Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:49:47.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Consequences of War

Costs of Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Curtis P. Nettels
Curtis P. Nettels
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One influence of war has repeatedly asserted itself in the past—an effect on the costs of production and on the competitive position of the industries and firms of victorious or neutral nations. This subject needs more study, but certain facts suggest a hypothesis, of three parts. First: war expands some industries or concerns, increases their efficiency, enables them to operate, at the end of the struggle, on a comparatively low-cost basis, intensifies their competitive advantages, and improves their position in relation to foreign competitors. Second: war—for the duration—bolsters up some high-cost units by enabling them to sell at a profit all they can produce. The end of the war places such high-cost units at a disadvantage in the process of absorbing the shocks of the transition to a peacetime economy. Third: the history of postwar periods usually exhibits a sharp contest between such low-cost and high-cost enterprises. While “low cost” and “high cost” may refer to the relative positions of units within the same country, in most of this discussion, the terms will be applied to the producers of one country (either victor or neutral) to mean that their costs are low or high in comparison with those of their foreign competitors.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 3 , Supplement S1 , 1943 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 John, U. Nef, “The Industrial Revolution Reconsidered,” Hie Journal of Economic History, III (May, 1943), 24–25.Google Scholar

2 Hamilton, Earl J. “Profit Inflation and the Industrial Revolution,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, LVI (Feb., 1942), 258, 265.Google Scholar

3 Taussig, F. W.The Tariff History of the United States (New York, 1931), 11.Google Scholar

4 Schmidt, Louis B. “The Agricultural Revolution in the United States, 1860–1930,” Science, LXXII (Dec. 12, 1930), 585–594 (U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Reprint, p. 6.).Google Scholar

5 Bogart, E. L.An Economic History of the American People (New Vork: Longmans, Green and Company, 1937), 725Google Scholar

6 Mills, F. C.Economic Tendencies in the United States (New York: J J Little and Ibes, 1932), 530.Google Scholar

7 There is an interesting discussion of technology and the war in relation to $$ life in the supplement, “The Domestic Economy.” to the Dec., 1942 number of Fortune. See pp. 18–20.

8 Wallace, Henry A.America Must Choose (New York, 1934), 6.Google Scholar

9 Witte, Edwin E. “What the War Is Doing to Us,” Review of Politics, V (Jan., 1943), 5.Google Scholar

10 Ibid., 10.

11 Ibid., 14.

12 Jameson, J. F. The American Revolution Considered as a Social Movement (Princeton, 1940). 52–60Google Scholar; Beale, Howard K. “The Tariff and Reconstruction,” American Historical Review, XXXV (Jan., 1930), 277; Taussig, 17–18, 174, 449.Google Scholar

13 John H. Williams, “The Crisis of the Gold Standard,” Foreign Affairs, X (Jan., 1932), 179; Edwin F. Gay, “The Great Depression,” Foreign Affairs, X (July, 1932), 533–534; “Federal Reserve,” Fortune, XXVII (May, 1934), 118, 120.

14 “An American Proposal,” 63.

15 Quoted in “Estimate of the Future Economy,” Fortune, May, 1943 (editorial).

16 Hacker, Louis M.The Farmer Is Doomed (New York, 1933).Google Scholar