Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:46:17.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Market Organization, Protection, and Vertical Integration: German Cotton Textiles before 1914

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

John C. Brown
John C. Brown
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Economics at Clark University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the causes for the relatively high degree of vertical integration in the German cotton textile industry before 1914. Underdeveloped input and output markets exposed German textile firms to price risks not faced by English firms that had access to highly-developed cotton, yarn, and cloth markets. In addition, tariff protection may have prompted integration by its impact on market development. In the weaving sector in particular, the response to this structure of markets was a more diversified product line and integration of both spinning and weaving.

Type
Papers Presented at the Fifty-First Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 339 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldcroft, Derek, “British Industry and Foreign Competition,” in Aldcroft, Derek, ed., The Development of British Industry and Foreign Competition (Toronto, 1968), pp. 11–36.Google Scholar
Bericht der Handelskammer Stuttgart über das Jahr 1905/06 (Stuttgart, 1907).Google Scholar
Baumwollbörse, Bremer, Verzeichnis der Baumwollspinnereien (Bremen, 1909).Google Scholar
Chapman, S. J., and Ashton, T. S., “The Sizes of Businesses, Mainly in the Textile Industries,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 77 (04, 1914), pp. 469–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Gregory, “Why Isn't the Whole World Developed?,” this Journal, 47 (03, 1987), pp. 141–74.Google Scholar
Copeland, Melvin, The Cotton Manufacturing Industry of the United States (Cambridge, MA, 1912).Google Scholar
Dehn, R. M. R., The German Cotton Industry: A Report (Manchester, 1913).Google Scholar
The Economist (1880–1900).Google Scholar
Elton, Edwin J. and Gruber, Martin J., Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis, 2nd ed., (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
Farnie, Douglas, The English Cotton Industry and the World Market (Oxford, 1979).Google Scholar
Jacobs, Gustav, Die deutsche Textilzölle im neunzehnten Jahrhundert (Erlangen, 1907).Google Scholar
Jahresbericht der Handels- und Gewerbekammer für Öberfranken: 1907 (Hof, 1908).Google Scholar
Jahresbericht der Handels- und Gewerbekammer zu Chemnitz: 1906 (Chemnitz, 1907).Google Scholar
Jahresberichte der württembergischen Handels- und Gewerbekämmer (Stuttgart, 1887 and 1898).Google Scholar
Jahresbericht für die Stadt Münster: 1906 (Münster, 1907).Google Scholar
Kertesz, Anton, Die Textilindustrie sämtlicher Staaten (Braunschweig, 1917).Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles, “Germany's Overtaking of England,” in Economic Response. Comparative Studies in Trade, Finance and Growth (Cambridge, MA, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, Edgar, Handel und Produktion in der Baumwollindustrie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der lohnindustriellen Organisationsform (Tübingen, 1912).Google Scholar
Lazonick, William, “Industrial Organization and Technological Change: The Decline of the British Cotton Industry,” Business History Review 57 (Summer, 1983), pp. 195–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John S., “Vertical Integration in the British Cotton Industry, 1825–1850: A Revision,” this Journal, 45 (06, 1985), p. 419–25.Google Scholar
Madalla, G. S., Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (New York, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichsenquête für die Baumwollen- und Leinen-Industrie, Stenographische Protokolle (Berlin, 1878).Google Scholar
Rieger, Wilhelm, Verzeichnis der im Deutschen Reiche auf Baumwolle laufenden Spindeln und Webstühlen (Stuttgart, 1893 and 1909).Google Scholar
Schulze-Gävernitz, Gerhart, The Cotton Trade in England and the Continent (London, 1895).Google Scholar
Simonetti, Theodor, Entwicklung der Baumwollindustrie des Münsterlandes (Ph.D. Diss., Frankfurt, 1925).Google Scholar
Stigler, George J., “The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market,” Journal of Political Economy 49 (06, 1951), pp. 185–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A. J., “Concentration and Specialization in the Lancashire Cotton Industry, 1825–1850,” Economic History Review, 2nd series, 1 (1949), pp. 114–22.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter, “Product Quality and Integration in the Early Cotton Textile Industry,” this Journal (12, 1988), pp. 891–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Richard, Vom Zollverein zum Industriestaat (Munich, 1990), pp. 105–10.Google Scholar
Vietaljahrshefte zur Statistik des Deutschen Reiches, 1880–1900.Google Scholar
Webb, Stephen B., “Tariff Protection for the Iron Industry, Cotton Textiles and Agriculture in Germany, 1879–1914,” Jahrbüucher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 192 (1977), pp. 336–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar