Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T04:34:21.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real Wages and Labor Productivity in Britain and Germany, 1871–1938: A Unified Approach to the International Comparison of Living Standards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2010

Stephen Broadberry*
Affiliation:
Professor of Economic History, Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom. E-mail: S.N.Broadberry@warwick.ac.uk.
Carsten Burhop*
Affiliation:
Heisenberg Fellow, Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung von Gemeinschaftsgütern, Kurt-Schumacher-Straβe 10, 53113 Bonn, Germany; and Professor of Economic and Business History, Universität zu Köln, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Köln, Germany. E-mail: burhop@coll.mpg.de..

Abstract

Throughout the period 1871–1938, the average British worker was better off than the average German worker, but there were significant differences between major sectors. For the aggregate economy, the real wage gap was about the same as the labor productivity gap, but again there were important sectoral differences. Compared to their productivity, German industrial workers were poorly paid, whereas German agricultural and service sector employees were overpaid. This affected the competitiveness of the two countries in these sectors. There were also important differences in comparative real wages by skill level, affecting the extent of poverty.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abelshauser, Werner.“Lebensstandard im Industrialisierungsprozeβ: Britische Debatte und deutsche Verhältnisse.” Scripta Mercaturae 16, no. 1 (1982): 7192.Google Scholar
Allen, Robert C.“International Competition in Iron and Steel, 1850–1913.” The Journal of Economic History 39, no. 4 (1979): 911–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Robert C. “Pessimism Preserved: Real Wages in the British Industrial Revolution.” Oxford University Department of Economics Working Paper No. 314, 2007.Google Scholar
Arbeitswissenschaftliches Institut der Deutschen Arbeitsfront. Beiträge zur Statistik der Lebenshaltung des deutschen Arbeiters. Vorläufige Teilergebnisse einer Erhebung von Wirtschaftsrechnungen in Arbeiterhaushalten. Berlin: Verlag der Deutschen Arbeitsfront, 1940.Google Scholar
Balassa, Bela.“The Purchasing-Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal.” Journal of Political Economy 76, no. 3 (1964): 584–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balderston, Theo.“The Origins of Economic Instability in Germany, 1924–1930: Market Forces versus Economic Policy.” Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte 69, no. 3 (1982): 488514.Google Scholar
Barna, Tibor.Redistribution of Incomes Through Public Finance in 1937. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Bean, Jessica S., and Boyer., George “The Trade Boards Act of 1909 and the Alleviation of Household Poverty.” Paper presented at the Sixth World Congress of Cliometrics, Edinburgh, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentolila, Samuel, and Saint-Paul, Gilles. “Explaining Movements in the Labor Share.” Contributions to Macroeconomics 3, no. 1 (2003): Article 9.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier, and Fischer., StanleyLectures on Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Board of Trade. Report of an Enquiry by the Board of Trade into Working-Class Rents, Housing and Retail Prices together with the Standard Rates of Wages Prevailing in Certain Occupations in the Principal Industrial Towns of the United Kingdom (Cd. 3864). London: HMSO, 1908.Google Scholar
Board of Trade. Report of an Enquiry by the Board of Trade into Working-Class Rents, Housing and Retail Prices together with the Standard Rates of Wages Prevailing in Certain Occupations in the Principal Industrial Towns of the German Empire (Cd. 4032). London: HMSO, 1908.Google Scholar
Booth, Charles.Life and Labour of the People in London. London: Macmillan, 1903.Google Scholar
Borchardt, Knut.“Zwangslagen und Handlungspielräume in der groβe Wirtschaftskrise der frühen dreiβiger Jahre.” Jahrbuch der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (1979): 85132.Google Scholar
Bowley, Arthur L.Some Economic Consequences of the Great War. London: Thornton Butterworth, 1930.Google Scholar
Bowley, Arthur L., and Burnett-Hurst, Alexander R.. Livelihood and Poverty: A Study in the Economic Conditions of Working-class Households in Northampton, Warrington, Stanley and Reading. London: Bell, 1915.Google Scholar
Bowley, Arthur L., and Burnett-Hurst, Alexander R.. Economic Conditions of Working-class Households in Bolton, 1914: Supplementary Chapter to “Livelihood and Poverty.” London: Bell, 1920.Google Scholar
Bowley, Arthur L., and Hogg, Margaret H.. Has Poverty Diminished? A Sequel to Livelihood and Poverty. London: King, 1925.Google Scholar
Boyer, George R. “Living Standards, 1860–1939.” In The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Volume II: Economic Maturity, 1860–1939, edited by Floud, Roderick and Johnson, Paul, 280313. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, George R., and Hatton, Timothy J.. “New Estimates of British Unemployment, 1870–1913.” The Journal of Economic History 62, no. 3 (2002): 643–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N.The British Economy Between the Wars: A Macroeconomic Survey. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N.“The Emergence of Mass Unemployment: Explaining Macroeconomic Trends in Britain During the Trans-World War I Period.” Economic History Review 43, no. 2 (1990): 271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N.The Productivity Race: British Manufacturing in International Perspective, 1850-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N.“How Did the United States and Germany Overtake Britain? A Sectoral Analysis of Comparative Productivity Levels, 1870–1990.” The Journal of Economic History 58, no. 2 (1998): 375407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N.“Relative per Capita Income Levels in the United Kingdom and the United States Since 1870: Reconciling Time-Series Projections and Direct Benchmark Estimates.” The Journal of Economic History 63, no. 4 (2003): 852–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N.“Explaining Anglo-German Productivity Differences in Services Since 1870.” European Review of Economic History 8, no. 2 (2004): 229–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N.Market Services and the Productivity Race, 1850-2000: British Performance in International Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N., and Burhop., Carsten“Comparative Productivity in British and German Manufacturing Before World War II: Reconciling Direct Benchmark Estimates and Time-Series Projections.” The Journal of Economic History 67, no. 2 (2007): 315–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N., and Burhop., Carsten“Resolving the Anglo-German Industrial Productivity Puzzle: A Reply to Professor Ritschl.” The Journal of Economic History 68, no. 4 (2008): 930–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N., and Ritschl., Albrecht“Real Wages, Productivity, and Unemployment in Britain and Germany During the 1920s.” Explorations in Economic History 32, no. 3 (1995): 327–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchheim, Christoph.Deutsche Gewerbeexporte nach England in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts. Ostfildern: Scripta Mercaturae Verlag, 1982.Google Scholar
Burhop, Carsten, and Wolff, Guntram B.. “A Compromise Estimate of German Net National Product, 1851–1913 and Its Implications for Growth and the Business Cycle.” The Journal of Economic History 65, no. 3 (2005): 613–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Agatha L.Wages and Salaries in the United Kingdom, 1920-1938. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Clark, Gregory.“The Condition of the Working Class in England, 1209–2004.” Journal of Political Economy 113, no. 6 (2005): 1307–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, George D. H., and Postgate., RaymondThe Common People, 1746-1946. Fourth edition.London: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Davies, Maud F.Life in an English Village: An Economic and Historical Survey of the Parish of Corsley in Wiltshire. London: Unwin, 1909.Google Scholar
Desai, Ashok V.Real Wages in Germany, 1871-1913. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles H.National Income, Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom, 1855-1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles H.“New Estimates of Average Earnings in the United Kingdom, 1880–1913.” Economic History Review 43, no. 3 (1990): 595632.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles H. “Changes in Nominal Wages, the Cost of Living and Real Wages in the United Kingdom over Two Centuries, 1780–1990.” In Labour’s Reward: Real Wages and Economic Change in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Europe, edited by Scholliers, Peter and Zamagni, Vera, 3–36 and 258–66. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1995.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles H.“Pessimism Perpetuated: Real Wages and the Standard of Living in Britain During and After the Industrial Revolution.” The Journal of Economic History 58, no. 3 (1998): 625–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Percy.Work and Wealth in a Modern Port: An Economic Survey of Southampton. London: Allen & Unwin, 1934.Google Scholar
Fremdling, Rainer, Jong, Herman de, and Timmer., Marcel“Censuses Compared: A New Benchmark for British and German Manufacturing 1935/36.” The Journal of Economic History 67, no. 2 (2007): 350–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohmann, Larry.Poor Relief and Welfare in Germany from the Reformation to World War I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazeley, Ian, and Newell., Andrew “Poverty in Britain in 1904: An Early Social Survey Rediscovered.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 3046, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hachtmann, Robert.“Lebenshaltungskosten und Reallöhne während des ‘Dritten Reiches.’” Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, no. 75 (1988): 3273.Google Scholar
Harris, José.Unemployment and Politics: A Study in English Social Policy, 1886-1914. Oxford: Clarendon, 1972.Google Scholar
Hennock, E. Peter.The Origin of the Welfare State in England and Germany, 1850–1914: Social Policies Compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Walther G.Das Wachstum der deutschen Wirtschaft seit der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtfrerich, Carl-Ludwig.“Zu hohe Löhne in der Weimarer Republik? Bemerkungen zur Borchardt-These.” Geschichte und Gesellschaft no. 10 (1984): 122–41.Google Scholar
Huberman, Michael.“Working Hours of the World Unite? New International Evidence of Worktime, 1870–1913.” The Journal of Economic History 64, no. 4 (2004): 9641001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, Michael, and Minns., Christopher“The Times They Are Not ‘Changin’: Days and Hours of Work in Old and New Worlds, 1870–2000.” Explorations in Economic History 44, no. 4 (2007): 538–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Alfred, and Richter., HansDie Grosshandelspreise in Deutschland von 1792 bis 1934. Berlin: Hanseatische Verlagsanstalt, 1935.Google Scholar
Jones, David Caradog.The Social Survey of Merseyside. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Kaiserliches Statistisches Amt. Erhebung von Wirtschaftsrechnungen minderbemittelter Familien im Deutschen Reich. Berlin: Carl Heymann, 1909.Google Scholar
Khoudour-Castéras, David.“Welfare State and Labor Mobility: The Impact of Bismarck’s Social Legislation on German Emigration before World War I.” The Journal of Economic History 68, no. 1 (2008): 211243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labuske, Kirsten, and Streb., Jochen“Technological Creativity and Cheap Labour? Explaining the Growing International Competitiveness of German Mechanical Engineering Before World War I.” German Economic Review 9, no. 1 (2008): 6586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linsley, Colin A., and Linsley, Christine L.. “Booth, Rowntree, and Llewellyn Smith: A Reassessment of Interwar Poverty.” Economic History Review 46, no. 1 (1993): 88104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, John.British Trade Unions, 1875-1933. London: Macmillan, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, Angus.The World Economy: Historical Statistics. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallet, Bernard.British Budgets, 1887/88 to 1912/13. London: Macmillan, 1913.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Brian R.British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Müller, J. Heinz.Nivellierung und Differenzierung der Arbeitseinkommen in Deutschland seit 1925. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1954.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Patrick K., and Escosura, Leandro Prados de la. “Agricultural Productivity and European Industrialization, 1890–1980.” Economic History Review 45, no. 3 (1992): 514–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Rourke, Kevin.“The European Grain Invasion, 1870–1913.” The Journal of Economic History 57, no. 4 (1997): 775801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, Arthur D. K.A Survey of the Standard of Living in Sheffield. Sheffield: Sheffield Social Survey Committee, 1933.Google Scholar
Petzina, Dietmar. “Arbeitslosigkeit und Sozialstaat.” In Die Weimarer Republik als Wohlfahrtsstaat, edited by Abelshauser, Werner, 239–59. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1987.Google Scholar
Phelps Brown, E. Henry, and Browne, Margaret H.. A Century of Pay: The Course of Pay and Production in France, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, 1860-1960. London: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar
Pierenkemper, Toni.“The Standard of Living and Employment in Germany, 1850–1980: An Overview.” Journal of European Economic History 16, no. 1 (1987): 5173.Google Scholar
Prest, Alan R.Consumers’ Expenditure in the United Kingdom, 1900-1919. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Reuter, Hans-Georg. “Verteilungs- und Umverteilungseffekte der Sozialversicherung im Kaiserreich.” In Staatliche Umverteilung in historischer Perspektive, edited by Blaich, Fritz, 107–63. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1980.Google Scholar
Ritschl, Albrecht.“Zu hohe Löhne in der Weimarer Republik? Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Holtfrerichs Berechnungen zur Lohnposition der Arbeiterschaft, 1925–1932.” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 16, no. 4 (1990): 375402.Google Scholar
Ritschl, Albrecht.“The Anglo-German Industrial Productivity Paradox, 1895–1938: A Restatement and a Possible Resolution.” The Journal of Economic History 68, no. 3 (2008): 535–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritschl, Albrecht, and Spoerer., Mark“Das Bruttosozialprodukt in Deutschland nach den amtlichen Volkseinkommens-und Sozialproduktsstatistiken, 1901–1995.” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte no. 2 (1997): 2754.Google Scholar
Routh, Guy.Occupation and Pay in Great Britain, 1906-1960. London: Macmillan, 1960.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B. Seebohm.Poverty: A Study of Town Life. London: Macmillan, 1902.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B. Seebohm.Poverty and Progress: A Second Social Survey of York. London: Longmans, 1941.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A.“Theoretical Notes on Trade Problems.” Review of Economics and Statistics 46, no. 1 (1964): 145–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, Robert. “Lohn und Beschäftigung als Indikatoren für die soziale Lage der Arbeiterschaft in der Inflation.” In Die Anpassung an die Inflation, edited by Feldman, Gerald D. and Ambrosius, Gerold, 278322. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1986.Google Scholar
Smith, H. Llewellyn.The New Survey of London Life and Labour, 9 volumes. London: King, 1931–1935.Google Scholar
Statistisches Reichsamt. Statistisches Jahrbuch für das Deutsche Reich. Berlin: Statistisches Reichsamt, various years.Google Scholar
Stone, Richard, and Rowe, D. A.. The Measurement of Consumers’ Expenditure in the United Kingdom, 1920-1938, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Thane, Pat.Foundations of the Welfare State. Second edition. London: Longman, 1996.Google Scholar
Tout, Herbert.The Standard of Living in Bristol. Bristol: Arrowsmith, 1938.Google Scholar
Wiegand, Erich. “Zur historischen Entwicklung der Löhne und Lebenshaltungskosten in Deutschland.” In Wandel der Lebensbedingungen in Deutschland. Wohlfahrtsentwicklung seit der Industrialisierung, edited by Wiegand, E. and Zapf, W., 69153. Frankfurt/Main: Campus, 1982.Google Scholar
Williams, Ernest.Made in Germany. London: Heinemann, 1896.Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G.“The Evolution of Global Labor Markets Since 1830: Background Evidence and Hypotheses.” Explorations in Economic History 32, no. 1 (1995): 141–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar