Article contents
The Decline of the British Economy: An Institutional Perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2009
Abstract
This paper attributes the relative decline of the British economy in the twentieth century to rigidities in its economic and social institutions that had developed during the nineteenth-century era of relatively atomistic competition. Inherited and persistent constraints impeded British firms from acquiring the market control, authority in labor relations, or managerial hierarchy necessary to avail themselves fully of modern mass production methods. At the societal level there was an interrelated failure to transform the character of British educational and financial institutions, labor-management relations, and state policy in order to promote economic development. By performing better in these respects lateindustrializing countries were able to surpass Britain in economic growth.
- Type
- Papers Presented at the Forty-Third Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Economic History Association 1984
References
1 See, for example, Allen, G. C., The British Disease (London, 1976).Google Scholar
2 McCloskey, Donald N., ed., Essays on a Mature Economy: Britain After 1840 (London, 1971);Google ScholarMcCloskey, Donald N. and Sandberg, Lars, “From Damnation to Redemption: Judgments on the Late Victorian Entrepreneur,” Explorations in Economic History, 9 (Fall 1971), 89–108;Google Scholar R. C. Floud, “Britain 1860–1914: A Survey,” and Sandberg, L. G., “The Entrepreneur and Technological Change,” both in The Economic History of Britain since 1700, ed. Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, Donald, vol. 2 (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar
3 See, for example, Caves, Richard E., “Productivity Differences among Industries,” in Britain's Economic Performance, ed. Caves, Richard E. and Krause, Lawrence B. (Washington, D.C., 1980).Google Scholar
4 Landes, David, The Unbound Prometheus (Cambridge, 1969), chap. 5;Google ScholarWiener, Martin, English Culture and The Decline of the Industrial Spirit, 1850–1980 (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar
5 Best, Michael and Humphries, Jane, “The City and the Decline of British Industry,” in The Decline of the British Economy, ed. Elbaum, Bernard and Lazonick, William (Oxford, forthcoming).Google Scholar
6 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, The Visible Hand (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1977);Google ScholarChandler, Alfred D. Jr, and Daems, Herman, eds., Managerial Hierarchies (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1980).Google Scholar
7 Hannah, Leslie, The Rise of the Corporate Economy: The British Experience (Baltimore, 1976);Google ScholarChandler, Alfred D. Jr, “The Growth of the Transnational Industrial Firm in the United States and the United Kingdom: A Comparative Analysis,” Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 33 (08 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Lazoniek, William, “Industrial Organization and Technological Change: The Decline of the British Cotton Industry,” Business History Review, 57 (Summer 1983), 195–236.Google Scholar
9 Wrigley, Julia, “Seeds of Decline: Technical Education and Industry in Britain,” in The Decline of the British Economy.Google Scholar
10 Mowery, David, “British and American Industrial Research: A Comparison, 1900–1950,” in The Decline of the British Economy.Google Scholar
11 Lorenz, Edward and Wilkinson, Frank, “Shipbuilding and British Economic Decline, 1880–1965”; Bernard Elbaum, “British Steel Industry Structure and Performance before World War I”; William Lazonick, “The Decline of the British Cotton Industry”; Stephen Tolliday, “Industry, Finance, and the State: Steel and Rationalization Policy”; all in The Decline of the British Economy.Google Scholar
12 Lorenz and Wilkinson, “Shipbuilding and British Economic Decline,” and Lazonick, “The Decline of the British Cotton Industry.”Google Scholar
13 Reader, William, Imperial Chemical Industries: A History, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1972);Google ScholarWilson, Charles, The History of Unilever: A Study of Economic Growth and Social Change, 2 vols. (London, 1954),Google Scholar and Unilever 1945–1965: Challenge and Response in the Post-War Industrial Revolution (London, 1965).Google Scholar
14 Lewchuk, Wayne, “The British Motor Vehicle Industry: The Roots of Decline,” in The Decline of the British Economy.Google Scholar
15 Matthews, R. C. O., Feinstein, C. H., and Odling-Smee, J. C., British Economic Growth, 1856–1973 (Stanford, 1982), p. 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Lazonick, William and Mass, William, “The Performance of the British Cotton Industry, 1870–1913,” Research in Economic History, 9 (Spring 1984).Google Scholar
17 Elbaum, “British Steel Industry Structure and Performance.”Google Scholar
18 Aldcroft, Derek H. and Richardson, H. W., The British Economy, 1870–1939 (London, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 von Tunzelmann, G. N., “Structural Change and Leading Sectors in British Manufacturing, 1907–1968,” in Economics in the Long View, ed. Kindleberger, Charles P. and di Tella, Guido (New York, 1982), vol. 3, pp. 28–30.Google Scholar
20 Feinstein, Charles, ed., The Managed Economy (Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar
21 Hall, Peter, “The State and Economic Decline in Britain,” in The Decline of the British Economy.Google Scholar
22 Best and Humphries, “The City and the Decline of British Industry”; Lazonick, “The Decline of the British Cotton Industry”; Tolliday, “Industry, Finance, and the State.”Google Scholar
23 Tolliday, “Industry, Finance, and the State.”Google Scholar
24 Mowery, “British and American Industrial Research.”Google Scholar
25 Heim, Carol, “Regional Development and National Decline: The Evolution of Regional Policy in Interwar Britain,” in The Decline of the British Economy.Google Scholar
- 39
- Cited by