Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:22:04.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Persistent Bias Among Local Election Officials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2019

D. Alex Hughes Open the ORCID record for D. Alex Hughes [Opens in a new window] ,
Micah Gell-Redman Open the ORCID record for Micah Gell-Redman [Opens in a new window] ,
Charles Crabtree ,
Natarajan Krishnaswami ,
Diana Rodenberger  and
Guillermo Monge
D. Alex Hughes
Affiliation:
School of Information, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
Micah Gell-Redman
Affiliation:
Department of International Affairs and Department of Health Policy & Management, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
Charles Crabtree
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Natarajan Krishnaswami
Affiliation:
School of Information, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
Diana Rodenberger
Affiliation:
School of Information, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
Guillermo Monge
Affiliation:
School of Information, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Results of an audit study conducted during the 2016 election cycle demonstrate that bias toward Latinos observed during the 2012 election has persisted. In addition to replicating previous results, we show that Arab/Muslim Americans face an even greater barrier to communicating with local election officials, but we find no evidence of bias toward blacks. An innovation of our design allows us to measure whether e-mails were opened by recipients, which we argue provides a direct test of implicit discrimination. We find evidence of implicit bias toward Arab/Muslim senders only.

Keywords

ballot accessturnoutfield experimentcorrespondence study
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Winter 2020 , pp. 179 - 187
Copyright
© The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The data, code, and compute environment required to replicate all analyses in this article are available at the Journal of Experimental Political Science Dataverse within the Harvard Dataverse Network, at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/8E1IIM (Hughes et al., 2019). The authors are aware of no conflicts of interest regarding this research.

References

REFERENCES

Abrajano, Marisa A. and Alvarez, Michael M.. 2010. New Faces, New Voices: The Hispanic Electorate in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne, Chugh, Dolly and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2005. Implicit Discrimination. American Economic Review 95(2): 94–98.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M. and Duflo, E.. 2017. Field Experiments on Discrimination. In Handbook of Field Experiments, eds. Vinayak Banerjee, Abhijit and Duflo, Esther. Vol. 1. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland 309–393. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214658X1630006X Google Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2004. Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination. American Economic Review 94(4): 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M. 2014. Representing the Advantaged: How Politicians Reinforce Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Daniel M and Broockman, David E.. 2011. Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 463–477.Google Scholar
Butler, Daniel M and Homola, Jonathan. 2017. An Empirical Justification for the Use of Racially Distinctive Names to Signal Race in Experiments. Political Analysis 25(1): 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, Patricia G. 1989. Stereotypes and Prejudice: Their Automatic and Controlled Components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56(1): 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, Katherine Levine and Glick, David M.. 2017. Does Race Affect Access to Government Services? An Experiment Exploring Street-Level Bureaucrats and Access to Public Housing. American Journal of Political Science 61: 100–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaddis, S Michael and Ghoshal, Raj. 2015. Arab American Housing Discrimination, Ethnic Competition, and the Contact Hypothesis. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 660(1): 282–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Bedolla, Lisa and Michelson, Melissa R.. 2012. Mobilizing Inclusion: Transforming the Electorate Through Get-out-the-Vote Campaigns. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gell-Redman, Micah, Visalvanich, Neil, Crabtree, Charles and Fariss, Christopher. 2018. It’s All About Race: How State Legislators Respond to Immigrant Constituents. Political Research Quarterly 71(3):517–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S and Green, Donald P.. 2012. Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. New York, NY: WW Norton.Google Scholar
Grimmer, Justin, Hersh, Eitan, Meredith, Marc, Mummolo, Jonathan and Nall, Clayton. 2018. Obstacles to Estimating Voter ID laws’ Effect on Turnout. Journal of Politics 80(3):1045–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan and Abrajano, Marisa. 2015. White Backlash: Immigration, Race, and American Politics. New Haven, CT: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan, Lajevardi, Nazita and Nielson, Lindsay. 2017. Voter Identification Laws and the Suppression of Minority Votes. The Journal of Politics 79(2):363–379.Google Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan and Lee, T.. 2011. Why Americans Don’t Join the Party: Race, Immigration, and the Failure (of Political Parties) to Engage the Electorate. New Haven, CT: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, D. Alex, Gell-Redman, Micah and Crabtree, Charles. 2016. Who Gets to Vote? Evidence in Government and Politics, EGAP ID: 20161001AA. http://egap.org/registration/2183 Google Scholar
Hughes, D. Alex, Gell-Redman, Micah, Crabtree, Charles, Krishnaswami, Natarajan, Monge, Guillermo and Rodenberger, Diana. 2019. Replication Data for: Persistent Bias Among Local Election Officials. Harvard Dataverse doi: 10.7910/DVN/8E1IIM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamal, Amaney and Naber, Nadine. 2007. Race and Arab Americans Before and After 9/11: From Invisible Citizens to Visible Subjects. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York, NY: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
McNulty, John E., Dowling, Conor M. and Ariotti, Margaret H.. 2009. Driving Saints to Sin: How Increasing the Difficulty of Voting Dissuades Even the Most Motivated Voters. Political Analysis 17(4): 435–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pager, Devah. 2003. The Mark of a Criminal Record. American Journal of Sociology 108(5): 937–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagopoulos, Costas. 2006. The Polls-Trends: Arab and Muslim Americans and Islam in the Aftermath of 9/11. Public Opinion Quarterly 70(4): 608–624.Google Scholar
White, Ariel R., Nathan, Noah L. and Faller, Julie K.. 2015. What Do I Need to Vote? Bureaucratic Discretion and Discrimination by Local Election Officials. American Political Science Review 109(1): 129–142.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Hughes et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/8E1IIM
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Hughes et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Hughes et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.3 MB