Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:16:23.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relative U.K./U.S. Output Reconsidered: A Reply to Professor Broadberry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2004

MARIANNE WARD  and
JOHN DEVEREUX
MARIANNE WARD
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Loyola College in Maryland, 4501 North Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21210-2699. E-mail: mward3@loyola. edu
JOHN DEVEREUX
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Economics, Queens College and the Graduate Center, CUNY, Flushing, New York, New York, 11367-1597. E-mail: Jdevereu@qc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the September 2003 issue of this JOURNAL, we provided benchmark comparisons of U.K./U.S. income from 1870 to 1990. In contrast to long-span projections from Angus Maddison and others, our estimates show the United States leading from 1870 in terms of income per capita and output per worker. In a 12-page comment that accompanies our article, Professor Stephen Broadberry criticizes our work on three grounds. First, he charges our estimates are inconsistent with his U.K./U.S. sectoral productivity comparisons. Second, he chastises us on the grounds that our price benchmarks conflict with standard U.S. and U.K. price indices. Finally, he queries our nominal GDP estimates.

Type
NOTES AND DISCUSSION
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 879 - 891
Copyright
© 2004 The Economic History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aten Bettina, and Alan Heston. 2002 “Benchmark Reconciliations Revisited.” Unpublished Manuscript. University of Pennsylvania.
Balke Nathan S., and Robert J. Gordon. 1989 “The Estimation of Prewar Gross National Product: Methodology and New Evidence.” Journal of Political Economy 97, no. 1 84– 85.Google Scholar
Barger Harold, and Hans Lansberg. 1942 American Agriculture 1899–1939. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research,
Barger Harold. 1955 Distributions Place in the American Economy since 1869. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
Brady Dorothy. 1966 “Price Deflators for Final Product Estimates.” NBER Studies in Income and Wealth 30 91– 115.Google Scholar
Broadberry Stephen. 1997 “Forging Ahead, Falling Behind, and Catching-Up: A Sectoral Analysis of Anglo-American Productivity Differences, 1870–1990.” Research in Economic History 17 1– 37.Google Scholar
Broadberry Stephen. 1998 “How did the United States and Germany Overtake Britain? A Sectoral Analysis of Comparative Productivity Levels, 1870–1990.” This JOURNAL 58, no. 2 375– 407.Google Scholar
Broadberry Stephen. 2003 “Relative Per Capita Income Levels in the United Kingdom and the United States since 1870: Reconciling Time-Series Projections and Direct-Benchmark Estimates.” This JOURNAL 63, no. 3 852– 63.Google Scholar
Broadberry Stephen, and Douglas Irwin. “Labor Productivity in Britain and America during the Nineteenth Century.” Working paper, October 2003.
Clark Colin. 1940 The Conditions of Economic Progress. 1st edn. London: Macmillan,
Deane Phyllis. and W. A. Cole. 1967 British Economic Growth 1688–1959: Trends and Structure. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
Dalgaard Esben, and Henrik Sejerbo Serensen. “Consistency Between PPP Benchmarks and National Price and Volume Indices.” STD/NA (2002)3 http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/17/1957096.doc
Feinstein C. H. 1972 National Income, Expenditure and Output of The United Kingdom, 1855–1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
Fishlow Albert. 1966 “Productivity and Technological Change in the Railroad Sector, 1840–1910.” NBER Studies in Income and Wealth 30 583– 646.Google Scholar
Gallman Robert. 1960 “Commodity Output, 1839–1899.” NBER Studies in Income and Wealth 24 13– 71.Google Scholar
Gallman Robert. 1966 “Gross National Product in the United States, 1834–1909.” NBER Studies in Income and Wealth 30 3– 76.Google Scholar
Gallman Robert, and Thomas Weiss. 1969 “The Service Industries in the Nineteenth Century.” NBER Studies in Income and Wealth 34 287– 365.Google Scholar
Gilbert Milton, and Irving Kravis. 1954 An International Comparison of National Products and the Purchasing Power of Currencies. Paris: OEEC,
Heston Alan, and Robert Summers. 1993 “What can we Learn from Successive ICP Benchmark Estimates” in Explaining Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Angus Maddison. Edited by Adam Szirmai and Dirk Pilat. Amsterdam; New York: North Holland,
Jefferys James, and Dorothy Walters. 1955 “National Income and Expenditure in the United Kingdom: 1870–1950.” Income and Wealth, series 5, edited by Simon Kuznets, 1– 40. London: Bowes and Bowes,
Kendrick John W. 1961 Productivity Trends in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
Kuznets Simon. 1946 National Product Since 1869. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research,
Kuznets Simon. 1961 Capital in the American Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
Lebergott Stanley. 1964 Manpower in Economic Growth: The American Record Since 1800. New York: McGraw-Hill,
Lebergott Stanley. 1984 The Americans: An Economic Record. New York: W.W. Norton,
Maddison Angus. 1995 Monitoring the World Economy 1820–1992. Paris: Development Center of the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development,
Maddison Angus. 2001 The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective. Paris: Development Center of the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development,
Matthews R. C. O., C. H. Feinstein, and J. C. Odling-Smee. 1982 British Economic Growth 1856–1973. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press,
Mitchell B. R., and Phyllis Deane. 1962 Abstract of British Historical Statistics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press,
Ojala E. M. 1956 Agriculture and Economic Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
O'Brien Patrick, K., and Leandro Prados de la Escosura. 1992 “Agricultural Productivity and European Industrialization, 1890–1980.” Economic History Review. 45, no. 3 514– 36.Google Scholar
O'Rourke Kevin, and Jeffrey Williamson. 1999 Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press,
Paige D., and G. Bombach. 1959 A Comparison of National Output and Productivity of the United Kingdom and the United States. Paris: Organization of European Economic Cooperation,
Phelps Brown E. H., and M. H. Browne. 1963 “Carroll D. Wright and the Development of British Labor Statistics.” Economica 41, no. 3 277– 86.Google Scholar
Rhode Paul. “Gallman's Annual Output Series for the United States, 1834–1909.” NBER Working Paper No. 8860, April 2002.
Romer Christina. 1989 “The Pre-War Business Cycle Reconsidered: New Estimates of Gross National Product, 1869–1908.” Journal of Political Economy 97, no. 1 1– 37.Google Scholar
Rostas Lazlo. 1948 Productivity, Prices and Distribution in Selected British Industries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
Shaw William. 1947 Value of Commodity Output Since 1869. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research,
Summers Robert, and Alan Heston. 1991 “The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950–1988.” Quarterly Journal Of Economics 106, no. 2 327– 68.Google Scholar
Towne Marvin W., and Wayne D. Rasmussen. 1960 “Farm Gross Product and Gross Investment in the Nineteenth Century.” NBER Studies in Income and Wealth 24 255– 312.Google Scholar
1975 United States. Bureau of the Census. Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, DC: GPO,
Varjonen Seppo. 2001 “Consistency Between GDP Based on PPPs and National Accounts Time Series.” STD/NA 34 http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/3/13/2381036.docGoogle Scholar
Varjonen Seppo. “Improving the Quality of PPP Series” STD/NA (2002)17 http://www. oecd.org/dataoecd/51/21/1961624.pdf
Ward Marianne, and John Devereux. 2003 “Measuring British Decline: Direct Versus Long-Span Income Measures.” This JOURNAL 63, no. 3 826– 51.Google Scholar
Ward Marianne, and John Devereux. Data Appendix for “Measuring British Decline: Direct Versus Long-Span Income Measures.” Pdf document: http://www.evergreen.loyola.edu/~mward3/ or http://qcpages.qc.edu/~jdevereu/research.html
Ward Marianne, and John Devereux. “New Benchmark Estimates of U.K./U.S. Sectoral Productivity, 1870–1950.” Working paper, March 2004.