Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:23:04.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unemployment, employment contracts, and compensating wage differentials: michigan in the 1890s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Timothy J. Hatton  and
Jeffrey G. Williamson
Timothy J. Hatton
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in Economics, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, England CO4 3SQ.
Jeffrey G. Williamson
Affiliation:
Laird Bell Professor of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Surveys taken by the Michigan Bureau of Labor and Industrial Statistics in the 1890s reveal that unemployment was pervasive among unskilled workers. The incidence of unemployment was not associated with personal characteristics, but rather with the type of employment contract and job: those with high risk of layoff commanded a wage premium. Seasonality is an important part of this late nineteenth-century story, and the subsequent demise of seasonal activities may have had an important impact on the evolution of labor market institutions.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 605 - 632
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abowd, John, and Ashenfelter, Orley, “Anticipated Unemployment, Temporary Layoffs, and Compensating Wage Differentials,” in Rosen, Sherman, ed., Studies in Labor Markets (Chicago, 1981).Google Scholar
Adams, James D., “Permanent Differences in Unemployment and Permanent Wage Differentials,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100 (02 1985), pp. 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, George R., An Economic History of the English Poor Law, 1750–1850 (Cambridge, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Susan B., and Savoca, Elizabeth, “Did the Proletarian Float? Evidence from San Francisco, 1892” (Paper presented to the Economic History Workshop, Harvard University, 02 1988).Google Scholar
Carter, Susan B., and Sutch, Richard, “The Labor Market in the 1890s: Evidence from Connecticut Manufacturing,” in Eichengreen, Barry, ed., Unemployment and Underemployment in Historical Perspective (1990 International Economic History Congress, Leuven, 1990).Google Scholar
Haines, Michael, “The Life Cycle, Savings, and Demographic Adaptation: Some Historical Evidence for the United States and Europe,” in Rossi, Alice S., ed., Gender and the Life Course (New York, 1985).Google Scholar
Hall, Robert E., “Turnover in the Labor Force,” Brookings Papers in Economic Activity, 3 (1972), pp. 709–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanes, Christopher, “Explaining a Decrease in Cyclical Wage Flexibility in the Late Nineteenth Century” (Paper presented at the 30th Annual Cliometrics Conference, University of Illinois, 05 18–20, 1990).Google Scholar
Hatton, Timothy J., and Williamson, Jeffrey G., “Wage Gaps Between Farm and City: Michigan in the 1890s” (Discussion Paper No. 1449, Harvard Institute of Economic Research, 09 1989).Google Scholar
Hatton, Timothy J., and Williamson, Jeffrey G., “Unemployment in the 1890s: Micro economic Evidence from Michigan,” in Eichengreen, Barry, ed., Unemployment and Underemployment in Historical Perspective (1990 International Economic History Congress, Leuven, 1990).Google Scholar
Hatton, Timothy J., and Williamson, Jeffrey G., “What Explains Wage Gaps Between Fasm and City? Exploring the Todaro Model with American Evidence 1890–1941,” Economic Development and Cultural Change (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Jacoby, Sanford M., Employing Bureaucracy: Managers, Unions, and the Transformation of Work in American Industry, 1900–1945 (New York, 1985).Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander, Out of Work: The First Century of Unemployment in Massachusetts (New York, 1986).Google Scholar
Licht, Walter, Working for the Railroad: The Organization of Work in the Nineteenth Century (Princeton, 1983).Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S., Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (Cambridge, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margo, Robert A., “Unemployment in 1910: Some Preliminary Findings,” in Eichengreen, Barry, ed., Unemployment and Underemployment in Historical Perspective (1990 International Economic History Congress, Leuven, 1990).Google Scholar
Michigan Bureau of Labor and Industrial Statistics, 10th Annual Report (Lansing, 1893).Google Scholar
Michigan Bureau of Labor and Industrial Statistics, 11th Annual Report (Lansing, 1894).Google Scholar
Michigan Bureau of Labor and Industrial Statistics, 12th Annual Report (Lansing, 1895).Google Scholar
Modell, John, “Changing Risks, Changing Adaptations: American Families in the Nineteenth Century,” in Lichtman, Allan J. and Challinor, Joan R., eds., Kin and Communities: Families in America (Washington, DC, 1979).Google Scholar
Montgomery, David, The Fall of the House of Labor: The Workplace, the State, and American Labor Activism, 1865–1925 (New York, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardinelli, Clark, “Were Children Exploited During the Industrial Revolution?” Research in Economic History, 11 (1988), pp. 243–76.Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger L., and Sutch, Richard, “Two Strategies for a More Secure Old Age: Life-Cycle Saving by Late-Nineteenth-Century American Workers” (Paper presented at the Washington Area Economic History Seminar, University of Maryland-Baltimore, 03 31, 1989).Google Scholar
Reza, Ali M., “Geographic Differences in Earnings and Unemployment Rates,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 60 (05 1978), pp. 201–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Sherman, “Unemployment and Insurance,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 20 (Autumn 1983), pp. 5–49.Google Scholar
Rosen, Sherman, “Implicit Contracts: A Survey,” Journal of Economic Literature, 23 (09 1985), pp. 1144–75.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam, The Wealth of Nations, edited by Cannan, E. (Chicago, 1976).Google Scholar
Smith, James P., and Welch, Finis, “Local Labor Markets and Cyclical Components in Demand for College Trained Manpower,” Annales de I'INSEE, 30 /31 (04/09 1978), pp. 599–629.Google Scholar
Sundstrom, William A., “Internal Labor Markets Before World War I: On-the-Job Training and Employee Promotion,” Explorations in Economic History, 25 (10 1988), pp. 424–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topel, Robert H., “Equilibrium Earnings, Turnover, and Unemployment: New Evidence,” Journal of Labor Economics, 2 (10 1984), pp. 500–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topel, Robert H., “Local Labor Markets,” Journal of Political Economy, 94, part 2 (06 1986), pp. S111–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Labor, 18th Annual Report (Washington, DC, 1904).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970 (Washington, DC, 1975).Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G., “Was the Industrial Revolution Worth It? Disamenities and Death in 19th Century British Towns,” Explorations in Economic History, 19 (07 1982), pp. 221–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar