Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:45:58.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Democratic Opposition to the Fair Labor Standards Act: A Comment on Fleck

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2004

ANDREW J. SELTZER
Affiliation:
Reader in Economics, Royal Holloway College, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 OEX, United Kingdom. E-mail: a.seltzer@rhul.ac.uk.

Extract

In a well-crafted recent article in this JOURNAL, Robert Fleck argues that voting on the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the last and among the most contentious pieces of major New Deal legislation, was heavily influenced by regional political differences and by the “southern political system.” This contention is broadly supportive of a view held by several traditional historians, who have argued that political differences between the North and South were a major factor in voting. According to this view, the considerable support for minimum wages among southern workers, African American leaders, and the general public did not translate into congressional votes for the FLSA due to southern political institutions that effectively disfranchised many of the voters who were predisposed to support the FLSA. In a previous article I argued that, although southern representatives were more likely to vote against the FLSA, this was primarily because of economic differences between the two regions, not political factors. I argued that the opposition to the FLSA was spearheaded by low-wage employers, who were disproportionately concentrated in the South. This note examines the reasons for these conflicting results. It is argued that Fleck's approach to prediction, which evaluates the marginal impact of his independent variables individually, but does not jointly consider the variables that defined the southern political system, is misleading, and a more appropriate approach using his own regression results supports my contention that political differences between North and South were inconsequential to the overall roll-call vote on the FLSA. It is shown that, holding economic factors constant, had the South been politically like the North, the estimated roll-call vote on the FLSA would have been very similar to the actual votes in 1937 and 1938.

Type
NOTES AND DISCUSSION
Copyright
© 2004 The Economic History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown Charles, Curtis Gilroy, and Andrew Kohen. (1982)The Effect of the Minimum Wage on Employment and Unemployment.” Journal of Economic Literature 20, no. 2 487528.Google Scholar
Card David, and Alan B. Krueger. 1995 Myth and Measurement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Fleck Robert K. (2002)Democratic Opposition to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.” This JOURNAL 62, no. 1 2554.Google Scholar
Maddala G. S. 1983 Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press
Neumark David and William Wascher. (2000)Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Comment.” American Economic Review 90, no. 4 136297.Google Scholar
Patterson James T. 1967 Congressional Conservatism and the New Deal. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press
Poole Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997 Congress: A Political Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press
Schulman Bruce J. 1991 From Cotton Belt to Sunbelt. New York: Oxford University Press
Seltzer Andrew J. (1995)The Political Economy of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.” Journal of Political Economy 103, no. 6 130244.Google Scholar