Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T20:42:08.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deleting Unreported Innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2021

Ping-Sheng Koh ,
David M. Reeb Open the ORCID record for David M. Reeb [Opens in a new window] ,
Elvira Sojli ,
Wing Wah Tham  and
Wendun Wang
Ping-Sheng Koh
Affiliation:
ESSEC Business School kohp@essec.edu
David M. Reeb*
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore and Asian Bureau of Finance and Economic Research
Elvira Sojli
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales e.sojli@unsw.edu.au
Wing Wah Tham
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales w.tham@unsw.edu.au
Wendun Wang
Affiliation:
Erasmus School of Economics wang@ese.eur.nl
*
dmreeb@nus.edu.sg (corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The absence of observable innovation data for a firm often leads us to exclude or classify these firms as non-innovators. We assess the reliability of six methods for dealing with unreported innovation using several different counterfactuals for firms without reported R&D or patents. These tests reveal that excluding firms without observable innovation or imputing them as zero innovators and including a dummy variable can lead to biased parameter estimates for observed innovation and other explanatory variables. Excluding firms without patents is especially problematic, leading to false-positive results in empirical tests. Our tests suggest using multiple imputation to handle unreported innovation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 57 , Issue 6 , September 2022 , pp. 2324 - 2354
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The simulation code and R&D imputed data are available at www.wendunwang.weebly.com/research.html. An early version of this article circulated under the title “Missing Innovation around the World.” We appreciate discussions and advice from an anonymous referee, Renee Adams, Sumit Agarwal, Benito Arrunda, Richard Boylan, Lora Dimitrova, Bronwyn Hall, Jarrad Harford (the editor) Gilles Hilary, Yael Hochberg, Qin Li, Gustavo Manso, Jiaming Mao, Naci Mocan, Randall Morck, Ivan Png, Wenlan Qian, Amit Seru, Vijay Singal, Noah Stoffman, Xuan Tian, and Rosemarie Ziedonis. We are grateful to seminar participants at City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Louisiana State University, Maastricht University, the National University of Singapore, Rotterdam School of Management, Temple University, the University of Queensland, the University of South Carolina, the University of Toronto, Virginia Tech, Wilfrid Laurier University, University of Technology Sydney, and the 2020 Price College of Business (PCOB) Valuation & Accounting for Intangible Assets Workshop. Koh acknowledges financial support from the ESSEC Foundation and CY Initiative of Excellence.

References

Anton, J., and Yao, D.. “Little Patents and Big Secrets: Managing Intellectual Property.” RAND Journal of Economics, 35 (2004), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, D.; Dorn, D.; Hanson, G.; Pisano, G.; and Shu, P.. “Foreign Competition and Domestic Innovation: Evidence from US Patents.” American Economic Review: Insights, 2 (2020), 357–374.Google Scholar
Bellstam, G.; Cookson, A.; and Bhagat, S.. “A Text-Based Analysis of Corporate Innovation.” Management Science, 67 (2021), 4004–4031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bena, J., and Li, K.. “Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 1923–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branstetter, L.; Drev, M.; and Kwon, N.. “Get With the Program: Software-Driven Innovation in Traditional Manufacturing.” Management Science, 65 (2019), 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, G. “Panel Data.” In Handbook of Econometrics, Griliches, Z. and Intrilligator, M. D., eds. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland (1984).Google Scholar
Collins, L. M.; Schafer, J. L.; and Kam, C.. “A Comparison of Inclusive and Restrictive Strategies in Modern Missing Data Procedures.” Psychological Methods, 6 (2001), 330–351.Google ScholarPubMed
Corrado, C.; Martin, D.; and Wu, Q.. “Innovation α: What Do IP-Intensive Stock Price Indexes Tell Us about Innovation?” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 110 (2020), 31–35.Google Scholar
De Simone, L.; Huang, J.; and Krull, L.. “R&D and the Rising Foreign Profitability of U.S. Multinational Corporations.” Accounting Review, 95 (2020), 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.. “Testing the Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt.” Review of Financial Studies, 15 (2002), 1–33.Google Scholar
Financial Accounting Standard Board. ASC 205-10-45. Accounting Standards Codification. Available at http://asc.fasb.org/ (n.d.).Google Scholar
Grangier, D., and Melvin, I.. “Feature Set Embedding for Incomplete Data.” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Conference Proceedings, Shawe-Taylor, J., Zemel, R. S., Bartlett, P. L., Pereira, F., and Weinberger, K. Q., eds. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates (2010).Google Scholar
Hombert, J., and Matray, A.. “Can Innovation Help U.S. Manufacturing Firms Escape Import Competition from China?” Journal of Finance, 73 (2018), 2003–2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, N., and Lipsitz, S.. “Multiple Imputation in Practice: Comparison of Software Packages for Regression Models with Missing Values.” American Statistician, 55 (2001), 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, F.; Warton, D.; and Foster, S.. “Tuning Parameter Selection for the Adaptive Lasso Using ERIC.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110 (2015), 262–269.Google Scholar
Koch, A.; Panayides, M.; and Thomas, S.. “Common Ownership and Competition in Product Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 131 (2021), 109–137.Google Scholar
Koh, P.-S., and Reeb, D.. “Missing R&D.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60 (2015), 73–94.Google Scholar
Koh, P.-S.; Reeb, D.; and Zhao, W.. “CEO Confidence and Unreported R&D.” Management Science, 64 (2018), 5461–5959.Google Scholar
Lerner, J., and Seru, A.. “The Use and Misuse of Patent Data: Issues for Corporate Finance and Beyond.” Working Paper, Harvard University (2017).Google Scholar
Little, R. “A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83 (1988), 1198–1202.Google Scholar
Masulis, R., and Zhang, E.. “How Valuable Are Independent Directors? Evidence from External Distractions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 132 (2019), 226–256.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A.; Singh, M.; and Zaldokas, A.. “Do Corporate Taxes Hinder Innovation?” Journal of Financial Economics, 124 (2017), 195–221.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. “Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 435–480.Google Scholar
Png, I. “Law and Innovation: Evidence from State Trade Secrets Laws.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 99 (2017), 167–179.Google Scholar
Reeb, D. M., and Zhao, W.. “Disregarding the Shoulders of the Giants: Evidence from Innovation Research.” Working Paper, National University of Singapore (2020).Google Scholar
Robins, J., and Wang, N.. “Inference for Imputation Estimators.” Biometrika, 87 (2000), 113–124.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. “Inference and Missing Data.” Biometrika, 63 (1976), 581–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, J., and Graham, J.. “Missing Data: Our View of the State of the Art.” Psychological Methods, 7 (2002), 147–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, S. B. “Simple Formulas for Standard Errors That Cluster by Both Firm and Time.” Journal of Financial Economics, 99 (2011), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Koh et al. supplementary material

Koh et al. supplementary material

Download Koh et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 392.4 KB