz, Olle, pp. 6192. Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 1999.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Global Financial Data, . https://www.globalfinancialdata.com/ (accessed September 2007).Google Scholar
Great Britain, Board of Trade, . Railways: Foreign Countries and British Possessions, London: HM Stationary, 1907.Google Scholar
Great Britain, Board of Trade, . Report on State Railways: British Possessions and Foreign Countries, London: HM Stationary, 1913.Google Scholar
Great Britain, Board of Trade, . Statistical Abstract for British India. London: HM Stationary, annual series.Google Scholar
Great Britain, Board of Trade, . Statistical Abstract for the Principal and other Foreign Countries in each Year. London: HM Stationary, annual series.Google Scholar
Great Britain, Board of Trade, . Statistical Abstract for the Several Colonial and other Possessions of the United Kingdom. London: HM Stationary, annual series.Google Scholar
Gregory, Paul. Russian National Income, 1885–1913. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert, Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. The Polity IV Project. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland, 2002. http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/ (accessed September 2007).Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick. “Oligopoly Agreement and the Timing of American Railroad Construction.” This Journal 42, no. 4 (1982): 797823.Google Scholar
Henisz, W. J.The Institutional Environment for Infrastructure Investment.” Industrial and Corporate Change 11, no. 2 (2002): 355–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huenemann, Ralph W.The Dragon and the Iron Horse: The Economics of Railroads in China, 1876–1937. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Italy, Direzione generale delle ferrovie dello Stato, . Sviluppo delle ferrovie italiane dal 1839 al 31 dicembre 1926. Rome: Tipografia ditta L. Cecchini, 1927.Google Scholar
Keefer, Philip. “Protection Against a Capricious State: French Investment and Spanish Railroads, 1845–1875.” This Journal 56, no. 1 (1996): 170–92.Google Scholar
Koc, Sumru Altug, Filiztekin, Alpay, and Pamuk, Sevket. “Sources of Long-term Economic Growth for Turkey, 1880–2005.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 6463, 2006.Google Scholar
Lahmeyer, Jan. Populstat. http://www.library.uu.nl/wesp/populstat/populhome (accessed September 2007).Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei. “Government Ownership of Banks.” Journal of Finance 57, no. 1 (2002): 265301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei. “The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.” NBER Working Paper No. 13608, Cambridge, MA, 2007.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Pop-Eleches, Cristian, and Shleifer, Andrei. “Judicial Checks and Balances.” Journal of Political Economy 112, no. 2 (2004): 445–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Brian, and Spiller, Pablo. Regulations, Institutions, and Commitment: Comparative Studies of Telecommunications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leunig, Tim. “Time is Money: A Re-Assessment of the Passenger Social Savings from Victorian British Railways.” This journal 66, no. 3 (2006): 635–73.Google Scholar
Lewis, Colin. British Railways in Argentina, 1857–1914: A Case Study in Foreign Investment. London: Athlone Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Maddison, Angus. The world economy: historical statistics. Paris: Development Centre, OECD, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, Paul G.The Common Law and Economic Growth: Hayek Might be Right.” The Journal of Legal Studies 30, no. 2 (2001): 503–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeely, John H.The Railways of Mexico: A study in Nationalization.” Southwestern Studies 2, no. 1 (1964): 156.Google Scholar
Micheli, Horace. “State Purchase of Railways in Switzerland.” Economic Studies 3, no. 6 (1898): 356420.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. R.International Historical Statistics: Europe, 1750–1988. New York: MacMillan, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. R.International Historical Statistics: Africa, Asia, and Oceania, 1750–1988. New York: MacMillan, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. R.International Historical Statistics: The Americas, 1750–2000. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003.Google Scholar
Millward, Robert. “European Governments and the Infrastructure Industries, c.1840– 1914.” European Review of Economic History 8, no. 1 (2004): 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millward, Robert. Private and Public Enterprise in Europe: Energy, Telecommunications, and Transport, 1830–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton, 1981.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Patrick, ed. Railways and the Economic Development of Western Europe, 1830–1914. London: MacMillan, St. Anthony's College Oxford, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkees, Meredith Reid. “The Correlates of War Data on War: An Update to 1997.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 18, no. 1 (2000): 123–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schampel, James H.Change in Material Capabilities and the Onset of War: A Dyadic Approach.” International Studies Quarterly 37, no. 4 (1993): 395408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schram, Albert. Railways and the Formation of the Italian State in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Schulz, Max-Stephan. “Patterns of Growth and Stagnation in the Late Nineteenth-Century Hapsburg Economy.” European Review of Economic History 4, no. 2 (2000): pp. 311–40.Google Scholar
Sherman, Charles Phineas. Roman Law in the Modern World. New Haven, CT: New Haven Law Book Company, 1922.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David. “Reconstructing the Correlates of War Dataset on Material Capabilities of States, 1816–1985.” International Interactions 14, no. 2 (1987): 115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David, Bremer, Stuart, and Stuckey, John. “Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965.” In Peace, War, and Numbers, edited by Russett, Bruce, 1948. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1972.Google Scholar
Stinnett, Douglas M., Tir, Jaroslav, Schafer, Philip, Diehl, Paul F., and Gochman, Charles. “The Correlates of War Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3.” Conflict Mangagement and Peace Science 19, no. 1 (2002): 5866.Google Scholar
Summerhill, William. “Big Social savings in a Small Laggard Economy: Railroad-Led Growth in Brazil.” This Journal 65, no. 1 (2005): 72102.Google Scholar
Thorner, David. “The Pattern of Railway Development in India.” Far Eastern Quarterly 14, no. 2 (1955): 201–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, Charles. Coercion, Capital, and European States: A. D. 990–1992. New York: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar
Veenendaal, Augustus J.State versus Private Enterprise in Railway Building in the Netherlands, 1838–1938.” Business and Economic History 24, no. 1 (1995): 186–93.Google Scholar
Wallsten, Scott. “Returning to Victorian Competition, Ownership, and Regulation: an Empirical Study of European Telecommunications at the Turn of the Twentieth CenturyThis Journal 65, no. 3 (2005): 693722.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Yousef, Tarik. “Egypt's Growth Performance under Economic Liberalism: A Reassessment with New GDP estimates, 1886–1945.” Review of Income and Wealth 48, no. 4 (2002): 561–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar