Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:25:32.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Threat and Information Acquisition: Evidence from an Eight Country Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2018

Jennifer L. Merolla  and
Elizabeth J. Zechmeister
Jennifer L. Merolla
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA, e-mail: merolla@ucr.edu, Twitter:@merollajenn
Elizabeth J. Zechmeister
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA, e-mail: liz.zechmeister@vanderbilt.edu, Twitter:@ejzech
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We assess individuals’ responses to news about threat, compared to news about positive indicators of well-being, using data from nine experiments conducted across eight countries. The general proposition is that exposure to news about threat increases tendencies to “tune in” to information, compared to those presented with news about better times. The evidence strongly supports this expectation: without exception, the average respondent recalls and seeks more information about terrorist threat than good times. Further, this pattern of results generalizes to other threats. The study thematically and geographically extends research on negative information and political learning. It also has broader implications: absorbing newsworthy information is foundational to the types of attitudes citizens express and the extent to which, and how, they engage in the world around them.

Keywords

Informationnegativity biasthreatterrorism
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , Winter 2018 , pp. 167 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Materials required to replicate all analyses in this article are available at the Journal of Experimental Political Science Dataverse within the Harvard Dataverse Network, at doi:10.7910/DVN/YJOPLH. Support for this project was granted from the National Science Foundation (Award nos. 0850824 and 0851136).

References

REFERENCES

Albertson, Bethany and Gadarian, Shana K.. 2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F., Bratslavsky, Ellen, and Finkenauer, Catrin. 2001. “Bad is Stronger than Good.” Review of General Psychology 5 (4): 323–70.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted. 2005. “Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 388–405.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, Samuel D., Angelini, James R., and Lee, Sungkyoung. 2007. “Psychophysiological and Memory Effects of Negative Political Ads: Aversive, Arousing, and Well Remembered.” Journal of Advertising 36 (4): 115–27.Google Scholar
Carver, Charles S. 2004. “Negative Affects Deriving from the Behavioral Approach System.” Emotion 4 (1):3–22.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. 1980. “Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38: 889–906.Google Scholar
Freedman, Paul, Franz, Michael, and Goldstein, Kenneth. 2004. “Campaign Advertising and Democratic Citizenship.” American Journal of Political Science 48: 723–41.Google Scholar
Fridkin, Kim Leslie and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2008. “The Dimensions of Negative Messages.” American Politics Research 36: 694–723.Google Scholar
Gadarian, Shana Kushner. 2010. “The Politics of Threat: How Terrorism News Shapes Foreign Policy Attitudes.” Journal of Politics 72: 469–83.Google Scholar
Gadarian, Shana Kushner and Albertson, Bethany. 2014. “Anxiety, Immigration, and the Search for Information.” Political Psychology 35 (2): 133–64.Google Scholar
Geer, John G. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, Eddie, Harmon-Jones, Cindy, Abramson, Lyn, and Peterson, Carly K.. 2009. “PANAS Positive Activation is Associated with Anger.” Emotion 9 (2): 183–96.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1964. Adaptation-Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Aaron M., Kowal, Chris, and Kaire de Francisco, José. 2013. “Terrorism Coverage and the Fear of Terrorism.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Feldman, Stanley, and Cassese, Erin. 2007. “On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger.” In The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, eds. Russell Neuman, W., Marcus, George E., Crigler, Ann, and MacKuen, Michael. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ito, Tiffany A., Larsen, Jeff T., Kyle Smith, N., and Cacioppo, John T.. 1998. “Negative Information Weighs More Heavily on the Brain: The Negativity Bias in Evaluative Categorizations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (4): 887–900.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39: 341–50.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1982. “Negativity in Political Perception.” Political Behavior 4 (4): 353–77.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1985. “Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 29: 119–38.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., Sigelman, Lee, and Rovner, Ivy B.. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment.” Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1176–209.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S. and Keltner, Dacher. 2000. “Beyond Valence: Toward a Model of Emotion-Specific Influences on Judgment and Choice.” Cognition and Emotion 14 (4): 473–93.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer, Keele, Luke, and Marcus, George E.. 2010. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 440–58.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Colin and Mathews, Andrew. 1988. “Anxiety and the Allocation of Attention to Threat.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (4): 653–70.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E. and MacKuen, Michael B.. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement During Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 87: 672–85.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E. and MacKuen, Michael B.. 2001. “Emotions and Politics: The Dynamic Functions of Emotionality.” In Citizens and Politics: Perspectives from Political Psychology, ed. Kuklinski, James. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer, and Keele, Luke. 2006. “The Measure and Mismeasure of Emotion.” In Feeling Politics: Emotion in Political Information Processing, ed. Redlawsk, David. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Russell Neuman, W., and MacKuen, Michael B.. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merolla, Jennifer L. and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2009. Democracy at Risk: How Terrorist Threats Affect the Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merolla, Jennifer L. and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2018. “Replication Data for: Threat and Information Acquisition from an Eight Country Study.” doi: 10.7910/DVN/YJOPLH.Google Scholar
Merolla, Jennifer L., Montalvo, Daniel, Zechmeister, Elizabeth J., and Zizumbo-Colunga, Daniel. 2011. “Terrorism and Democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, March 31–April 3.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Niemi, Richard G., and Amato, Timothy. 1995. “Emotions, Issue Importance, and Political Learning.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 558–74.Google Scholar
Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T.. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sherif, M. and Sherif, C. W.. 1967. “Attitudes as the Individual's Own Categories: The Social Judgment Approach to Attitude Change. In Attitude, Ego Involvement, and Change, eds. Sherif, C. W. and Sherif, M.. New York: Wiley, pp. 105–39.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul. 1969. “Differential Effects of Real versus Hypothetical Payoffs on Choices among Gambles.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3): 434–37.Google Scholar
Tiedens, Larissa Z. and Linton, Susan. 2001. “Judgment under Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty: The Effects of Specific Emotions on Information Processing.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 973–88.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., Banks, Antoine J., and Davis, Anne K.. 2008. “Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning via the Internet.” Political Psychology 29 (2): 247–73.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Merolla and Zechmeister supplementary material

Merolla and Zechmeister supplementary material 1

Download Merolla and Zechmeister supplementary material(File)
File 93.3 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Merolla and Zechmeister Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YJOPLH
Link