Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T04:33:21.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political and Economic Geography of Southern Secession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2020

Mario L. Chacón  and
Jeffrey L. Jensen
Mario L. Chacón
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Division of Social Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, UAE. P.O. Box 129188. E-mail: mario.chacon@nyu.edu.
Jeffrey L. Jensen
Affiliation:
Lecturer, Division of Social Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, UAE. P.O. Box 129188. E-mail: jeffrey.jensen@nyu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the economic and political determinants of the Southern secession movement of 1860/61. While economic historians emphasize the importance of slavery to the South’s economy as the primary factor behind the movement, we demonstrate the important role that political inequality among whites played in facilitating secession. In particular, secession was decided in state conventions, which allowed secessionists to exploit biases to representation and may have been pivotal in Alabama and Georgia. Our results suggest that the region’s investment in slavery alone may not be sufficient to explain the electoral success of the movement in the largest Lower South states.

Type
Article
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 386 - 416
Copyright
© The Economic History Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Howard Rosenthal, Scott Gates, Abdul Noury, Ana Arjona, James Alt, David Stasavage, William Collins, and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. We also benefited from the suggestions of seminar participants at the MPSA and EPSA meetings, Universidad del Rosario, and Northwestern University. Last, we also thank Sidak Yntiso, Andrew Udelsman, Dario Romero, Binod Paduel, and Mathew Sumner for their assistance.

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James. “Persistence of Power, Elites, and Institutions.” American Economic Review 98, no. 1 (2008): 267–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Gerber, Alan, and Snyder, James. “Equal Votes, Equal Money: Court-Ordered Redistricting and Public Expenditures in the American States.” American Political Science Review 96, no. 4 (2002): 767–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atack, Jeremy. “Creating Historical Transportation Shapefiles of Navigable Rivers, Canals, and Railroads for the United States before World War I.” In The Routledge Companion to Spatial History, edited by Gregory, Ian, DeBats, Don, and Lafreniere, Don, 169–84. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, William. The Secessionist Impulse: Alabama and Mississippi in 1860. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Bearman, Peter. “Desertion as Localism: Army Unit Solidarity and Group Norms in the US Civil War.” Social Forces 70, no. 2 (1991): 321–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beringer, Richard, Jones, Archer, and Still, William. Why the South Lost the Civil War. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Buenger, Walter. “Secession Revisited: The Texas Experience.” Civil War History 30, no. 4 (1983): 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calomiris, Charles, and Pritchett, Jon. “Betting on Secession: Quantifying Political Events Surrounding Slavery and the Civil War.” American Economic Review 106, no. 1 (2016): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chacón, Mario L., and Jeffrey, L. Jensen. “Replication: The Political and Economic Geography of Southern Secession.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-17. https://doi.org/10.3886/E114887V1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary, and Katz, Jonathan. Elbridge Gerry’s Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofts, Daniel. Reluctant Confederates: Upper South Unionists in the Secession Crisis. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Denman, Clarence. The Secession Movement in Alabama. Montgomery, AL: Alabama State Department of Archives and History, 1933.Google Scholar
Dew, Charles B. “Who Won the Secession Election in Louisiana?” Journal of Southern History 36, no. 1 (1970): 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, William. “Conspiracy or Popular Movement: The Historiography of Southern Support for Secession.” North Carolina Historical Review 42, no. 1 (1965): 70–84.Google Scholar
Eggers, Andrew. “Proportionality and Turnout: Evidence from French Municipalities.” Comparative Political Studies 48, no. 2 (2015): 135–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. “Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process.” Duke Law Journal 45, no. 2 (1995): 364–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escott, Paul. After Secession: The Failure of Confederate Nationalism. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert. Without Consent or Contract: The Rise and Fall of American Slavery. New York, NY: WW Norton Company, 1994.Google Scholar
Freehling, William W.The Road to Disunion: Volume II: Secessionists Triumphant, 1854–1861. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Gary, Kelley. “Social Choice and Southern Secession in the United States.” Homo Oeconomicus 21 (2004): 355–72.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia. “The Economics of Emancipation.” Journal of Economic History 33, no. 1 (1973): 66–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, Felipe, Marshall, Guillermo, and Naidu, Suresh. “Start-up Nation? Slave Wealth and Entrepreneurship in Civil War Maryland.” Journal of Economic History 77, no. 2 (2017): 373–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, Gerald. “The Origin of the American Civil War.” Journal of Economic History 34, no. 4 (1974): 915–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Andrew B., Huff, Connor, and Kuriwaki, Shiro. “Wealth, Slaveownership, and Fighting for the Confederacy: An Empirical Study of the American Civil War.” American Political Science Review 113, no. 3 (2019): 658–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, William. North Carolina and the Coming of the Civil War. Raleigh, NC: Division of Archives and History, North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, 1988.Google Scholar
Jackman, Robert. “Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies.” American Political Science Review 81, no. 2 (1987): 405–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. P. “A New Look at the Popular Vote for Delegates to the Georgia Secession Convention.” Georgia Historical Quarterly 56, no. 2 (1972): 259–75.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P.Toward a Patriarchal Republic: The Secession of Georgia. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2001.Google Scholar
McCrary, Peyton, Miller, Clark, and Baum, Dale. “Class and Party in the Secession Crisis: Voting Behavior in the Deep South, 1856–1861.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8, no. 3 (1978): 429–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCurry, Stephanie. Confederate Reckoning: Power and Politics in the Civil War South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
McPherson, James M.Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Merritt, Keri. Masterless Men: Poor Whites and Slavery in the Antebellum South. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Albert W. “Inequality in the Distribution of Slave Wealth: The Cotton South and Other Southern Agricultural Regions.” Journal of Economic History 37, no. 3 (1977): 747–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noe, Kenneth W.Southwest Virginia’s Railroad: Modernization and the Sectional Crisis. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Nunn, Nathan. “Slavery, Inequality, and Economic Development in the Americas: An Examination of the Engerman-Sokoloff Hypothesis.” In Institutions and Economic Performance, edited by Helpman, Elhanan, 148–80. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Potter, David. Lincoln and His Party in the Secession Crisis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Potter, David. The Impending Crisis: America before the Civil War, 1848–1861. New York, NY: Harper Collins, 1976.Google Scholar
Rainwater, Percy. Mississippi: Storm Center of Secession, 1856–1861. Baton Rouge, LA: O. Claitor, 1938.Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger. Conflict and Compromise: The Political Economy of Slavery, Emancipation and the American Civil War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransom, Roger. “Economics of the Civil War.” EH.Net Encyclopedia, edited by Whaples, Robert. 2001. Available at http://eh.net/encyclopedia/the-economics-of-the-civil-war/.Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger. “The Civil War in American Economic History.” The Oxford Handbook of American Economic History (2018): 2, 371.Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger, and Sutch, Richard. “Capitalists without Capital: The Burden of Slavery and the Impact of Emancipation.” Agricultural History 62, no. 3 (1988): 133–60.Google Scholar
Sinha, Manisha. The Counterrevolution of Slavery: Politics and Ideology in Antebellum South Carolina. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2003.Google Scholar
James, Snyder, and Heckman, James. “Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators.” Rand Journal of Economics 28, no. S1 (1997): S142–89.Google Scholar
Stampp, Kenneth. And the War Came: The North and the Secession Crisis, 1860–1861. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Williams, David. Bitterly Divided: The South’s Inner Civil War. New York, NY: The New Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Williams, David, Williams, Teresa, and Carlson, David. Plain Folk in a Rich Man’s War: Class and Dissent in Confederate Georgia. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, 2002.Google Scholar
Wooster, Ralph. “The Louisiana Secession Convention.” Louisiana Historical Quarterly 34 (1951): 103–33.Google Scholar
Wooster, Ralph. “The Arkansas Secession Convention.” Arkansas Historical Quarterly 13, no. 2 (1954): 172–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooster, Ralph. “The Georgia Secession Convention.” Georgia Historical Quarterly 40, no. 1 (1956): 21–55.Google Scholar
Wooster, Ralph. The Secession Conventions of the South. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin. The Political Economy of the Cotton South: Households, Markets, and Wealth in the Nineteenth Century. New York, NY: WW Norton, 1978.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin. “Slavery and American Agricultural History.” Agricultural History (2003): 533–35.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin. Slavery and American Economic Development. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Chacón and Jensen Supplementary Materials

Chacón and Jensen Supplementary Materials

Download Chacón and Jensen Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 313.6 KB