Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T12:20:55.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crossover Inventions and Knowledge Diffusion of General Purpose Technologies: Evidence from the Electrical Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

Shih-tse Lo  and
Dhanoos Sutthiphisal
Shih-tse Lo*
Affiliation:
Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West, H 1155, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1M8. E-mail: shihtlo@alcor.concordia.ca.
Dhanoos Sutthiphisal*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, McGill University, 855 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2T7 Canada; and NBER. E-mail: dhanoos.sutthiphisal@mcgill.ca.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholars have long noted the significant impact of general purpose technologies (GPTs) on the economy. However, limited attention has been paid to exploring how they are employed to generate inventions in downstream sectors (crossover inventions), and what factors may facilitate such diffusion. In a study of the introduction of electrical technology in the late-nineteenth-century United States, we find that knowledge spillovers between industries had little influence on the geography of crossover inventions as well as the speed and productivity of crossover inventors. Instead, human capital and an environment promoting inventions in general were more important.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 744 - 764
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, James D., and Jaffe, Adam B.. “Bounding the Effects of R&D: An Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data.” RAND Journal of Economics 27, no. 4 (1996): 700–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, Bateman, Fred, and Margo, Robert. “Steam Power, Establishment Size, and Labor Productivity Growth in Nineteenth-Century American Manufacturing.” Explorations in Economic History 45, no. 2 (2008): 185–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnahan, Timothy F., and Trajtenberg, Manuel. “General Purpose Technologies: Engines of Growth?” Journal of Econometrics 65 (1995): 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittain, James E., “The International Diffusion of Electrical Power Technology, 1870–1920.” The Journal of Economic History 34, no. 1 (1974): 108–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, David R.“Partial Likelihood” Biometrika 62, no. 2 (1975): 269–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, Nicholas. “Steam as a General Purpose Technology: A Growth Accounting Perspective.” Economic Journal 114 (2004): 338–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Paul A.“The Dynamo and the Computer: A Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 80, no. 2 (1992): 355–61.Google Scholar
Devine, Warren D. Jr., “From Shafts to Wires: Historical Perspective on Electrification.” The Journal of Economic History 43, no. 2 (1983): 347–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, Claudia, and Katz, Lawrence F.. “The Origins of Technology-Skill Complementarity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, no. 3 (1998): 693–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Jerry, Hall, Bronwyn H., and Griliches, Zvi. “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship.” Econometrica 52, no. 4 (1984): 909–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan, and Trajtenberg, Manuel. “A Time to Sow and a Time to Reap: Growth Based on General Purpose Technologies.” In General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, edited by Helpman, Elhanan, 55–83. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan, and Trajtenberg, Manuel. “Diffusion of General Purpose Technologies.” In General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, edited by Helpman, Elhanan, 85–118. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hughes, Thomas P.Networks of Power. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A., and Klenow, Peter J.. “Learning-by-Doing Spillovers in the Semiconductor Industry.” Journal of Political Economy 102, no. 6 (1994): 1200–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Adam B., and Trajtenberg, Manuel. “International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 8 (1999): 105–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, Boyan, and Rousseau, Peter L.. “General Purpose Technologies.” In Handbook of Economic Growth, Volume 1B, edited by Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven N., 1181–1224. Amsterdam: North Holland, 2005.Google Scholar
Khan, B. Zorina. The Democratization of Invention: Patents and Copyrights in American Economic Development, 1790–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Nicholas M.“Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions.” Journal of Economic Literature 26, no. 2 (1988): 646–79.Google Scholar
Kim, Sukkoo. “Industrialization and Urbanization: Did the Steam Engine Contribute to the Growth of Cities in the United States?” Explorations in Economic History 42, no. 4 (2005): 586–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., and Sokoloff, Kenneth L.. “Inventors, Firms, and the Market for Technology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.” In Learning by Firms, Organizations, and Countries, edited by Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter, 19–60. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
LexisNexis. “U.S. Patents.” Available at www.lexisnexis.com (accessed March 2006–October 2007).Google Scholar
Lipsey, Richard G., Carlaw, Kenneth I., and Bekar, Clifford T.. Economic Transformations: General Purpose Technologies and Long-Term Economic Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Malerba, Franco. “Learning by Firms and Incremental Technical Change.” Economic Journal 102, no. 413 (1992): 845–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Petra, and Nicholas, Tom. “Was Electricity a General Purpose Technology? Evidence from Historical Patent Citations.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 94, no.2 (2004): 388–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
My Family.com, Inc. Available at www.ancestry.com (accessed April 2006–November 2007).Google Scholar
Passer, Harold C.The Electrical Manufacturers, 1875–1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. Inside the Black Box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan, and Trajtenberg, Manuel. “General-Purpose Technology at Work: The Corliss Steam Engine in the Late-Ninteenth-Century United States.” The Journal of Economic History 64, no. 1 (2004): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxenian, AnnaLee. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Sutthiphisal, Dhanoos. “Learning-by-Producing and the Geographic Links Between Invention and Production: Experience from the Second Industrial Revolution.” The Journal of Economic History 66, no. 4 (2006): 992–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Manufactures. Washington, DC: GPO, various years.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Population. Washington, DC: GPO, various years.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. “Census Regions and Divisions of the United States.” Available at http://www.census.gov/geo/www/us_regdiv.pdf (accessed January 31, 2010).Google Scholar
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. “Full-Page Images.” Available at www.uspto.gov (accessed March 2006–October 2007).Google Scholar