Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:55:07.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corporate Leverage and the Dynamics of Its Components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2019

Armen Hovakimian*
Affiliation:
A. Hovakimian, armen.hovakimian@baruch.cuny.edu, Baruch College Zicklin School of Business
Gayané Hovakimian
Affiliation:
G. Hovakimian, hovakimian@fordham.edu, Fordham University Gabelli School of Business
*
A. Hovakimian (corresponding author), armen.hovakimian@baruch.cuny.edu

Abstract

We investigate the dynamics of observed and target leverage ratios and deviations from the targets. The cross-sectional persistence in leverage ratios is driven by persistent targets, whereas time-series variation is driven by transitory deviations from targets. Consistent with dynamic trade-off theories, persistence is higher when the costs of deviating from targets are lower and when the adjustment costs are higher. Deviations are less persistent for firms that are over-levered and firms that are smaller, younger, or more focused or that have lower credit ratings. In recessions, excess leverage is less persistent for larger firms and is more persistent for smaller firms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Harry DeAngelo, Mark Flannery (the referee), Paul Malatesta (the editor), and participants at the 2018 Financial Management Association Asia Conference and the seminar at Baruch College for helpful comments. A. Hovakimian thanks the Bert and Sandra Wasserman endowment for financial support.

References

Baker, M., and Wurgler, J.. “Market Timing and Capital Structure.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 132.Google Scholar
Bernanke, B., and Blinder, A.. “Credit, Money, and Aggregate Demand.” American Economic Review, 78 (1988), 435439.Google Scholar
Bernanke, B.; Gertler, M.; and Gilchrist, S.. “The Financial Accelerator and the Flight-to-Quality.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 78 (1996), 115.Google Scholar
Boot, A. W. A.; Milbourn, T. T.; and Schmeits, A.. “Credit Ratings as Coordination Mechanisms.” Review of Financial Studies, 19 (2006), 81118.Google Scholar
Chang, X., and Dasgupta, S.. “Target Behavior and Financing: How Conclusive Is the Evidence?Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 17671796.Google Scholar
Chen, H.Macroeconomic Conditions and the Puzzles of Credit Spreads and Capital Structure.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 21712212.Google Scholar
Covas, F., and Den Haan, W. J.. “The Cyclical Behavior of Debt and Equity Finance.” American Economic Review, 101 (2011), 877899.Google Scholar
DeAngelo, H., and Roll, R.. “How Stable Are Corporate Capital Structures?Journal of Finance, 70 (2015), 373418.Google Scholar
Faulkender, M.; Flannery, M. J.; Hankins, K. W.; and Smith, J. M.. “Cash Flows and Leverage Adjustments.” Journal of Financial Economics, 103 (2012), 632646.Google Scholar
Faulkender, M., and Petersen, M. A.. “Does the Source of Capital Affect Capital Structure?Review of Financial Studies, 19 (2006), 4579.Google Scholar
Fischer, E. O.; Heinkel, R.; and Zechner, J.. “Dynamic Capital Structure Choice: Theory and Tests.” Journal of Finance, 44 (1989), 1940.Google Scholar
Flannery, M., and Rangan, K.. “Partial Adjustment toward Target Capital Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 79 (2006), 469506.Google Scholar
Hadlock, C., and Pierce, J.. “New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving beyond the KZ Index.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 19091940.Google Scholar
Hovakimian, A., and Li, G.. “Is the Partial Adjustment Model a Useful Tool for Capital Structure Research?Review of Finance, 16 (2012), 733754.Google Scholar
Hovakimian, A.; Opler, T.; and Titman, S.. “The Debt-Equity Choice.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36 (2001), 124.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C.Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers.” American Economic Review, 76 (1986), 323329.Google Scholar
Kuppuswamy, V., and Villalonga, B.. “Does Diversification Create Value in the Presence of External Financing Constraints? Evidence from the 2007–2009 Financial Crisis.” Management Science, 62 (2016), 905923.Google Scholar
Leary, M. T., and Roberts, M. R.. “Do Firms Rebalance Their Capital Structures?Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 25752619.Google Scholar
Lemmon, M.; Roberts, M.; and Zender, J.. “Back to the Beginning: Persistence and the Cross-Section of Corporate Capital Structure.” Journal of Finance, 63 (2008), 15751608.Google Scholar
Miller, M.Debt and Taxes.” Journal of Finance, 32 (1977), 261275.Google Scholar
Myers, S.Determinants of Corporate Borrowing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (1977), 147175.Google Scholar
Rajan, R., and Zingales, L.. “What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 14211460.Google Scholar
Ross, S. A.The Determination of Financial Structure: The Incentive-Signaling Approach.” Bell Journal of Economics, 8 (1977), 2340.Google Scholar
Shyam-Sunder, L., and Myers, S. C.. “Testing Static Tradeoff against Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 51 (1999), 219244.Google Scholar
Titman, S.The Effect of Capital Structure on a Firm’s Liquidation Decision.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (1984), 137151.Google Scholar
Titman, S., and Wessels, R.. “The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice.” Journal of Finance, 43 (1988), 119.Google Scholar
Welch, I.Capital Structure and Stock Returns.” Journal of Political Economy, 112 (2004), 106131.Google Scholar