Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:25:59.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The American Workingman and the Antislavery Crusade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Joseph G. Rayback
Affiliation:
Quonset Point, R. I.

Extract

In his autobiography, Cheerful Yesterdays, Thomas Wentworth Higginson, looking back on the long crusade that ended with the abolition of Negro bondage in the United States, declared: “The anti-slavery movement was not strongest in the educated classes, but was primarily a people's movement, based on the simplest human instincts and far stronger … in the factories and shoe-shops than in the pulpits and colleges.” Few people have challenged this statement, which Higginson made in 1898; probably because the scarcity of material on the subject has prevented a thorough examination of all its implications, and especially of the main argument that the laboring man was the real force behind the antislavery crusade.Yet there is sufficient evidence to throw serious doubt upon the accuracy of Higginson's statement, evidence which reveals that workers in shops and factories often exhibited an almost callous unconcern for the entire crusade.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Higginson, Thomas W., Cheerful Yesterdays (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1898), 115.Google Scholar

2 Hine, Lucius A., quoted in the National Era, August 21, 1851.Google Scholar

3 The Liberator, January 1, 1831.

4 Ibid., January 8, 1831.

5 Ibid., January 29, 1831; see also ibid., March 19, 1847; also Commons, John R., et al. (eds.), A Documentary History of American Industrial Society (Cleveland: The A. H. Clark Company, 19101911), VII, 351352.Google Scholar

6 Working Men's Advocate, November 21, 1835.

7 Young America, quoted in National Era, March 2, 1848. See also Young America, January 23, 1847, quoted in ibid., March 11, 1847.

8 The pamphlet ran through at least three printings.

9 James, H. F., Abolitionism Unveiled (New York, 1850). 2.Google Scholar

10 Ibid., 27.

11 Workingman's Advocate, June 22, July 6, 1844.

12 New York Weekly Tribune, June 20, 1845. For similar expressions of this and the previous statement made by George Henry Evans see also Liberator, September 4, 1846; Young America, quoted in National Era, March 11, 1847, March 2, 1848; Du Bois, W. E. Burghardt, Black Reconstruction (New York: Harcourt Brace and Company, 1935), 21Google Scholar; Schlueter, Hermann, Lincoln, Labor, and Slavery (New York: Socialist Literature Company, 1913), 60, 62, 64, 67Google Scholar; Commons, , “Horace Greeley and the Working Class Origins of the Republican Party,” Political Science Quarterly, XXIV 1909), 479Google Scholar; Frothingham, Octavius, Gerrit Smith (New York, 1878), 346347.Google Scholar

13 Quoted in Schlueter, Lincoln, Labor, and Slavery, 72–73; Du Bois, Black Reconstruction, 23.

14 Ibid., 22.

15 Schlueter, Lincoln, Labor, and Slavery, 39.

16 Working Men's Advocate, November 21, 1835.

17 Liberator, September 4, 1846.

18 George E. McNeill (ed.), The Labor Movement: The Problem of Today (Boston, 1887), 107.

19 Du Bois, Black Reconstruction, 23.

20 See Schlueter, Lincoln, Labor, and Slavery, 77.

21 Liberator, September S, 1845; see also ibid., June 6, 1845.

22 Phalanx, November 4, 1843, quoted in Commons, Documentary History, VII, 207208.Google Scholar

23 Young America, January 23, 1847, quoted in National Era, February 11, 1847.

24 Salem Ohio Homestead Journal, quoted in Liberator, April 21, 1848. See also Young America, quoted in National Era, February 11, 1847; Liberator, July 4, 1845; Commons, “Working Class Origins of the Republican Party,” Political Science Quarterly, XXIV, 479; New York Weekly Tribune, October 15, 1845; Commons, Documentary History, VIII, 23–24; Congressional Globe, 31st Cong., 2d Sess., 980; 36th Cong., 1st Sess., 1632.

25 Young America,, quoted in National Era. March 2, 1848.

26 See New York Weekly Tribunc, October 7, 1848; Buffalo Republic, October 3, 1848.

27 Cincinnati Daily Unionist, February 1, 1854.

28 Ibid., March 1, 1854; see also National Era, March 9, 1854.

29 New York Weekly Tribune, October 26, 1850.

30 See Schlueter, Lincoln, Labor, and Slavery, 82.

31 Cole, Arthur C., Lincoln's “House Divided” Speech (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1923), 30.Google ScholarSee also Carlton, Frank T., Organized Labor in American History (New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1920), 147.Google Scholar

32 Ibid., 148.

33 See the New York Weekly Tribune, August 24, 1860.

34 See ibid., October 15, 1845; June 19, 1846; June 23, 1847; July 1, 1848; June 19, 1850; June 11, 1851; June 3, 1852; June 2, 1853; June 9, 1854; June 8, 1855; June 7, 1856.

35 Du Bois, Black Reconstruction, 25–26.