Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T14:47:44.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution Moments and Equilibrium: A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

Using the mean-variance model, Sharpe [5] and Lintner [4] have derived an equilibrium model for price determination under uncertainty. Jean [2] has tried to generalize this model so that other moments of the distribution will be taken into account. The purpose of this note is to show that unlike the Sharpe-Lintner model, Jean's results make no economic sense.

Type
Communications
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Arditti, F. D. “Risk and the Required Rate of Return.” Journal of Finance, March 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Jean, W. H. “The Extension of Portfolio Analysis to Three or More Parameters.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, January 1971.Google Scholar
[3]Levy, H. “A Utility Function Depending on the First Three Moments.” Journal of Finance, September 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Lintner, J. “Security Price, Risk and Maximal Gains from Diversification.” Journal of Finance, December 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Sharpe, W. F. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk.” Journal of Finance, September 1964.Google Scholar
[6]Sprenkle, C. M. “Warrant Prices as Indicators of Expectations and Preferences.” in The Random Character of Stock Market Prices, ed., Cootner, Paul, M.I.T. Press, 1964.Google Scholar
[7]Tobin, J. “Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk.” Review of Economic Studies, February 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar