Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T15:01:32.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment: Portfolio Performance of Property-Liability Insurance Companies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Paul Swadener
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Considering Professors Monroe's and Trieschmann's own analysis and methodology, it seems that their conclusion and implications of the results are considerably reduced in scope from those presented in their paper. I would like to discuss this new approach within the broader scope of their work. I will conclude with several points which closely relate to their work but which are not, by their choice, a part of the present paper.

Type
Discussant
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , March 1972 , pp. 1619 - 1623
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Moody's Bank and Financial Manual.

2 While Swadener can use premium volume as a criterion, Monroe and Trieschmann cannot?

1. Swadener merely asks discussion of the selection.

2. Swadener's purpose and variables are quite different from those of Monroe and Trieschmann; Swadener's study had the particular objective of indicating that margin on sales is not an appropriate measure of overall performance of an insurance company.