Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:16:02.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Soviet Steel Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

M. Gardner Clark
M. Gardner Clark
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this paper is to describe briefly the administrative organization and planning system of the typical large Soviet steel plant, and then show how the plant director carries out one of his essential functions both with the help of and in spite of the institutional framework within which he has to operate. Our attention will be focused primarily at the level of the individual firm, but in order to appreciate the problems of firm management we must first see how the individual enterprise fits into the all-pervading Soviet industrial bureaucracy.

Type
Development of Large-Scale Organization
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , Fall 1952 , pp. 396 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Arakelian, A., Industrial Management in the USSR, trans. Raymond, E. A. (Washington: Public Affairs Press, 1950), p. 122Google Scholar.

2 Those interested in a long, detailed, and informative discussion are referred to a recent book on the subject: Riabinʼkii, B. Ia., Planirovanic Proizvoditva na Metallurgicheskom Zavoda (Planning Production in Iron and Steel Works), (Moscow, 1950)Google Scholar. The description is based on it.

3 Business Cycles (New York, 1939), pp. 86–87Google Scholar.

4 Granick, David, “Plant Management in the Soviet Industrial System” (Ph.D. Thesis, Columbia University, 1951), p. 9Google Scholar. On the organization of technical and scientific research in Soviet metallurgy see Clark, M. G., “Economics of Soviet Steel” (to be published by Harvard University Press in the spring of 1953), chap. iiiGoogle Scholar.

5 Pravda, August 10, 1951.

6 Stal', 1947, No. 3, p. 196, No. 8, pp. 690–701, 1948, No. 1, p. 20, No. 8, pp. 683–91, and No. 10, p. 867; Pravda, October 4, 1949; Trud, January 31, 1952.

7 Clark, “Economics of Soviet Steel,” chap. v.

8 G. I. Nosov, “Magnitogorsk Metallurgical Combine Named after Stalin,” Stal', 1947, No. 11, pp. 1045–50; also p. 969, and Trud, September 30, 1945.

9 Clark, op. cit., chap. xiii.

10 On Soviet adoption of high pressure see: Bardin, and Bannyi, , Chernaia Metallurgiia v Novoi Piatiletke (Moscow, 1947), p. 81Google Scholar; N. I. Krasavtsev, “Operation of Blast Furnaces Under High Pressure,”in section on foreign metallurgical news, Stal'1948, No. 6, pp. 561–63; Stal', 1947, No. 2, p. 191, No. 3, p. 180, No. 5, p. 477, 1948, No. 9, pp. 775–87. No. 10, pp. 946–49, No. 12, p. 1142; Izvestia, September 8, 1949; Pravda, January 31, February 11, March 34, May 11, December 27, 1951, January 5, 31, 1952; Trud, March 4, August 10, September 27, October 29, 1950, January 31, February 16, 21, March 2, April 1, 5, 6, 8, 21, 1951.

11 Pravda, November 4, 1949.

12 Schchelokov, M., “A Soviet Plant Director,” USSR Information Bulletin, September 7, 1951. P. 519Google Scholar. Ilʼin, G. M., “The Hammer and Sickle Works,” Stal', 1947, No. 11, pp. 1051–54Google Scholar. See also Granick, “Plant Management,” p. 62.

13 On the adoption of oxygen in open hearths, see also Bardin and Bannyi, Chemaia Metallurgiia, p. 157; Plan. Khoz., 1951, No. 6, p. 23; Stal', 1947, No. 9, pp. 807–14, 1948, No. 6, p. 574; Pravda, January 5, 1952; Trud, April 9, 1949.

14 On the number of Stalin prizes, see USSR Information Bulletin, February n, 1952, p. 68, and Pravda, December 26, 1949.