Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T20:31:59.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Benchmark Discrepancies and Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2021

K. J. Martijn Cremers
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame Mendoza College of Businessmcremers@nd.edu
Jon A. Fulkerson
Affiliation:
University of Dayton School of Business Administrationjfulkerson1@udayton.edu
Timothy B. Riley*
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas Walton College of Business
*
tbriley@uark.edu (corresponding author)

Abstract

We introduce a new holdings-based procedure to identify whether a mutual fund has a benchmark discrepancy, which we define as a benchmark other than the prospectus benchmark best matching a fund’s investment strategy. We find that funds with a benchmark discrepancy tend to be riskier than their prospectus benchmarks indicate. As a result, the funds on average outperform their prospectus benchmarks, before further risk adjustments, despite underperforming the benchmarks that best match their portfolios.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank an anonymous referee, Chris Clifford, Jennifer Conrad (the editor), Brigitte Dooley, Brad Jordan, Yuekun Liu, Berk Sensoy, Sara Shirley, Jeff Stark, Russ Wermers, Qing Yan, seminar participants at the University of Dayton, members of the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) Society Arkansas, and participants at the 2018 Financial Management Association Annual Meeting (especially discussant Andrei Simonov), 2019 Southwest Finance Symposium (especially discussant Yifan Liu), 2019 Eastern Finance Association Annual Meeting (especially discussant Fan Chen), and 2019 Financial Management Association European Conference (especially discussant Javier Estrada) for their helpful comments and suggestions. All errors are our own. Disclosure: Cremers is currently an independent director at Ariel Investments and a consultant to Touchstone Investments and State Street Associates, and Fulkerson and Riley have both been previously compensated by Natixis Investment Managers and the Investment Adviser Association.

References

Agarwal, V.; Green, C.; and Ren, H.. “Alpha or Beta in the Eye of the Beholder: What Drives Hedge Fund Flows?Journal of Financial Economics, 127 (2018), 417434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Goyenko, R.. “Mutual Fund’s R 2 as Predictor of Performance.” Review of Financial Studies, 26 (2013), 667694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asness, C.; Frazzini, A.; and Pedersen, L.. “Quality Minus Junk.” Review of Accounting Studies, 24 (2019), 34112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B.; Huang, X.; and Odean, T.. “Which Factors Matter to Investors? Evidence from Mutual Fund Flows.” Review of Financial Studies, 29 (2016), 26002642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-David, I.; Li, J.; Rossi, A.; and Song, Y.. “What Do Mutual Fund Investors Really Care About?” Working Paper, Ohio State University (2019).Google Scholar
Berk, J., and van Binsbergen, J.. “Assessing Asset Pricing Models Using Revealed Preference.” Journal of Financial Economics, 119 (2016), 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blocher, J., and Molyboga, M.. “The Revealed Preference of Sophisticated Investors.” European Financial Management, 23 (2017), 839872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, N., and Busse, J.. “On the Timing Ability of Mutual Fund Managers.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 10751094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K.; Harlow, W. V.; and Starks, L.. “Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 85110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S., and Goetzmann, W.. “Mutual Fund Styles.” Journal of Financial Economics, 43 (1997), 373399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, C.; Iliev, P.; and Velthuis, R.. “Style Drift: Evidence from Small-Cap Mutual Funds.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 78 (2017), 4257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carhart, M.On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 5782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, J., and Ellison, G.. “Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives.” Journal of Political Economy, 105 (1997), 11671200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, J.Presidential Address: Discount Rates.” Journal of Finance, 66 (2011), 10471108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremers, M., and Curtis, Q.. “Do Mutual Fund Investors Get What They Pay For? The Legal Consequences of Closet Index Funds.” Virginia Law and Business Review, 11 (2016), 3193.Google Scholar
Cremers, M., and Petajisto, A.. “How Active Is Your Fund Manager? A New Measure That Predicts Performance.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 33293365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremers, M.; Petajisto, A.; and Zitzewitz, E.. “Should Benchmark Indices Have Alpha? Revisiting Performance Evaluation.” Critical Finance Review, 2 (2012), 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, K.; Grinblatt, M.; Titman, S.; and Wermers, R.. “Measuring Mutual Fund Performance with Characteristic-Based Benchmarks.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 10351058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Guercio, D., and Tkac, P.. “Star Power: The Effect of Morningstar Ratings on Mutual Fund Flow.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43 (2008), 907936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiBartolomeo, D., and Witkowski, E.. “Mutual Fund Misclassification: Evidence Based on Style Analysis.” Financial Analysts Journal, 53 (1997), 3243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, E.; Gruber, M.; and Blake, C.. “The Performance of Separate Accounts and Collective Investment Trusts.” Review of Finance, 18 (2014), 17171742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R.Mutual Fund Incubation.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 15811611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R., and Sun, Y.. “Models or Stars: The Role of Asset Pricing Models and Heuristics in Investor Risk Adjustment.” Working Paper, University of Virginia (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.. “A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model.” Journal of Financial Economics, 116 (2015), 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, G.; Giglio, S.; and Xiu, D.. “Taming the Factor Zoo: A Test of New Factors.” Journal of Finance, 75 (2020), 13271370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazzini, A., and Pedersen, L.. “Betting against Beta.” Journal of Financial Economics, 111 (2014), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J.; Sialm, C.; and Zhang, H.. “Risk Shifting and Mutual Fund Performance.” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2011), 25752616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacperczyk, M.; Sialm, C.; and Zheng, L.. “On the Industry Concentration of Actively Managed Equity Mutual Funds.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 19832011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, L.; Tang, Y.; and Gomez, J.. “Portfolio Manager Compensation in the U.S. Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Finance, 74 (2019), 587638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, L., and Stambaugh, R.. “Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Political Economy, 111 (2003), 642685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, L.; Stambaugh, R.; and Taylor, L.. “Fund Tradeoffs.” Journal of Financial Economics, 138 (2020), 614634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensoy, B.Performance Evaluation and Self-Designated Benchmark Indexes in the Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Financial Economics, 92 (2009), 2539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, W.Asset Allocation: Management Style and Performance Measurement.” Journal of Portfolio Management, 18 (1992), 719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirri, E., and Tufano, P.. “Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 15891622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stambaugh, R., and Yuan, Y.. “Mispricing Factors.” Review of Financial Studies, 30 (2017), 12701315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wermers, R. “Matter of Style: The Causes and Consequences of Style Drift in Institutional Portfolios.” Working Paper, University of Maryland (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Cremers et al. supplementary material

Cremers et al. supplementary material 1

Download Cremers et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 870.5 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Cremers et al. supplementary material

Cremers et al. supplementary material 1

Download Cremers et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.9 MB