Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:21:37.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comment — The Capital Growth Model: An Empirical Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

Since this comment should be primarily addressed to Professors Bicksler's and Thorp's own research and results, I will not consider those pages that contain the authors' interpretation of prior studies.

Professors Bicksler and Thorp study the short-run properties of the optimal growth model via Monte Carlo simulation. This is an interesting idea because of the mathematical difficulty of the problem.

Type
Discussants
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This information, which is not in the paper, was given to me by Professor Thorp.

2 At the meetings I mentioned that a quick calculation had shown that conclusion 5 was wrong (and hence that 2 was correct) for the case of the uniform distribution. Most of the participants did not believe the result. I checked the calculation and I must confess that I was wrong and that the intuition of the participants was correct. God bless intuition!

In the appendix I include the derivation of the equation for λ*. It is interesting to notice that λ* is fairly sensitive to changes in r, e.g., for r = 0, λ* = 3.59, bu for r = 0.05, λ* = 2.81.