Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T16:29:12.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beta Stationarity and Estimation Period: Some Analytical Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Michael Theobald
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The stationarity of beta factors has received considerable attention in the financial economics literature. One particular area of study has been to investigate how the measured stationarity of beta factors changes over data sets of varying lengths. By increasing the length of the estimation period, sampling fluctuations may be reduced; however, the probability of beta factors having changed will increase. The optimal data set length, then, involves a trade-off between these two opposing phenomena. Baesel [2] reported the empirical finding that the stationarity of beta was, indeed, dependent upon the estimation period length over which beta factors were estimated. He found, using transition matrices that beta stationarity was an increasing function of the calendar period used for beta estimation. In this paper, analytic expressions will be derived to explain how and when this empirical phenomenon arises. Conditions will be presented for beta stationarity to increase with calendar period length, and it will be demonstrated that beta stationarity will not increase indefinitely with estimation period length. An identical condition is required for beta stationarity to be an increasing function of the subsequent calendar period length. This phenomenon was empirically investigated by Roenfeldt, Griepentrog, and Pflaum [6], and the analysis presented here explains, in part, their findings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 16 , Issue 5 , December 1981 , pp. 747 - 757
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Altman, E.; Jacquillat, B.; and Levasseur, M.. “Comparative Analysis of Risk Measures: France and the United States.” Journal of Finance (12 1979).Google Scholar
[2]Baesel, J. “On the Assessment of Risk: Some Further Considerations.” Journal of Finance (12 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Blume, M. “On the Assessment of Risk.” Journal of Finance (03 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Fisher, L. “Estimation of Systematic Risk: Some New Findings.” Proceedings of the Seminar on the Analysis of Security Prices (05 1970).Google Scholar
[5]Kon, S., and Lau, W.. “Specification Tests for Portfolio Regressions Parameter Stationarity and the Implications for Empirical Research.” Journal of Finance (05 1979).Google Scholar
[6]Roenfeldt, R.; Griepentrog, G.; and Pflaum, C.. “Further Evidence on the Stationarity of Beta Coefficients.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (03 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Theobald, M. “An Analysis of the Market Model and Beta Factors Using U.K. Equity Share Data.” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (Spring 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Theobald, M.. “Implications of Structural Changes in Beta Factors.” Working paper, Manchester University (1980).Google Scholar